Fuyixue Wang1, Paul Hamilton2, Brian Knutson2, Ian Gotlib2, Matthew Sacchet2, Hershel Mehta2, Christina Schreiner2, Dawn Holley3, Fred Chin3, Bin Shen3, Greg Zaharchuk3, Mehdi Khalighi4, and Gary Glover3
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, People's Republic of, 2Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States, 3Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States, 4Applied Science Lab, GE Healthcare, Menlo Park, CA, United States
Synopsis
The release of dopamine during reward tasks is
modulated by major depressive disorder (MDD). In this study of MDD, we used simultaneous
PET/fMRI to detect the neurochemical changes of dopamine and neurovascular
activity through BOLD contrast during two sequential monetary incentive delay
tasks in a single scan. Several modeling methods were proposed and evaluated for
dynamic PET data. Six participants with MDD were studied. The results of the
group analysis of PET and fMRI show significant effects of dopamine release in
ventral striatum bilaterally, close to the nucleus accumbens, and significant BOLD signals in putamen
bilaterally during reward tasks.Purpose
The release of dopamine (DA) during reward tasks
is modulated by major depressive disorder (MDD)
1. This multi-modal study of MDD
used PET and fMRI simultaneously to detect and measure the neurochemical changes
of DA by PET and neurovascular activity through BOLD contrast during monetary
incentive delay tasks. Specifically, in this pilot study, different modeling
methods of dynamic PET data were proposed and evaluated for concurrent PET-fMRI
study with two sequential monetary incentive delay (MID) tasks in a single
scan.
Methods
Data
acquisition: We simultaneously acquired PET and
fMRI data on a PET/MR system (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee). Six participants with
major depressive disorder underwent a 50min or 40min PET scan with [11C]
raclopride and a 32min MR scan simultaneously. During the scan, participants performed
two 10-min MID tasks (high ($5) and low ($1) stakes) sequentially, each divided
into two conditions including reward (winning or not losing money) and
punishment (losing money).
fMRI
analysis: Slice-timing correction, motion
correction, spatial smoothing and a quadratic detrending were performed for all
fMRI data. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-stage mixed effect
model. In the first stage, voxel-wise regression analysis of the data of each
subject was performed. The hemodynamic response was modeled by convolving the
task design with a canonical hemodynamic response function 2. Each subject's
brain data were normalized to the standard template provided by the Montreal
Neurological Institute (MNI) template using SPM8 3. In the second stage,
one-sample t tests were calculated over images of the interested contrasts to obtain
group activation maps.
PET analysis:
For PET data, statistical analysis was performed using general linear model
(GLM). The task related regressors were derived from the results
obtained in the previous experiments in which variations due to
endogenous dopamine release in the striatum were modeled using two exponential
functions with time constants of 3 min. To detect task-related signal changes in
response to two sequential MID tasks, three methods, quadratic fitting, gamma
fitting of the average signal of striatum region with 1st or 2nd order detrend,
have been tried by including them in the GLM as covariates of no interest. They
were compared with the conventional kinetic model LSSRM 4.
Kinetic simulations were performed
to simulate the time-activity curves (TACs) of the whole brain in order to evaluate the various modeling methods. In the first set of simulations, different amounts of
task-related signal decreases were added to the TACs of voxels in striatum
region and the proportion of activated voxels were calculated to examine the sensitivity
of detecting ligand displacement. The second set of simulations examined the
effect of noise on detection of signal using different modeling methods, and
tested the false positive rate when there was no task added.
The
analysis of the human studies used a GLM model constructed with different
modeling methods as described above to obtain the activation maps during the
two MID tasks. Group analysis was also performed using one-sample t test.
Results
The
results of kinetic simulations are shown in Fig. 1. The sensitivity of all
methods to detect signal changes in striatum increased with the decrease of
noise and the rise of signal changes. Fig. 2 shows examples of TACs for
striatum and cerebellum and their corresponding fitting curves using different methods
in the simulation and the human experiment. Single subject t statistical maps
acquired from the three methods are compared in Fig. 3.
Fig. 4 illustrates the
results of group analysis of both PET (using quadratic fitting) and fMRI. The
significant effects due to dopamine release were found in ventral striatum
bilaterally, close to the nucleus accumbens in both high and low stake tasks. Significant
BOLD signals were located in putamen bilaterally when subjects were studied
during reward tasks. But significance was only found at right putamen during
high stake punishment tasks.
Discussion and Conclusion
The PET kinetic simulations demonstrate the
feasibility of all the methods to detect task-related signal changes in
striatum with relatively low false positive rate. The agreements of the fitting
curves and the single subject t statistical maps indicate the similar
estimation characteristics of the three modeling methods.
Compared with the
conventional kinetic model, quadratic and gamma fitting for PET data are more
simple and flexible for different experimental designs and task strategies of
concurrent PET-fMRI, and only quadratic fitting shows activations in striatum
in group analysis in this study. The results of group analysis demonstrate the
dopamine release and fMRI activations in the ventral striatum during the MID
reward tasks for MDD patients.
Acknowledgements
We
acknowledge GE Healthcare for assistance.
This work was supported by NIH EB01589,
Weston Havens Foundation. The authors thank Jingyuan Chen for help.References
1. Knutson
B, Bhanji J P, Cooney R E, et al. Neural responses to monetary incentives in
major depression. Biological psychiatry, 2008, 63(7): 686-692.
2. Friston
K J, Fletcher P, Josephs O, et al. Event-related fMRI: characterizing
differential responses. Neuroimage, 1998, 7(1): 30-40.
3. http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/
4. Alpert N M, Badgaiyan R D, Livni E, et al. A
novel method for noninvasive detection of neuromodulatory changes in specific
neurotransmitter systems. Neuroimage, 2003, 19(3): 1049-1060.