Hyungseok Jang1,2, Hyung-Jun Im1, Arman Rahmim3, Steve Y Cho1, and Alan B McMillan1
1Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States, 2Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States, 3Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
Synopsis
In this study we investigate the feasibility of
FDG PET/MR as a platform for whole body dynamic quantitative PET imaging. The
ability of PET/MR systems to provide truly simultaneous imaging is advantageous
compared to PET/CT for serial whole body PET acquisitions in that
simultaneously acquired MR images can provide additional information to PET
data, such as the application of motion parameters estimated from MR images to
PET images to correct for misregistration which is not possible with PET/CT.
Further improvements in workflow can allow integration of multiple MR
contrasts, making dynamic whole body PET/MR a highly feasible and compelling
methodology. Purpose
Dynamic 4D PET
acquisitions that utilize kinetic modeling can improve the diagnostic accuracy
of
18F-Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG) PET compared to conventional
static acquisitions
1,2. However, these acquisitions have typically
been limited to a single body region. New methodology has recently been
proposed for quantitative whole-body PET/CT
3,4 utilizing short
(e.g., 45 seconds/bed) PET scans to obtain whole body (WB) PET images within
5-6 minutes, allowing for serial multi-pass PET imaging. The purpose of this
project is to evaluate the feasibility of dynamic WB (DWB) FDG PET/MR, which
may have following advantages:
(1)
MR images can be obtained at every pass to provide additional soft tissue
contrast (which is not feasible for CT due to radiation dose concerns),
(2) Currently available integrated
PET/MR scanners have larger cranial-caudal or z-axis coverage per PET bed
position (approximately 25cm for both vendors) compared to most previous and current
generation PET and PET/CT scanners (typically 15-20cm) which will enable more
rapid WB coverage for better dynamic imaging, and
(3) MR images can be used to enable motion correction between WB scans,
which will improve PET and CT misregistration problems which exist with PET/CT
(initial CT followed by multi-pass WB PET), and therefore the robustness and
quantitative accuracy of WB dynamic PET imaging for FDG, and other PET tracers,
for improved diagnosis and lesion characterization.
Methods
All imaging was
performed on an integrated 3T PET/MR system (GE Signa PET/MR). To evaluate the
feasibility of WB motion correction for MRI, imaging was performed on a healthy
volunteer instructed to move between subsequent WB scans. Motion correction was
performed using automated B-spline image registration with normalized cross
correlation as a cost function
5,6.To evaluate the feasibility of DWB
PET/MR, a patient volunteer undergoing a clinical PET exam was imaged (under
institutional IRB approval) from approximately 30-55 minutes after FDG
administration. The acquisition scheme for DWB PET/MR is shown in Figure 1. DWB
PET/MR consisted of five stations/WB pass and a total of 5 WB passes (scan time
of 40 seconds/station, PET reconstruction parameters: VPFX (time of flight), 16
iterations, 2 subsets, SharpIR, Filter 5mm. MRI acquisition: LAVA Flex
(MR-based attenuation correction scan using body coil), TE1/TE2=1.1/2.2ms,
TR=4.0ms, FOV=50x50cm, pixel size=1.95x1.95mm, slice thickness
(interpolated)=2.6mm. The time to complete each WB (head-through-thighs) scan and
begin another whole body pass was approximately 4.5 minutes.
WB PET kinetic modeling utilized Patlak analysis
7 fit to a canonical
plasma time activity curve
8 adapted to the patient, given samples from
the left ventricular blood pool.
Results and Discussion
Results of WB MR-based
image registration, shown in Figure 2, demonstrate vastly improved registration
for inter-WB scan motion. Example DWB PET/MR images are shown in Figure 3.
Results of the WB kinetic modeling are shown in Figure 4. These results
indicate that DWB FDG PET/MR is feasible and may offer benefits compared to
similar methods performed on PET/CT. The use of MRI for motion correction is a
particularly strong capability due to the true simultaneity of PET/MR compared
to PET/CT. Future work should evaluate the quantitative differences in kinetic
modeling as result of different mechanisms for photon attenuation correction
between PET/MR and PET/CT. Additionally, the MRI protocol could be expanded to
perform additional imaging sequences utilizing different MR image contrasts and
intramodal registration between subsequent WB scans.
Conclusion
DWB PET/MR is
feasible and offers great potential for motion control and improved quantitative
PET analysis.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge support from GE HealthcareReferences
1. Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss et al. (2012). Cancer Imaging.12:283-9. PMID:23033440
2. Houshmand et al. (2015). PET Clin. 10(1):45-58. PMID:25455879
3. Karakatsanis et al. (2013). Phys Med Biol. 58(20):7391-418. PMID:24080962
4. Karakatsanis et al. (2013). Phys Med Biol. 58(20):7419-45. PMID:24080994
5. Klein et al. (2010). IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 29(1):196-205. PMID:19923044
6. Baike et al. (2011). MICCAI 2011. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23629-7_63
7. Patlak et al. (1983). J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 3(1):1-7. PMID:6822610
8. Feng et al. (1993). Int J Biomed Comput.32(2):95-110. PMID:8449593