Concurrent 32-channel electrophysiological recording and fMRI in bilateral rat striatum
Saul Jaime1,2, Hanbing Lu1, Jose Cavazos2,3, and Yihong Yang1

1Neuroimaging Research Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, Baltimore, MD, United States, 2Physiology, Uni. Texas Health Science Center-San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States, 3Neurology, Uni. Texas Health Science Center-San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States

Synopsis

Despite the high clinical and pre-clinical value of fMRI, its success depends on the identification of the underlying neurophysiological basis of the fMRI BOLD signal. In previously reported simultaneous electrophysiology and fMRI studies, experiments were limited by the poor spatial resolution or poor source localization of intra-cranial or surface EEG techniques employed to record neural activity. In order to overcome these limitations, we have developed a method that allows concurrent whole brain fMRI acquisition and 32-channel intra-cerebral electrophysiological recording in the rat brain.

Introduction

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a potent noninvasive tool to study brain function in normal and disease human populations and in animal models of disease. The success of this tool is based on the understanding of the relationship between neuronal activity and the fMRI signal, as measured by blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) contrast. Concurrent electrophysiology and fMRI have been previously reported1-6. Given the noninvasiveness nature, scalp EEG recording has been widely used in human studies. However, this technique suffers from poor source localization of neural activity, which is particularly an issue in studying spontaneous ongoing brain activity. In studies involving intra-cerebral electrophysiological recording, a limited number of micro-electrodes were typically employed, thus having low spatial coverage. In order to overcome these limitations, we have developed a method that allows concurrent whole brain fMRI acquisition and 32-channel intra-cerebral electrophysiological recording in the rat brain.

Methods and Analysis

Electrode implantation: 250-300g Sprague Dawley rats were anesthetized and chronically implanted with two 16-channel silicon micro-electrodes (Neuronexus) into the striatum. Reference and ground wires were soldered to independent brass screws anchored on the cerebellum. MRI: Experiments were conducted on a Bruker 9.4T scanner. A single-turn surface coil was placed directly over the skull encompassing the area of the electrode placement. A T1-weighted sequence (FLASH; FOV: 35x35mm2) was used for slice localization. Resting state fMRI data was acquired using a gradient echo-planar imaging (EPI; FOV: 30x30mm2). Imaging data was processed and analyzed using AFNI software. Electrophysiological recording: Local field potentials (LFP) were recorded continuously using a multichannel data acquisition system (Plexon) and amplified at a gain of 2000, notch filtered at 60 Hz, and digitally sampled at 10 kHz. Data pre-processing: LFP data was pre-processed and analyzed in MATLAB and EEGLAB software. MRI-induced artifacts in the LFP traces were removed in the following steps: each 60-ms segment of artifact data was first replaced by linear interpolation and then low-passed filtered to 400Hz and down-sampled to 1kHz. The linear interpolation minimizes ringing effects from high frequency artifact spikes. The artifact segments were then interpolated by cubic-spline with data from 35ms before and 35ms immediately after the artifacts. LFP data were then low-passed filtered to 110Hz and down-sampled to 250Hz. This artifact removal method was evaluated in clean EEG data. Spectra with and without the artifact removal procedure were essentially identical, suggesting that this method preserves the spectral content of the original LFP signal.

Results and Discussion

The chronic implantation of bilateral silicon electrodes, into the rat striatum, introduced artifacts which were noticeable in T1-weighted anatomical images (Fig1A) and in single-shot EPI images (Fig1B). There was apparent signal loss in tissue surrounding the electrodes. The temporal signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in these regions is about 5%, while the temporal SNR in unaffected regions is about 2%. There were no aberrant fluctuations on the temporal profile of the time courses within the electrode track (Fig2A) in comparison to normal tissue (Fig2B). The raw electrophysiological recordings were contaminated with typical MRI-induced artifacts resulting from the strong alternations of the field gradients (Fig3A; representative trace from a single channel) during imaging. The artifacts were visible throughout all 32-channels and were readily removed in a multi-step method we developed and described above (Fig3B). As can be seen, the integrity of the recording was preserved after the denoising procedure.

Conclusion

We have developed a method that allows concurrent whole brain fMRI acquisition and 32-channel intra-cerebral electrophysiological recording in the rat brain. We used commercial micro-electrodes and recording system, and did not require customized software and hardware, thus this method can be readily adapted by other labs. We have also developed a method in which the MRI-induced electrophysiological artifacts can be removed. Importantly, the recording sites covered bilateral striatum ranging from dorsal to ventral domain, and our preparation permitted repeated experiments from the same animal. The ability of dense electrophysiological recording coupled with concurrent fMRI opens the possibility to further explore the neurophysiological basis of the resting state fMRI signal.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH.

References

1. Logothetis NK et al. Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature. 2001; 412:150-157.

2. Shmuel A et al. Negative functional MRI response correlates with decreases in neural activity in monkey visual area V1. Nature Neuroscience. 2006; 9(4):569-577.

3. Vincent JL et al. Intrinsic functional architecture in the anaesthetized monkey brain. Nature. 2007; 447:83-88.

4. Scholvinck ML et al. Neural basis of global resting-state fMRI activity. PNAS. 2010; 107(22):10238-10243.

5. Pan WJ et al. Broadband local field potentials correlate with spontaneous fluctuations in functional magnetic resonance imaging signals in the rat somatosensory cortex under isoflurane anesthesia. Brain Connectivity. 2011; 1(2):119-131.

6. Pan WJ et al. Infraslow LFP correlates to resting-state fMRI BOLD signals. Neuroimage. 2013; 74:288-297.

Figures

Figure 1: In-vivo anatomical and functional scans of the rat brain with bilateral implantation of silicon micro-electrodes. A. T1-image acquired wuth FLASH sequence. B. Image acquired with gradient-recall single-shot EPI sequence.

Figure 2: Voxel time course from red and blue boxes outlined in Fig1. A. and B. Represents time courses from voxels within the electrode track and from unaffected regions, respectively. The temporal SNR in (A) was 5% while it was 2% in (B).

Figure 3: A representative trace showing raw LFP signal from an electrode in the ventral striatum, with MRI-induced artifacts (A) and with the artifacts removed (B).



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
3785