Kai Wang1, Yunwen Shao1, Tongxin Chen1, Chuangjian Cai1, Yan Zhu2, and Kui Ying3,4
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, People's Republic of, 2Psychiatry Department, Yu Quan Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, People's Republic of, 3Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, People's Republic of, 4Key Laboratory of Particle and Radiation Imaging, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China, People's Republic of
Synopsis
Entropy indicates system
irregularity. Sample Entropy (SampEn), an estimation of entropy in a relatively
robust way, was used to differentiate patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
from healthy controls and to explore the mechanism of MDD. In this work, we
found five clusters with significantly different SampEn in MDD group from that
of control group, located in left frontal lobe, left parietal lobe,
left temporal lobe, cerebellum and occipital lobe respectively, and the overall
accuracy obtained with linear support vector machine formed by SampEn of those
regions was 86.7%(p=0.000). TARGET AUDIENCE
Psychologists,
behaviorists, fMRI investigators, neuroimaging scientists, and clinicians.
PURPOSE
Entropy indicates system
irregularity. The system with high entropy has a high level of uncertainty and randomness. In this work, we proposed a method by use
of the sample entropy (SampEn), an estimation of entropy in a relatively robust
way [1], to differentiate medication-free patients with Major Depressive
Disorder from healthy controls and explore the mechanism of MDD.
METHOD
Subjects 14
patients diagnosed with MDD and 16 demographically similar healthy participants
(male, right-handed, Chinese speaker, aged from 20 to 25, no
history of drugs) were recruited with approval from local ethics committee and
signed consent forms from the subjects. Resting state fMRI (rs-fMRI) images
were acquired using a 3T scanner (SIEMENS MAGNETOM Trio) with following
parameters: GRE-EPI sequence, TR/TE=2000/30ms, 30 slices, slice thickness=4mm,
FOV=210mmX210mm, and matrix=64X64, lasting for seven minutes per subject.
Image
preprocessing The preprocessing included DICOM
to NIFTI conversion, slice timing correction, realignment, normalization and
spatial smoothing (Gaussian kernel=4mm). Nuisance covariates including six
motion parameters, global mean signal, white matter and cerebrospinal fluid
signal were regressed out. Resultant data was further detrended and filtered
(0.01Hz~0.08Hz) using DPARSF (Yan & Zang, 2010, http://www.restfmri.net).
Parameter
Evaluation for Entropy Calculation The
algorithm to calculate SampEn was described by [2]. According to previous
SampEn studies of biomedical signals (Z Wang el at., 2014; M Costa el at.,
2002; P R Norris el at., 2009), m=2, 3
and r from 0.2 to 0.7std (standard variation of the time course) with the
interval 0.05std were evaluated. After traversing all pairs of m and r to
calculate a set of SampEn values for time course of every AAL region and every
subject, two sample T-test was performed between MDD group and control groups
to identify regions with a significantly different SampEn. Then SPSS (http://www-01.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/products/statistics/)
was used to calculate areas under ROC curves for those regions identified by
T-tests. The maximum area of ROC appeared at m=2 and r=0.55std, which obtained
the most precise classification of the two groups, so the corresponding m and r
were used in further analysis.
Statistical
analysis using atlas of 950 regions In order to
obtain a higher spatial accuracy, parameters of m=2 and r=0.55std were used to
calculate SampEn of 950 regions [2]. Then two-sample T-test was performed for each
of the 950 regions, with significance level
=0.01 (alpha-sim multicomparison correction).
Evaluation
by linear support vector machine (SVM) Linear SVM was
used to evaluate the T-test results. SampEn of regions identified by the
T-tests was used to form a classifier, and leave-one-out algorithm was adopted
to examine the accuracy rate for both MDD group (sensitivity) and control group
(specificity), and the generalization rate (the overall accuracy), noted as GR0. Also, the generalization rate GR was used as a
statistics in a permutation test to calculate the significance level, which
repeated permutation for 100,000 times where labels of training data were
randomly permuted prior to training and generalization rate was calculated by
cross-validation with the original labels.
RESULTS
In this study, we found that MDD patients had higher
SampEn values in left frontal lobe, left parietal lobe, left temporal lobe, and
cerebellum than those in controls, while the SampEn in occipital lobe in MDD was
lower than that in control subjects (shown in fig. 2). With leave-one-out
algorithm, the SVM classifier achieved an accuracy of 86.7% (78.6% for
patients, and 93.8% for controls, p=0.000).
DISCUSSION
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study
using SampEn of rs-fMRI signals to differentiate MDD patients from healthy
controls. In the current study, patients with MDD showed higher SampEn in the
left prefrontal cortex, which is consistent with what was discovered by
previous studies (K.L. Phan, T. Wager, S.F. Taylor, & I. Liberzon, 2002). Cerebellum
has been underemphasized in neuropsychiatric research, but a growing confluence
of scientific data indicates that cerebellum and its neural connections may be
relevant to neuropsychiatric disorders (J.Z. Konarski, 2005). Abnormalities
of occipital lobe (L Wang et al., 2008) of MDD group were discovered, and decreased
temporal lobe activation may be a specific marker of limbic dysfunction (M.M.
Machulda, 2003), implying that these regions can both be involved in emotional processing
(IM Veer et al., 2010). Results of this study were in good accordance with
previous studies. Sample entropy is a quantitative measure, making a
potentially useful index for studying MDD.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Capital Medical Development and Scientific Research Grant.
References
[1] Richman, J.S., etc. American
Journal of Physiology. Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 2000. 278 (6). (47-6).
[2] Wang Z, etc. PloS one, 2014, 9(3): e89948.
[2]
R. Cameron Craddock, etc. Human Brain Mapping. A whole brain fMRI atlas
generated via spatially constraint spectral clustering. 2012. 33(8):
doi:10.1002/hbm.21333.