Synopsis
The hippocampus is significantly affected in
cognitive impairment, including Alzheimer’s disease. Cerebrovascular
endothelial dysfunction (CeV-ED) plays an essential role in the initiation and
progression of cerebrovascular disease (CeV-D) and cognitive decline. CeV-ED
can be assessed with the evaluation of cerebrovascular reactivity (CeV-R) by
performing MRI studies with a respiratory challenge, such as the manipulation
of end-tidal partial pressure of CO2
(PetCO2) and O2 (PetO2). In the presented studies, ASL imaging and T2* mapping were
evaluated for the assessment of the CeV-R in the hippocampus to determine the
benefits and disadvantages of each imaging method and to facilitate the imaging
method selection for future application studies. PURPOSE
The hippocampus is significantly affected in
cognitive impairment, including Alzheimer’s disease
1-5. Cerebrovascular
endothelial dysfunction (CeV-ED) plays an essential role in the initiation and
progression of cerebrovascular disease (CeV-D) and cognitive decline
6.
CeV-ED can be assessed with the evaluation of cerebrovascular reactivity (CeV-R)
by performing blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD)
7, arterial spin
labeling (ASL) imaging
8 or T
2* mapping
9 with
a respiratory challenge, such as the manipulation of end-tidal partial pressure of CO
2 (PetCO
2) and O
2
(PetO
2). In contrast to BOLD imaging, ASL imaging with
a respiratory challenge can simultaneously provide quantitative baseline CBF
and the assessment of the CeV-R, but requires long acquisition time due to its intrinsic
low perfusion signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Compared to ASL imaging, T
2*
mapping with a respiratory challenge can also provide the estimates of the CeV-R,
but with higher resolution and shorter acquisition time. In this study, ASL
imaging and T
2* mapping were evaluated for the assessment of the CeV-R
in the hippocampus to facilitate the imaging method selection for future application
studies.
METHODS
Studies were performed with five healthy volunteers (age: 53 ± 18 years) on a Siemens 3T MRI scanner using a 32-channel head coil under an IRB approved
protocol with informed written consent. Precise and repeatable control of PetCO2
is crucial to avoid the confounding effects of ventilatory response and
minimize inter-subject and inter-session variability for CeV-R measurements 10. A prospective PetCO2 targeting approach was employed to produce PetCO2
values to within ±1 mmHg and constrained PetO2 (< 10 mmHg) 11.
PetCO2
and PetO2 were independently targeted via the administration of gases containing
mixtures of O2, CO2, and N2 to a sequential
gas-delivery breathing circuit by a computer-controlled gas blender (RespirAct, Thornhill Inc.) 12.
The targeted PetCO2 challenge was achieved by increasing
the level of PetCO2
10 mmHg above each
subject’s baseline while PetO2 was held
constant during
targeted PetCO2 challenge (Figure 1). The major
parameters for pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (PCASL)
imaging are: resolution = 3.0 x 3.0 x 5.0 mm3, labeling duration/post-bolus
delay = 1.5/1.6 s, and total number of measurements = 372. T2* mapping was performed
with one 3-minute hypercapnia acquisition preceded and followed by 3-minute
normocapnia acquisitions, and used a 3D multi-echo gradient recalled echo (GRE)
sequence with the following major parameters: resolution = 1.6 x 1.6 x 3.6 mm3,
and TE = {4, 10, 16, 22, 28, 34} ms. To avoid potential confounding effects from the
transition of respiratory conditions (Figure 3), T2* mapping was
performed 20 s after the change of respiratory condition and lasted about 2 and
a half minutes.
Similar
image processing methods, such as the segmentation of the hippocampus and its
co-registration to parametric maps, were applied to estimate hippocampal CBF
and T2* values 5,13. The CeV-R was evaluated as
the PetCO2-induced percent changes of hippocampal CBF and T2*
value. For hippocampal CBF estimation, three pairs of label and control images (about 20
s) following the change of respiratory condition were excluded. To minimize the effects of hyper-intensive T2* values
from the nearby CSF and susceptibility-associated signal loss, trimmed mean
values within hippocampal ROI were used for the estimation of hippocampal T2*
by excluding the 5% of voxels with the lowest values and 5% voxels with highest
values.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Both PCASL imaging and T
2*
mapping exhibit a significant cerebrovascular
response to the targeted PetCO
2, and the response by PCASL
imaging is significantly higher than
that by T
2* mapping (Figures 2-4). The percent changes
of hippocampal CBFs tend to correlate with the percent changes of hippocampal T
2*
values (Figure 5). Compared to PCASL
imaging, T
2* mapping suffers from severe susceptibility effects in
the middle-inferior brain regions (Figure 1) and the hyper-intensive T
2*
signals from the CSF, affecting the reliability of hippocampal T
2*
estimation and resulting in larger inter-subject variability than PCASL
imaging: 21% coefficient of variation for T
2* mapping and 16%
coefficient variation for PCASL imaging. Decreasing the applied longest TE for
T
2* mapping can reduce susceptibility effects, but may affect the accuracy
of T
2* estimation. To reduce the partial volume effects on
hippocampal CBF estimation, PCASL imaging should be applied with higher
imaging resolution for future studies, which can be
facilitated by employing an advanced imaging method, such as multi-band EPI
PCASL imaging
14.
CONCLUSION
The CeV-R in
the hippocampus has been successfully assessed by
using both T
2* mapping and PCASL imaging. Although compared
to T
2* mapping, PCASL imaging appears to
be a more attractive approach, higher
imaging resolution is needed to reduce the
partial volume effects on hippocampal CBF estimation.
Acknowledgements
P41 EB015894, P30 NS076408, Human Connectome
Project (1U54 MH091657) and UL1TR000114.
This research work is also
supported by the University of Minnesota Foundation. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and
does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of
Health.References
1. Cantin
S, Villien M, Moreaud O, et al. Impaired cerebral vasoreactivity to CO2 in
Alzheimer's disease using BOLD fMRI. NeuroImage. 2011;58(2):579-587.
2. Gao YZ, Zhang
JJ, Liu H, Wu GY, Xiong L, Shu M. Regional cerebral blood flow and
cerebrovascular reactivity in Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia
assessed by arterial spinlabeling magnetic resonance imaging. Current
neurovascular research. 2013;10(1):49-533.
Kantarci K, Petersen RC,
Przybelski SA, et al. Hippocampal volumes, proton magnetic resonance
spectroscopy metabolites, and cerebrovascular disease in mild cognitive
impairment subtypes. Arch Neurol. 2008;65(12):1621-1628.
4. Rodriguez G, Vitali P, Calvini P, et al. Hippocampal
perfusion in mild Alzheimer's disease. Psychiatry
Res. 2000;100(2):65-74.
5.
Li X, Spence JS, Buhner DM, et al.
Hippocampal dysfunction in Gulf War veterans: investigation with ASL perfusion
MR imaging and physostigmine challenge. Radiology.
2011;261(1):218-225.
6.
Endemann DH, Schiffrin EL.
Endothelial dysfunction. Journal of the
American Society of Nephrology : JASN. 2004;15(8):1983-1992.
7.
Vesely A, Sasano H, Volgyesi G, et
al. MRI mapping of cerebrovascular reactivity using square wave changes in
end-tidal PCO2. Magnetic resonance in
medicine : official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine /
Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2001;45(6):1011-1013.
8.
Tancredi FB, Gauthier CJ, Madjar
C, et al. Comparison of pulsed and pseudocontinuous arterial spin-labeling for
measuring CO2 -induced cerebrovascular reactivity. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI. 2012;36(2):312-321.
9.
Rossi C, Boss A, Donati OF, et
al. Manipulation of cortical gray matter oxygenation by hyperoxic respiratory
challenge: field dependence of R(2) * and MR signal response. NMR in biomedicine. 2012;25(8):1007-1014.
10.
Mark CI, Slessarev M, Ito S, Han
J, Fisher JA, Pike GB. Precise control of end-tidal carbon dioxide and oxygen
improves BOLD and ASL cerebrovascular reactivity measures. Magnetic resonance in medicine : official journal of the Society of
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine / Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2010;64(3):749-756.
11.
Slessarev M, Han J, Mardimae A, et
al. Prospective targeting and control of end-tidal CO2 and O2 concentrations. The Journal of physiology. 2007;581(Pt
3):1207-1219.
12.
Prisman E, Slessarev M, Han J, et
al. Comparison of the effects of independently-controlled end-tidal PCO(2) and
PO(2) on blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) MRI. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI. 2008;27(1):185-191.
13. Li X, Sarkar SN, Purdy DE,
Spence JS, Haley RW, Briggs RW. Anteroposterior perfusion heterogeneity in
human hippocampus measured by arterial spin labeling MRI. NMR in biomedicine. 2013;26(6):613-621.
14.
Li X, Wang D, Auerbach EJ,
Moeller S, Ugurbil K, Metzger GJ. Theoretical and experimental evaluation of
multi-band EPI for high-resolution whole brain pCASL Imaging. NeuroImage. 2015;106:170-181.