Synopsis
Clustering of resting state fMRI signals for extraction of functional brain networks has been showed to provide value in recent times. Independent component analysis (ICA) is the most commonly used technique to extract functional brain networks. More recently non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) has been successfully utilized for identification of brain functional networks in single-subject resting state fMRI data. NMF may provide complementary information for analyzing resting state fMRI data. However, the technique has not been extended to provide group inferences. This is non-trivial, since the components obtained from single subject NMF is not ordered. Using temporal concatenation, similar to group ICA, we introduce a new framework for back reconstruction of individual subject from group analysis using NMF. This framework will make comparisons between groups possible for NMF. Introduction
Clustering of resting state
fMRI signals for extraction of functional brain networks has been showed to
provide value in recent times [1, 2]. Independent component analysis (ICA) is the
most commonly used technique to extract functional brain networks [3]. More recently
non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) has been successfully utilized for
identification of brain functional networks in single-subject resting state fMRI
data [5, 6]. NMF may provide complementary information for analyzing resting
state fMRI data [5, 6]. However, the technique has not been extended to provide
group inferences. This is non-trivial, since the components obtained from
single subject NMF are not ordered. Using temporal concatenation, similar to
group ICA [7], we introduce a new framework for back reconstruction of
individual subject from group analysis using NMF. This framework will make
comparisons between groups possible for NMF.
Theory & Methods
NMF
[4] is a low-rank approximation of a given feature space where, non-negativity
constraint is imposed on the features. For non-negative $$$N\times T$$$ matrix, $$$X$$$ and
a positive integer $$$k<\min(N,T)$$$ NMF
finds non-negative matrices $$$W$$$ and $$$H$$$ of sizes $$$N\times k$$$ and $$$k\times T$$$ respectively,
$$X\approx{WH}$$
that minimize the following
objective function,
$$D=\min_{W,H}{||X-WH||}^2$$
NMF is used for blind clustering of functional networks in the rs-fMRI BOLD signals. In
context of brain functional networks in fMRI data, if $$$X$$$ matrix represents the rs-fMRI data for given subject
then each columns of $$$W$$$ represents
the functional maps and the rows of the matrix $$$H$$$ are the
representative time courses of the corresponding functional maps.
In this work, a method to combine all subjects into an
NMF analysis to estimate a single set of components is suggested. The NMF
components of individual subjects are then back reconstructed from the combined
coefficients matrix $$$H$$$. This approach enables the ordering the components in
different subjects in the same way.
The proposed method can be illustrated using a two-subject
case; consider single voxel data having two time points ($$$D_1 $$$,$$$D_2 $$$)
from two subjects (subject $$$S_1$$$ and subject $$$S_2$$$ ),
$$S_1=\begin{bmatrix}D_1 & D_2 \end{bmatrix}$$
And
$$S_2=\begin{bmatrix}D_1 & D_2 \end{bmatrix}$$
The
two subjects can be concatenated in to a single vector as,
$$X=\begin{bmatrix}S_1 & S_2 \end{bmatrix}$$
After
applying NMF for two components,
$$\begin{bmatrix}S_1 & S_2
\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}C_1 & C_2 \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}{Coff}_{1,1}
& {Coff}_{1,2} & {Coff}_{1,3} &{Coff}_{1,4} \\{Coff}_{2,1} &
{Coff}_{2,2} & {Coff}_{2,3} & {Coff}_{2,4} \end{bmatrix}$$
Where the elements of $$$W$$$ matrix $$$C_1$$$ and $$$C_2$$$ are the group components and $$$Coff$$$ are the elements of basis matrix $$$H$$$. Figure 1 shows
group NMF block diagram. To back-reconstruct the
individual subject components we multiply the inverse of partition of coefficients matrix $$$H$$$ corresponding to the desired subject’s data with the corresponding partition of concatenated
subject matrix $$$X$$$.
$$\overbrace{S_1}=S_1\star\begin{bmatrix}{Coff}_{1,1} &
{Coff}_{1,2} \\{Coff}_{2,1} &
{Coff}_{2,2} \end{bmatrix}^{-1}$$
And
$$\overbrace{S_2}=S_2\star\begin{bmatrix}{Coff}_{1,3} &
{Coff}_{1,4} \\{Coff}_{2,3} &
{Coff}_{2,4} \end{bmatrix}^{-1}$$
Figure 2 gives the back reconstruction block diagram. In
practical case to handle the scale of the fMRI data, before concatenation of
individual subject data, principal component analysis (PCA) based
dimensionality reduction on time dimension [7] is done for each subject. The reduction
parameter is chosen such that, the original data should not be overly reduced
to avoid losing important information.
Results
Resting
state fMRI scans were acquired on forty participants, each scanned on a 3 Tesla GE MRI scanner. Each scan consists of 6 minutes of BOLD
sensitized 2D multi-band EPI acquisition with voxel dimensions of 2 x 2 x 3 mm
with a sampling rate of 1.11 Hz (TR = 900 ms, TE = 30ms). Motion correction is
applied on scan data followed by registration to T1-weighted image, followed by
registration to atlas, removal of nuisances using aCompCor [8], spatial
smoothing using 4 mm isotropic Gaussian window, band pass temporal filter with
passband between 0.01 and 0.1 Hz.
For
group analysis, PCA based dimensionality reduction is applied in temporal
direction to reduce time points with reduction ratio of 5. After PCA, data from
all participants are concatenated in temporal direction followed by NMF to get
group maps. Low-rank approximation using NMF up to 30 components is used, which
gives 30 components some of which are neuronal and others are noise induced.
For individual subject back reconstruction, the partition
of the basis matrix corresponding to a given subject is projected back on the
original subject data as given in equation (6). Figure 3 shows
default mode network (DMN), Attention Network (AN) and Motor Network (MN) maps for
the group and back reconstructed for the individual.
Conclusions
In this paper, a framework
for group inferences of individual subject from group NMF
using temporal concatenation is introduced. The proposed framework can act as
complementary technique for ICA based group inferences from fMRI data.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.
Van Den Heuvel, Martijn P., and Hilleke E.
Hulshoff Pol, "Exploring the brain network: a review on resting-state fMRI
functional connectivity." European Neuro psychopharmacology 20.8
(2010): 519-534.
2.
Van Dijk, Koene RA, et al. "Intrinsic
functional connectivity as a tool for human connectomics: theory, properties,
and optimization." Journal of neurophysiology103.1 (2010): 297-321.
3.
Calhoun, V. D., et al. "A method for
making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component
analysis." Human brain mapping 14.3 (2001): 140-151.
4.
Lee, Daniel D., and H. Sebastian Seung.
"Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix
factorization." Nature 401.6755 (1999): 788-791.
5.
Lee, Jong-Hwan, et al. "Investigation of
spectrally coherent resting-state networks using non-negative matrix
factorization for functional MRI data." International Journal of Imaging
Systems and Technology 21.2 (2011): 211-222.
6.
Mahesh Panicker, Bhushan Patil, Ek Tsoon Tan, Suresh Joel, ”
Blind Functional Clustering of Resting State fMRI using Non-Negative Matrix
Factorization”’ 21st Annual Meeting of the Organization for Human Brain
Mapping, OHBM 2015.
7.
Karhunen, Juha, et al. "On neural blind
separation with noise suppression and redundancy
reduction." International Journal of Neural Systems 8.02 (1997):
219-237.
8.
Behzadi, Yashar, et al.”A component based
noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI.”
Neuroimage 37.1 (2007): 90-101.