Catarina Rua1,2, Mauro Costagli2,3, Mark R Symms4, Laura Biagi3, Mirco Cosottini2,5, Alberto Del Guerra1, and Michela Tosetti2,3
1Department of Physics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, 2Imago7 Research Center, Pisa, Italy, 3IRCCS Stella Maris, Pisa, Italy, 4GE Healthcare, Pisa, Italy, 5Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
Synopsis
This study compared GRE-EPI and SE-EPI
sequences with different spatial resolutions at 7T for fMRI in the visual
cortex. It is demonstrated that SE-EPI yields higher specificity than GRE-EPI.
However, the decreasing temporal signal-to-noise at submillimeter acquisitions
affected significantly the extension of the activated volume in a SE
acquisition. At this level, GRE-based functional maps showed significant
increased specificity compared to standard resolutions, and a preserved cluster
volume. The reduction of partial volume effects allowed the selection of an
activation sub-cluster excluding the highest z-scores, which co-localized
preferably in non-gray matter, potentially increasing the performance of UHF
high-resolution fMRI.Introduction
High field MRI allows the acquisition of ultra-high
resolution functional images of the human brain using the blood oxygenation
level dependent (BOLD) contrast
1. Debate exists whether studies
should still rely on the higher sensitivity to signal changes of Gradient Echo
(GRE) acquisitions or instead use T2-weighted Spin Echo (SE) sequences which,
with higher intrinsic SNR given by the larger B
0, could potentially
show greater advantages in correctly identifying the site of activation
2-7.
Purpose
Given
that the characteristics of the BOLD signal and noise vary non-linearly with
resolution
8,9, in this study a quantitative evaluation of the
sequences is made, comparing acquisitions at sub-millimeter to conventional
resolutions at 7T. Signal dynamics, extent, and spatial distribution of the
functional statistical maps are measured in the early visual cortex.
Methods
Four
healthy volunteers were scanned on a 7T MRI scanner (GE Healthcare, USA) with
optimized GRE and SE-EPI sequences for targeted fMRI. Ten slices were
prescribed obliquely, parallel to the calcarine sulcus and covering most of the
visual cortex, including V1 and V5. All fMRI scans used a 2-shot EPI approach
with effective TR=3s (shot-TR=1.5s), rBW=250kHz, Fat Suppression, ASSET factor=2,
phase encoding=Anterior-to-Posterior, slice thickness=1.4mm, slice spacing=0.1mm.
In
SE-EPI, TE was set to 45ms and in GRE-EPI it was set to 23ms, with FA=62º.
SE and GRE scans were acquired at
three different in-plane resolutions: 1.5x1.5mm2,
1.0x1.0xmm2 and 0.75x0.75mm2. The functional task
consisted of a dynamic display of coherent motion (15s blocks of dots moving
coherently, followed by 15s blocks of gray screen) with total duration of 3'00''
per scan. 12 of dummy scans were added at the start to achieve steady state.
At each resolution, single-volume GRE and SE-EPIs with whole brain coverage
were acquired with identical parameters as the functional scans but with
effective TR=8s to allow an almost complete coverage of the brain (~50 slices).
A standard T1-weighted sequence was also acquired for anatomical
co-registration of V1 and V5 masks from MNI space. Automated segmentation of
gray matter (GM) was achieved with FAST (FSL v5.0.5, http://www.fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/)
applied to the long-TR GRE-EPI scans; tissue not included in the GM mask was
labeled as "non-GM".
Functional
data were motion-corrected in AFNI and high-pass temporal filtered with Hcut-off=60s
and pre-whitened using FEAT. A general linear model analysis was used to
extract statistically significant signal changes elicited by the visual
stimulus. The output z-score maps were cluster thresholded at z>2.3. These
maps, designated "z-full",were further upper-thresholded at different
percentages (10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90%) to create 5 additional z-maps: voxels
above the z-score percent threshold were set to zero.
Average
values of temporal SNR, percent signal change (ΔS/S) and cluster volume were
extracted from the z-statistical maps in GM of V1 and V5. Specificity of the
activation was defined as: Spec=TN/(TN+FP), where TN (true negatives) = number
of non-active voxels in non-GM and FP (false positives) = number of active voxels
in non-GM10.
Results
At
all resolutions tSNR in GRE was higher (47±13)% than in SE, and this
difference was statistically significant (χ
2=9.72; p-value=0.0015), while
the percent signal change was similar in SE and GRE (χ
2=1.33;
p-value=0.25). For GRE, in V1 we observed lower ΔS/S in lower z-score voxels
(purple/blue curves in Figure 1) but this effect diminished in V5. As expected
the cluster size was bigger in GRE than in SE. However, only in the latter we
observed a significant decrease in activation volume when acquiring at small
voxel sizes (Figure 2). Also, the contribution of lower-z voxels to the active
volume in GRE was higher in V5 than in V1. Specificity was consistently higher
in SE; however, specificity in GRE increased significantly with increasing
resolution, and increased in the lower z-scored voxels (Figure 3).
Discussion
At
7T, SE BOLD signal at standard spatial resolutions reflected meaningful
activations and had high spatial specificity to active microvasculature. Nonetheless,
the decreasing temporal signal-to-noise ratio at high spatial resolutions reduced
the extent of the detected activation. This occurred to a lesser degree in GRE
where, at submillimeter acquisitions, the reduced partial volume effects, the increased specificity and ΔS/S allowed the differentiation between very high
percent signal changes that corresponded mostly to non-grey matter regions
(vasculature), and smaller yet statistically significant activations located predominantly
in the gray-matter.
Conclusion
We
conclude that properly masked GRE-based functional maps should be preferred for
fMRI applications at high field using high spatial resolutions.
Acknowledgements
This
work was supported by the Initial Training Network, HiMR,
funded by the FP7 Marie Curie Actions of the European Commission
(FP7-PEOPLE-2012-ITN-316716).References
1. Van der Zwaag W, Francis S, Head K, et al. fMRI at 1.5, 3 and 7
T: Characterizing BOLD signal changes. NeuroImage. 2005;47:1425-1434.
2. Norris D G. Spin-echo fMRI: the poor relation? NeuroImage. 2012;62:1109–1115.
3. Pflugfelder D, Vahedipour K, Uludag K, et al. On the numerically
predicted spatial BOLD fMRI specificity for spin echo sequences. Magn. Reson.
Imaging. 2011;29:1195-1204.
4. Budde J,
Shajan G, Zaitsev M, et al. Functional MRI in human subjects with gradient-echo
and spin-echo EPI at 9.4 T. Magn. Reson. Med. 2014;71:209–218.
5. Boyacioglu
R, Schulz J, Mueller N, et al. Whole brain, high resolution multiband spin-echo
EPI fMRI at 7 T: a comparison with gradient-echo EPI using a color-word stroop
task. NeuroImage 2004;97:142–150.
6. Sanchez-Panchuelo
R, Schluppeck D, Harmer J, et al. Assessing the spatial precision of SE and
GE-BOLD contrast at 7 Tesla. Brain Topogr. 2015;28:62-65.
7. Chiacchiaretta
P, Romani G L, Ferretti A. Sensitivity of BOLD response to increasing visual
contrast: Spin echo and gradient Echo EPI. NeuroImage. 2013;82:35-43.
8. Triantafyllou
C, Polimeni J R, Elschot M, Wald L L. Physiological noise in gradient echo and
spin echo EPI at 3 T and 7 T. Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 2009;122.
9. Yacoub E,
Van De Moortele P F, Shmuel A, Ugurbil K. Signal and noise characteristics of
Hahn SE and GE BOLD fMRI at 7 T in humans. NeuroImage. 2005;24:738–750.
10. Klauschen F, Goldman A, Barra V, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Lundervold
A. Evaluation of automated brain MR image segmentation and volumetry methods.
Hum. Brain Mapp. 2009;30:1310-1327.