Hsiao-Ying Wey1, R Matthew Hutchison2, Bruce R Rosen1, and Joseph B Mandeville1
1A. A. Martinos Center, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, United States, 2Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States
Synopsis
In this study, we present simultaneous PET/MRI
study with pharmacological challenges targeting the μ-opioid receptor system in
nonhuman primates to determine the effects of opioid drug on static and dynamic
functional connectivity. Mu-opioid receptor occupancy (quantified with PET) and
CBV-fMRI signals show dose-dependent reductions to opioid antagonist (naloxone)
challenges. Using brain regions showing PET signal changes as seeds, static FC
analysis shows an increase in local (within the seed region) and distal (motor
cortex) connectivity with putamen after naloxone. Dynamic FC patterns were also
modulated with naloxone as indicated by weaker pairwise correlations and larger
number of dynamic state transitions.Purpose
Functional connectivity (FC) can be inferred
from spontaneous fMRI signal fluctuations arising from low frequency brain
activity
1. Assessment of FC has not only revealed the spatiotemporal
organization of functional networks in the healthy and diseased human brain
1,2,
but has also showed homologous organization between nonhuman primates and
humans
3. The majority of studies investigating FC have applied
techniques that assume temporal stationary throughout the scan period
1-3.
Recently, it has been shown that FC can undergo dynamic changes within timescales
much shorter than a typical 5-10 min scan
4. The time-varying characteristic
of FC may relate to spontaneously shifting of network states and might be of mechanistic
importance of FC
4,5.
To date, there has been limited investigation into the effects of drugs on either
static or dynamic properties of FC leaving many open questions as to the
relationship between ongoing functional coupling and the underlying endogenous neurotransmission
6,7.
In this study, we investigate pharmacological modulations of static and dynamic
FC to opioid receptor selective drugs in nonhuman primates using simultaneous
PET/MRI, allowing for the evaluation of FC changes before/after drug administration
and concurrent quantification of μ-opioid receptor occupancies.
Methods
Ten simultaneous PET/MRI scans were acquired on two
NHPs (male macaques, ~12 kg) anesthetized with isoflurane.
Images were acquired on a 3T Siemens TIM-Trio with a BrainPET insert and a
custom 8-channel coil. PET/MRI scans were acquired from each animal using a
μ-opioid radiotracers, [11C]carfentanil. Radiotracer (~10 mCi) was
given as a bolus-infusion to obtain steady state equilibrium. PET data were
collected for 90 min, stored in list mode and binned into 1-min frames. CBV-fMRI
data were obtained following an iron oxide (Feraheme, 10 ug/kg, i.v.)8
injection. Graded doses of an opioid receptor antagonist, naloxone (baseline, 0.005,
0.01, 0.03, and 0.05 mg/kg) were given intravenously at 36 min post-radiotracer
injection.
PET/MRI data were motion corrected, skull
stripped, spatially smoothed, and registered to a standard NHP atlas9. PET data analyzed for receptor binding potentials were
referenced to a non-displaceable compartment (BPND) using the simplified
reference tissue model10. A gamma-variant function was used to model
the PET and fMRI temporal response to drug challenge using a GLM. fMRI
time-series were detrended and bandpass-filtered to 0.01-0.1 Hz before FC
analysis. White matter, CSF signal and 6 motion parameters were used as nuisances.
Fourteen regions were selected based on high-to-low PET BPND values.
For static FC, fMRI data was broken into three 20-min (pre-, post-, and during
drug infusion) sections. A voxel-wise, seed-based correlation analysis were
calculated. For dynamic FC, a sliding window correlation analysis was applied
on the truncated time-series data (60 sec windows with 50% overlap). ROI-to-ROI
correlation coefficient within each window was calculated. The average
correlation matrix was computed to show the overall dynamic patterns under
different conditions. A k-mean clustering (k = 7) approach was used to group
the dynamic FC into diffident functional states and the number of state transitions
was calculate.
Results and Discussion
Naloxone induced robust dose-dependent μ-opioid
receptor BP
ND and percent CBV changes (Fig 1). The largest BP
ND reductions were observed in the
thalamus and caudate, while the largest CBV changes were observed in the
putamen (Fig 1). This spatial
mismatch between drug-induced PET and fMRI signals implies potential
modulations of downstream brain activity
11. Among the 14 regions
analyzed, an increase in local (within putamen) and distal (motor cortex and
supplementary motor area) FC with putamen was found after naloxone challenge (Fig 2). Interestingly, an early human
study investigating the effect of buprenorphine (mu-opioid partial agonist) on
static FC showed a decrease between cortical (motor cortex, insula) and
subcortical (thalamus) FC with putamen
6. Cerebellum, an area devoid
of μ-opioid receptors, showed an increase in FC with the thalamus during the drug
injection period. Dynamic FC patterns were also modulated with naloxone as
indicated by weaker pairwise correlations between regions (Fig 3) and larger number of dynamic state transitions. More sophisticated dynamic FC is
currently ongoing to investigate the connectivity pattern of each functional
state. Group-level analysis to evaluate dose-dependent modulation of FC will
also be conducted. Future studies to directly compare the effects of μ-opioid
agonists on static and dynamic FC are also of interest.
Conclusions
Using simultaneous PET/MRI with pharmacological
challenges in NHPs, we showed the engagement of the opioid system and the
resulting CBV-fMRI changes in limbic basal ganglia. We found evidence of pharmacological
modulation of both static and dynamic FC patterns. Simultaneous PET/MRI provides a powerful tool for studying the impact of
neurotransmission on brain function, and has great potential to further our
understanding of the neurochemical mechanisms underlying large-scale brain
networks.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NIDA K99DA037928
to HYW.References
1. Biswal et al., MRM, 1995. 2. Biswal et al.,
PNAS, 2010. 3. Vincent et al., Nature, 2007. 4. Chang C and Glover GH,
NeuroImage, 2010. 5. Hutchison RM, NeuroImage, 2014. 6. Upadhyay et al.,
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011. 7. Nasrallah et al., NeuroImage, 2014. 8.
Mandeville JB, NeuroImage, 2013. 9. McLauren et al., NeuroImage, 2010. 10.
Lammertsma, NeuroImage, 1996. 11. Wey et al., ISMRM 2015.