Venkata Veerendranadh Chebrolu1, Brice Fernandez2, Suresh E Joel1, Bharath Sundar1, Luca Marinelli3, Rakesh Mullick1, Victor I Spoormaker4, Michael Czisch4, and Thomas K Foo3
1GE Global Research, Bangalore, India, 2GE Healthcare, Munich, Germany, 3GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY, United States, 4Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany
Synopsis
In
this work we compare whole brain functional connectivity (FC) estimates from
R2* resting-sate fMRI (rs-fMRI) with BOLD rs-fMRI. Thirty-two healthy subjects
were imaged using three-echo multi-echo echo-planar-imaging (MEPI) under
institutional guidelines. FC matrices based on structural and functional brain
parcellation schemes were computed for individual BOLD echoes, R2* and M
(initial magnetization approximated by BOLD signal at TE=0). Results tend to
show that M might be helpful to decouple flow effects. Positive between network
connectivity was observed in BOLD, M and R2* derived matrices. Anti-correlations
observed between networks in BOLD and M were significantly lesser in R2*
derived matrices.Introduction
Functional connectivity (FC) is typically
assessed using blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal contrast (1,2). BOLD signal
contrast dependents on many factors including cerebral metabolic rate for oxygen
(CMRO2) and blood flow (3). Literature tends to show that multi-echo
echo-planar-imaging (MEPI) may be useful to decouple CMRO2 and flow changes (4-6). In this work we estimate
transverse relaxation rate (R2*) using MEPI and compare whole brain FC estimates
from R2* resting-sate fMRI (rs-fMRI) with BOLD rs-fMRI.
Methods
Imaging: Thirty-two healthy subjects were imaged using three-echo
MEPI on GE 3T Discovery MR750 scanner using a 32 channel brain coil under
institutional guidelines. The MEPI acquisition had the following parameters: repetition-time
(TR) 2.56s, first echo-time of 12ms and echo-spacing of 16.9ms, ASSET factor
2.0, flip-angle 90
o, 36 slices per TR, image matrix of 64×64,
field-of-view 220mm, slice thickness 3mm,
gap of 0.4mm between slices, and at total of 184 time-points for rs-fMRI. A 1mm
isotropic resolution T1-weighted MRI was also obtained.
Pre-processing: R2* and M (initial magnetization
approximated by BOLD signal at TE=0) were estimated from the natural logarithm
of multi-echo data using least-squares estimation. The preprocessing of BOLD, M
and R2* time-courses included motion correction, registration to MNI atlas,
physiological nuisance removal including global signal regression, spatial
smoothing using a 7 mm FWHM Gaussian
filter and temporal band-pass filtering (0.01 to 0.1 Hz).
Seed-based FC Map: Thirteen 6-mm radius spherical regions were drawn around
seed-points associated with functional networks obtained from previously
published work (7) and manually placed in specific
Brodmann areas. The mean time-course for each seed-region was computed. Then, for
each voxel in the brain, the Pearson correlation-coefficient between the voxel
and the seed time-course was computed to create the FC map. Correlation-coefficient
was converted to z-score using Fisher transform.
Parcel-based FC Graph: FreeSurfer brain
regions (8) were used to label
86 structural parcels in the T1-weighted image. The correlation-coefficient
between two parcel mean rs-fMRI time-courses was computed and converted to
z-scores as the FC measure for the parcel pair. Z-scores were computed between
every pair of 86 FreeSurfer parcel time-courses producing an 86×86 FC graph (matrix).
Similarly, a 90×90 FC matrix was computed using 90 functional parcels (9). Once, the FC matrices were
computed for each subject in the cohort, the group averages were computed to
generate the average connectivity matrix for the cohort.
Jaccard Similarity: Jaccard similarity between the connectivity
matrices from BOLD, R2* and M was computed. Similarity was measured separately
for positive (>=0.2), negative (<=-0.2) and near zero (>-0.2 and
<0.2) FC z-score values. Jaccard similarity for two matrices
A and
B was computed
as
n(
A &&
B)/
n(
A ||
B), where
n() denotes the cardinality.
Results
Typical functional
networks were observed in Echo 2 (TE » 30ms, which is
the conventional BOLD echo time) and R2* based rs-fMRI. Figures 1 shows functional
connectivity measured using BOLD signal at echo 1 and echo 2, M and R2* in a
representative subject for the default mode network (DMN). Figure 2 shows the
same comparison for the primary visual network. Echo 2 and R2* derived FC maps
though similar were not identical (shown by blue arrows in Figure 1). Figure 3 compares
the group average FC matrices computed using echo1 and echo 2 with those from M
and R2* using 86 FreeSurfer structural parcels. Figure 4 shows the same
comparison with 90 functional parcels. Table 1 (Figure 5) shows the Jaccard
similarity between the FC matrices from BOLD, R2* and M.
Discussion
Contrast in the BOLD signal at shorter echo-times
is expected to be primarily driven by changes in flow (M). The echo 2 FC matrix
has combination of flow and CMRO2 effects as shown by the Jaccard similarity
with M and R2*. Results tend to show that M might be helpful to decouple flow
effects. Connectivity matrix computed using structural parcels showed positive
connectivity for parcels with indices less than 19 (sub cortical regions) on
BOLD, M and R2*. However, the structural parcels of the cortical regions were
weakly connected on R2*. This could be because of the inhomogeneity of the R2*
time-courses in the cortical structural parcels. The connectivity matrix for
R2* using functional parcels, however, showed significant within network
connectivity (clusters along the diagonal) for cortical and sub-cortical
parcels. Positive between network connectivity also survives in R2* derived
matrices, however, the anti-correlations observed between networks in echo 1,
echo 2 and M were significantly lesser in R2* derived matrices.
Conclusions
R2* rs-fMRI may be
useful in decoupling flow and CMRO2 effects and improve the understanding of
network connectivity.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Garcia-Garcia
I, Jurado MA, Garolera M, et al. Functional network centrality in obesity: A
resting-state and task fMRI study. Psychiatry research 2015.
2. Ogawa
S, Lee TM, Kay AR, Tank DW. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast
dependent on blood oxygenation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
of the United States of America 1990;87(24):9868-9872.
3. Diemling
M, Barth M, Moser E. Quantification of signal changes in gradient recalled echo
FMRI. Magnetic resonance imaging 1997;15(7):753-762.
4. Glover
GH, Lemieux SK, Drangova M, Pauly JM. Decomposition of inflow and blood oxygen
level-dependent (BOLD) effects with dual-echo spiral gradient-recalled echo
(GRE) fMRI. Magnetic resonance in medicine : official journal of the Society of
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine / Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
1996;35(3):299-308.
5. Wennerberg
AB, Jonsson T, Forssberg H, Li TQ. A comparative fMRI study: T2*-weighted
imaging versus R2* mapping. NMR in biomedicine 2001;14(1):41-47.
6. Chebrolu
VV, Joel SE, Fernandez B, et al. Functional connectivity assessment using R2*
resting-state functional MRI. Proceedings 23rd Scientific Meeting,
International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Toronto, Ontario,
Canada; 2015. p. 3965.
7. De
Luca M, Beckmann CF, De Stefano N, Matthews PM, Smith SM. fMRI resting state
networks define distinct modes of long-distance interactions in the human
brain. NeuroImage 2006;29(4):1359-1367.
8. Fischl
B. FreeSurfer. NeuroImage 2012;62(2):774-781.
9. Shirer
WR, Ryali S, Rykhlevskaia E, Menon V, Greicius MD. Decoding subject-driven
cognitive states with whole-brain connectivity patterns. Cerebral cortex
2012;22(1):158-165.