Kang Wang1, Paul Manning1, Tanya Wolfson 2, Michael S. Middleton1, Jeffrey Schwimmer3, Kimberley Newton3, Cynthia Behling3, Janis Durelle3, Melissa Paiz3, Jorge Angeles3, Meng Yin4, Kevin Glaser4, Richard Ehman4, and Claude Sirlin1
1Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, United States, 2Computational and Applied Statistics Laboratory, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States, 3Department of Pediatric, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States, 4Departments of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
Synopsis
We evaluated
the feasibility of utilizing heterogeneity of hepatic stiffness in 3D MR
elastography to improve detection of liver fibrosis in a cohort of 70 children
with NAFLD. Children were dichotomized into two classes of fibrosis. We characterized
the heterogeneity of hepatic stiffness by fitting a bi-Gaussian model to the
histogram of hepatic stiffness. Features from the bi-Gaussian model and the
known class labels were used to develop a support vector machine (SVM) classification
model to predict fibrosis. We demonstrated that the SVM model
has better overall classification performance than the calculated mean hepatic stiffness as
measured by AUROC.Purpose
MR elastography
(MRE) is used to estimate hepatic tissue stiffness in vivo. A continuous harmonic
vibration is applied to the upper abdomen, and shear waves are generated that
propagate through the liver. The resulting wave images are analyzed with an
inversion algorithm to generate an elastogram that depicts hepatic stiffness spatial
distribution
1. Mean values within regions
of interest (ROIs) placed on the elastogram representing mean liver stiffness
may be calculated. These mean hepatic stiffness values have been shown to accurately
detect advanced fibrosis in a variety of liver conditions, but they are only moderately
accurate in detecting earlier-stage fibrosis
2, 3. Through our lab's use of an
advanced 3D version of MRE (3D MRE) in pediatric research studies, we have
noticed qualitatively that the distribution of hepatic stiffness is homogeneous
in some children, but heterogeneous in others with patchy areas of elevated
stiffness against a background of lower stiffness. Although the cause of this
apparent stiffness heterogeneity is unknown, it plausibly may represent true heterogeneity
in underlying liver fibrosis that might not be well characterized by mean
hepatic stiffness. We hypothesized that local heterogeneity in the distribution
of hepatic stiffness may be helpful in detecting fibrosis. Thus, the purpose of
this study was to assess the feasibility of using heterogeneity information in
the distribution of hepatic stiffness to improve the performance of 3D MRE in
the detection of liver fibrosis, especially earlier-stage fibrosis.
Methods
This
retrospective analysis of data acquired prospectively between 2011 and 2014 included
70 children (53 boys, 17 girls, mean age 13 yrs, range 10-18 yrs, mean body
mass index 30 kg/m
2, range 21-51 kg/m
2) with known or
suspected NAFLD. Parents gave informed consent. Children gave informed assent
and underwent 3D MRE at 60Hz within 180 days of clinical-care liver biopsy. MRE
scans were performed on a 3T GE scanner using a motion-sensitized spin-echo
echo-planar imaging sequence
4. Biopsies were scored for
fibrosis on a 5-point nominal scale (0-4) according to NASH CRN criteria
5. Subjects were dichotomized into
two classes: 'no fibrosis' (stage 0) vs. 'any fibrosis' (stage 1-4). Two elastogram-derived
metrics were used to discriminate 'no fibrosis' from 'any fibrosis': mean
hepatic stiffness, and a support vector machine (SVM)-generated score designed
to account for local hepatic heterogeneity. Mean hepatic stiffness values were calculated
from ROIs placed on elastograms. For the SVM-generated score, a bi-Gaussian
model was fitted to the histogram of hepatic stiffness values, and the
following features of the histogram of hepatic stiffness values were recorded
for each of the two Gaussian models: mean stiffness values, standard deviation
of stiffness values, and number of voxels. An SVM model with a radial basis
kernel function was developed based on the features derived from the
bi-Gaussian model and the known class label. The parameters for the SVM model
were determined based on a least average classification error from 10-fold
cross-validation procedures. For each child’s elastogram, the final SVM model
computed a score ranging from 0 to 1, with 1 being highly likely that the child
has fibrosis. Performance of classification was determined for each of the two elastogram-derived
metrics (i.e. mean hepatic stiffness, and SVM-generated score) using the receiver
operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. The measure of overall
performance was the area under the ROC curve (AUROC).
Results
The distribution of
fibrosis stages 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 for the 70 enrolled children were 44 (63%),
17 (24%), 4 (6%), 4 (6%) and 1 (1%), respectively. Informally comparing AUROC for
the two metrics, the SVM-generated score had better overall classification
performance than mean hepatic stiffness (0.87 vs. 0.78).
Comparing the ROC curve for
the two elastogram-derived metrics, the SVM-generated score had higher
sensitivity for detecting liver fibrosis for any given specificity greater than
0.75.
Discussion
We hypothesize
that the SVM-generated score has higher sensitivity because incorporated within
that score is information from the bi-Gaussian model which characterizes heterogeneity
in the distribution of hepatic stiffness. For children with fibrosis, more than
85% were stage 1 or 2, suggesting that the SVM model helped improve the
detection of earlier-stage fibrosis in this pediatric cohort.
Conclusion
We
demonstrated the feasibility of utilizing the heterogeneity in the distribution
of hepatic stiffness in 3D MRE to improve detection of liver fibrosis,
especially earlier-stage fibrosis.
Acknowledgements
The research is supported by the following research grants: R01 DK106419, R56 DK090350References
1. A. Manduca, T. E. Oliphant, M. A. Dresner,
J. L. Mahowald, S. A. Kruse, E. Amromin, J. P. Felmlee, J. F. Greenleaf, and R.
L. Ehman, “Magnetic resonance elastography: non-invasive mapping of tissue
elasticity.,” Med Image Anal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 237–254, Dec. 2001.
2. M. Yin, J. A. Talwalkar, K. J. Glaser, A.
Manduca, R. C. Grimm, P. J. Rossman, J. L. Fidler, and R. L. Ehman, “Assessment
of Hepatic Fibrosis With Magnetic Resonance Elastography,” Clinical
Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 1207–1213.e2, Oct.
2007.
3. R. Loomba, T. Wolfson, B. Ang, J. Booker,
and C. Behling, “Magnetic resonance elastography predicts advanced fibrosis in
patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A prospective study." Hepatology 2014.
4. M. Yin, R. C. Grimm, and A. Manduca,
“Rapid EPI-based MR elastography of the liver,” presented at the Proceedings of
the ISMRM, 2006.
5. D. E. Kleiner, E. M. Brunt, M. Van Natta,
C. Behling, M. J. Contos, O. W. Cummings, L. D. Ferrell, Y.-C. Liu, M. S.
Torbenson, A. Unalp-Arida, M. Yeh, A. J. McCullough, A. J. Sanyal, Nonalcoholic
Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network, “Design and validation of a
histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.,” Hepatology,
vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1313–1321, Jun. 2005.