Christina R Haeuser1, Alfred Ross1, Markus von Kienlin1, and Basil Künnecke1
1Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
Synopsis
Drug
treatment of vision impairing diseases often involves intraocular drug
injection into the vitreous humour, a highly viscous gel-like matter. Drug transport
within the vitreous humour has remained rather elusive although transport processes are acknowledged to play a
pivotal role for treatment efficacy and adverse effects in the target tissue. Here,
we devised a potentially translational approach based on contrast-enhanced 1H-MRI
and 19F-MRS to quantitatively ascertain intravitreal drug distribution kinetics
at the macro-scale. We provided proof-of-concept for the small drug-like
molecule trifluoroethanol in isolated porcine eyes.Rationale
Pharmacological
treatment of vision impairing diseases often involves intraocular drug injection
because the eye is well shielded by the blood-retina barrier from systemic access for -certain drug classes
including therapeutic antibodies [1]. To reach the target tissue within the
eye, drugs need to be transported through the vitreous humour, a highly viscous
gel-like matter consisting mainly of collagen fibrils, hyaluronan and 99% water
[2]. It is generally accepted that transport
processes play a pivotal role in the pharmacokinetics of intraocular
treatments, yet they have remained difficult to assess in the intact eye [3, 4]. Here, we devised a potentially translational approach
that combines contrast-enhanced 1H-MRI and 19F-MRS to visualise and ascertain
intravitral drug distribution kinetics at the macro-scale. A proof-of-concept
study with a small molecule was carried out in isolated intact porcine eyes.
Methods
1H-MRI
and 19F-MRS were performed on a Bruker BioSpec 4,7T/40cm system equipped with a
1H bird-cage resonator (72 mm ID) and a concentric 19F Alderman-Grant resonator
(25 mm ID). T1-weighted 1H-MRI was carried out with a RARE sequence
(TE
eff/TR=13/694ms, 21 contiguous slices of 1mm thickness) whereas localised
19F-MRS was performed with PRESS (TE/TR=20/2500ms, 3x3x3 mm
3 volume, 64 averages).
Porcine eyes (n=6) were obtained from the local slaughterhouse and used within
6 hours post mortem. 50 uL of a solution of phosphate buffered saline (PBS), trifluoroethanol (TFE) and Gd-DTPA (2 mmol/L) (7:2:1 v/v)
was injected intravitreally into the eye using a syringe attached to a 30 gauge
hypodermic needle. The injection site was identified on an initial 1H-MR image
and was used to place a volume of interest for subsequent 19F-MRS. Imaging and
spectroscopy were performed alternatingly for at least one hour by acquiring a 1H-MRI
volume followed by five repetitions of 19F-MRS.
Results
In
this proof-of-concept study, TFE was taken as a surrogate for a small
“drug-like” molecule that carries fluorine as an intramolecular label to follow
drug distribution quantitatively. The underlying notion is that the macroscopic
distribution kinetics would lead to a decrease in the local drug concentration
at the injection site until concentration equilibrium is reached throughout the
vitreous humour. The small amount of Gd-DTPA in the injected volume allowed rapid
identification of the injection site by T1-weighted 1H-MRI and provided a first
pictorial view (Fig. 1) of distribution processes. Figure 2 depicts a time
series of spectra obtained by 19F-MRS in order to quantitatively assess the
distribution kinetics of TFE in vitreous humour. As forecast, the local drug
concentration decreased steadily over the first hour after intravitreal
injection (Fig. 3). Fick’s second law adapted to radial diffusion in a sphere
provides a convenient approximation to the time-concentration relationship of
the distribution kinetics observed in the eye:
$$\frac{\partial u}{\partial t} = D (\frac{\partial^{2} u}{\partial r^{2}})$$
with u = Cr (C: local concentration; r: radius, t: time; D: diffusion coefficient)
Discussion
Macroscopic
distribution kinetics in the vitreous humour even in the isolated eye turns out
to be complex as it is governed both by diffusion and convection. With 1H-MRI we
demonstrated that for the injected solution with a density of ~1.08 g/ml
gravitational forces contributed substantially to the distribution kinetics.
The data clearly showed that drug distribution in the vitreous humour and hence
drug delivery to the target tissue is a slow process on a time scale of hours.
Many drugs that are used to treat vitreoretinal
diseases have a narrow therapeutic range. Hence, detailed knowledge about local
drug concentration is essential to guide drug delivery strategies. Here, we
demonstrated that localised 19F-MRS can be successfully used to quantitatively
report intravitreal drug availability over time.
Conclusions
Fluorine
MRS shows great potential for directly monitoring distribution processes and
the local concentration of fluorine-tagged drugs in the 1H-signal dominated vitreous humour. Prerequisite is fluorine
tagging, yet many drug molecules genuinely contain fluorine. Since
predominantly large molecule drugs such as antibodies are administered
intreavitreally, direct monitoring is essential because their distribution
kinetics may differ substantially from proxy markers. The propitious detection
sensitivity demonstrated here suggests that fluorine labelling of lysine side
chains enables such 19F-MRS based monitoring of antibody distribution.
Acknowledgements
We thank T. Bielser for building the 19F resonator.References
1. Duvvuri, S., Majumdar S., Mitra A.K. Drug
delivery to the retina: challenges and opportunities, Expert Opinion on
Biological Therapy 2003; 3:45-56.
2. Bishop, P., The biochemical
structure of mammalian vitreous. Eye 1996; 10:664-670.
3. Missel, P., Hydraulic flow and vascular
clearance influences on intravitreal drug delivery. Pharm Res 2002; 19 :1636-1647.
4. Friedrich,
S.; Cheng, Y. L.; Saville, B., Drug distribution in the vitreous humor of the
human eye: the effects of intravitreal injection position and volume. Curr Eye
Res 1997; 16:663-669.