Joel Daouk1, Ludovic Viart2, Fabien Saint2, and Olivier Baledent1,3
1Bioflow Image, University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France, 2Urology, CHU Amiens, Amiens, France, 3Medical image processing, CHU Amiens, Amiens, France
Synopsis
In this work, we compared two fMRI paradigms to assess the volunteer
pelvic floor muscles contraction.
Paradigms suited the block-design method and the action phases consisted in
contraction of the pelvic floor muscles (continuously in "Continuous"
paradigm and repeated in "pulsed" paradigm) and rest phases were
complete relaxation.
Results showed that there was no significant
difference in cluster size between "continuous" and
"pulsed" paradigms. However, Z-max was significantly
higher in the “pulsed” paradigm than in the “continuous” one (p <0.001). fMRI, with a pulsed paradigm, is a suitable technique to assess volunteer pelvic floor muscles contraction.
Purpose
In various neurological conditions, urinary continence
is impaired. Only a few studies evaluated by imaging brain areas involved in
the volunteer control of micturition
1. In this work, we compared two
fMRI paradigms to assess the volunteer pelvic floor muscles contraction.
Methods
MR acquisitions were performed on a 3T Philips Achieva dStream scanner
(Philips medical systems). 11 healthy participants were enrolled (ages 22-31
years) and underwent anatomical 3D T1 acquisition (TR/TR = 9/4ms, flip
angle 8°, FOV = 256x256mm² in 384x384 matrices, slice thickness=0.9mm) followed
by T2 weighted EPI sequences (TR/TR = 3000/35ms, flip angle 90°, FOV =
260x260mm² in 160x160 matrices, slice thickness=4mm). Cerebral activation sequences were performed with two different
paradigms: "continuous" and "pulsed". Instructions were
given in the form of simple vocal order. Paradigms suited the block-design method and the action phases consisted in
contraction of the pelvic floor muscles (continuously in "Continuous"
paradigm and repeated in "pulsed" paradigm) and rest phases were
complete relaxation. Each paradigm was constituted with four rest blocks
alternating with four action blocks (each of which lasting 30s – 10 volumes
acquired). For the “pulsed” paradigm, 10 contractions were performed per block.
Activation maps were
first generated with FSL FEAT2 software. Activation maps were
generated with a Z-score threshold> 3.5 and registered onto MNI template to
locate the five largest areas as well as the 5 most intense areas (Highest
Z-max) for each participant. A t test was performed to compare the distribution
of the cluster size and the Z-max obtained with each paradigm.
Results
The two paradigms have
isolated the same areas of interest, i.e. the primary motor cortex (Brodmann
area 4) and secondary (Brodmann area 6). Other regions involved in control
voiding were also detected less frequently (Insula, GCA, Pons). For each subject,
paradigms have isolated at least five areas with a Z score > 3.5. There was
no significant difference in cluster size between "continuous" and
"pulsed" paradigms (p = 0.28). However, Z-max was significantly
higher in the “pulsed” paradigm than in the “continuous” one (p <0.001).
Conclusion
Our study is the first
to compare two different paradigms to assess volunteer pelvic floor muscles
contraction. Our main result showed a significantly increased the Z score (p
<0.001) in the “pulsed” paradigm meaning that repetitive contractions of
striated urethral sphincter yield a more intense cerebral activation than a
single sustained contraction. This innovative study intended to extend the
functional MRI technique to clinical applications, particularly in the
pathophysiology of bladder and sphincter disorders and idiopathic neurological
origins.
Acknowledgements
Grant support by
Conseil Regional de Picardie; Institut Faire Faces (imaging).ANR, Conseil régional de PicardieReferences
1
J.P. Kuhtz-Buschbeck, R. Gilster, C. Van Der Horst, M. Hamann, S. Wolff, O.
Jansen, Control of bladder sensations : An fMRI study of brain activity and
effective connectivity. NeuroImage,
47:18-27, 2009
2 M.
Jenkinson, C.F. Beckmann, T.E. Behrens, M.W. Woolrich, S.M. Smith. FSL. NeuroImage, 62:782-90, 2012