Chung-Ki Wong1, Vadim Zotev1, Masaya Misaki1, Raquel Phillips1, Qingfei Luo1, and Jerzy Bodurka1,2,3
1Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, United States, 2College of Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States, 3Center for Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States
Synopsis
We
utilized an automatic EEG-assisted retrospective motion correction (aE-REMCOR)
to improve rs-fMRI connectivity analysis. The aE-REMCOR utilizes EEG data to automatically
correct for head movements in fMRI on a slice-by-slice basis. We compared the
results of seed-based (posterior cingulate cortex) default-mode network (DMN)
connectivity analysis performed with and without aE-REMCOR. The aE-REMCOR
reduced the motion-induced position-dependent error in the DMN connectivity
analysis. The results show the importance of slice-by-slice fMRI motion
corrections to improve rs-fMRI connectivity accuracy especially when the entire
group of subjects exhibits rapid head motions, and also provide incentive for
conducting simultaneous EEG&fMRI.Purpose
Recently
an automatic EEG-assisted retrospective motion correction (aE-REMCOR) method
that utilizes EEG data to correct for head movements in fMRI on a
slice-by-slice basis was developed.
1,2 The aE-REMCOR was shown to be capable of substantially removing
head movements in the fMRI dataset.
1 Here we examined the utility of this method to
improve rs-fMRI connectivity analysis.
Methods
The
aE-REMCOR
employs independent component analysis on the preprocessed EEG data and automatically
identifies independent components (ICs) related to head motions for fMRI data
correction with AFNI3 3dTfitter. The simultaneous EEG&fMRI were conducted on a GE MR750
3T MRI with an 8-channel head coil and 32ch MR-compatible EEG system (Brain
Products GmbH). For fMRI, an EPI sequence was used (TR/TE=2000/30 ms, FOV/slice
thickness/gap=240/2.9/0.5 mm, 34 axial slices, SENSE=2, and voxel =1.875×1.875×2.9
mm3, scan time 526 s). First 3 EPI volumes (6 s) were excluded to
allow the fMRI signal to reach steady state.
All fMRI analysis was performed in
AFNI. When aE-REMCOR was applied, it was employed before a series of standard fMRI
preprocessing steps (slice-timing correction, volume registration, and registration
to the Talairach coordinates4). Then the fMRI data was spatially
blurred to 4-mm FWHM and temporally band-pass filtered (0.01-0.08Hz).
Functional connectivity of the default mode network (DMN) in 86 resting scans of
16 subjects was examined using GLM-based correlation analysis. A spherical seed
ROI with radius 5 mm was centered at the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC)
(Talairach coordinate: (0,-51,22)5) (green cross-hairs in Figs.2-4).
Nuisance covariates included the average signals of the cerebrospinal fluid,
white matter, and 6 rigid body motion parameters. Correlation difference
between the data with and without aE-REMCOR was evaluated. We also quantified
the correlation changes at the nodes of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC:
(0,49,2)), lateral parietal cortex (LatPar-L: (-45,-60,32), LatPar-R:
(43,-60,29)), and hippocampal formation (HF-L: (-22,-19,-15), HF-R:
(22,-19,-15)) of the DMN5.
Results
Fig.1 depicts the distributions of the motion severity (
f) and κ
f for each scan, where
f = mean(|
D''|), κ
f = kurtosis(
D''),
D is the maximum displacement of the voxels for each brain volume,
and
D'' is the second derivative of
D with respect to TR (the average acceleration of the head motions
during the scan). Prolonged periods of rapid head movements cause a more Gaussian
distribution of
D'', a large
f and small κ
f. Occasional rapid head movements
give a moderate
f and a large κ
f.
The absence of significant head movements gives a small
f and a small κ
f. Fig.2 plots the single subject
correlation map in a scan with some occasional rapid head movements (
f =0.024, κ
f=57.5). In Fig.2a, stripes are observed in the correlation
map without aE-REMCOR. These stripy features originate from the signal loss in neighboring
imaging slices caused by the rapid head motions. When aE-REMCOR is applied, the
contrast of the stripes reduces (Fig.2b). Fig.3 plots the group correlation
difference calculated with and without the aE-REMCOR procedures with occasional
(κ
f >40)
and prolonged (
f >0.10) rapid head
movements (Fig.1). Similar motion-induced stripes can be observed. The stripes
disappear when all the 86 resting scans are considered (Fig.4c). This shows the
reduced significance of the motion artifacts on the DMN connectivity when sufficient
samples are considered. For the motion group with κ
f >40,
correlation at PCC was decreased by 0.017 (
p=0.004),
and correlation at HF-R was increased by 0.019 (
p=0.018). For the motion group with κ
f >40 or
f >0.10, correlation at PCC was decreased by 0.012 (
p=0.0027). For the whole group analysis,
correlations at PCC and LatPar-L were decreased by 0.003 (
p=0.028) and 0.006 (
p=0.024),
and correlations at HF-L and HF-R were increased by 0.006 (
p=0.029) and 0.008 (
p=0.006).
In all cases, a slight decrease was observed in the correlation at the seed
ROI.
Summary
The
default mode network connectivity was analyzed with and without aE-REMCOR in 86
resting scans. The aE-REMCOR reduces the position-dependent error in the DMN connectivity
measurement. The results show the importance of the slice-by-slice fMRI motion
corrections to improve the accuracy of the functional connectivity analysis,
especially when the entire group of subjects exhibits significant rapid head
motions.
Acknowledgements
This
works is supported by DOD award W81XWH-12-1-0607.References
[1] Wong CK, Zotev
V, Misaki M, et al. An automatic EEG-assisted retrospective motion correction
for fMRI (aE-REMCOR). Proceedings of Int.Soc. Magn. Reson. Med. 2015;2562.
[2]
Zotev V, Yuan H, Phillips R., et
al. EEG-assisted retrospective motion correction for fMRI: E-REMCOR.
NeuroImage. 2012;63:698-712.
[3] Cox, RW. AFNI: software for analysis and
visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput. Biomed.
Res. 1996;29:162-173.
[4] Talairach J, Tourmoux P. Co-plannar stereotaxic atlas
of the human brain. Thieme Medical Publishers, New York, 1998.
[5] Van Dijk KRA,
Hedden T, Venkataraman A, et al. Intrinsic functional connectivity as a tool
for human connectomics: theory, properties, and optimization. J.
Neurophysiology. 2010;103:297-321.