Cellulose-triacetate Nanoparticles as Smart Contrast Agents for Single Cell Detection.
Laura Szkolar-Sienkiewicz1, Christiane Mallett2, and Erik M Shapiro1

1Radiology, Michigan State University, East lansing, MI, United States, 2Michigan State University, East lansing, MI, United States

Synopsis

It was demonstrated that enzymatically degradable cellulose triacetate particles offer a novel approach to contrast modulation. The use of such materials as smart contrast agents has been discussed and evidence of cellular uptake and relaxivity modification shown.

Introduction

The potential tissue repair properties of stem cells have prompted their investigation for use in multiple clinical applications. The most recognisable is the use of stem cell transplants for regenerative medicine. For such clinical applications, not only is it important to identify the position of transplanted cells within tissue but it is also vital to monitor the state of the cell. In particular for stem cell transplants, identifying whether delivered stem cells have differentiated into the desired mature cells would be desirable. This technology is missing.Non-invasive imaging techniques are already playing a critical role in the development of clinical applications of cell transplants. Herein a method of single cell detection is proposed, where contrast evolves via the enzymatically triggered release of magnetic nanocrystals from cellulose triacetate encapsulated iron oxide nanoparticles.

Methods

Encapsulation of Fe3O4 within cellulose-triacetate.
Fe3O4 nanocrystals were synthesized using the thermal decomposition of iron oleate1. Nanocrystals were encapsulated at 25% w/v within cellulose triacetate (Sigma-Aldrich,USA) by means of emulsification2 or nanoprecipitation3. In brief 10mgmL-1 25% w/v cellulose triacetate was dissolved in DCM and added 1:4 dropwise into 1% PVA solution, tip sonicated and added to dH2O. Nanoprecipitation encapsulation was achieved by dissolution of 10mgmL-1 cellulose triacetate in acetone and precipitated into 1:4 dH2O.

Measurement of particle enzymatic degradation.
Nanoparticle formation and diameter was measured by SEM using an AURIGA® CrossBeam Dual Column SEM-FIB Workstation (Carl Zeiss,Germany). Images were taken before and after cellulase incubation. Cellulase activity was determined by conversion of cellulose into glucose using a cellulase assay (Worthington-Biochemical,USA). 0.1mgmL-1 of nanoparticles were incubated with 1% v/v cellulase at 37oC. Released glucose was determined in a hexokinase/glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase system and measured at 340 nm.

Measurement of relaxivity, r2*.
Nanoparticles were incubated for 24 hours, 37OC with or without 0.1mgmL-1 cellulase (Worthington-Biochemical,USA) then suspended in 1% (w/v) agarose at 0.5 and 0.1 mgmL-1 of iron. T2* measurements were made using a 7T Bruker BioSpec 70/30 USR with Paravision 6.0, using a large volume transmit/receive coil to acquire multi-gradient echo sequence at resolution of 400x400 um with slice thickness 1 mm. T2* was measured 3 times in each tube then r2* relaxivity was calculated for each particle type.

Cellular uptake.
NP uptake was investigated using coumarin 6 loaded NP's. In brief, mMSC's were incubated for 3 hours with 0.1mgmL-1 cellulose triacetate NP's. Fixed, permeabilized cells were subsequently visualized using phalloidin (cytoskeleton) and DAPI (nuclei) staining. Images were taken on


Data analysis and statistics.
A one-way ANOVA was undertake to assess the statistical significance of differences between mean values of cellulase activity and again between r2* values before and after cellulase addition. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

SEM images showed the successful fabrication of 300-400nm nanoparticles (Figure 1a), which underwent degradation in the presence of 0.1mgmL-1 cellulase (Figure 1b). The amount of cellulase activity (units/mg) was measured over 24 hour (Figure 1c) which convincingly showed that cellulase degraded cellulose triacetate nanoparticles. Statistical analysis also showed that the activity of cellulase was similar upon cellulose triacetate NP’s and cellulose NP’s.After particle incubation with cellulase, a significant increase in relaxivity was seen (figure 2). Those NP’s fabricated by nanoprecipitation (figure 2b) demonstrated a 3 fold increase in r2*, successfully indicating that enzymatically degrading the cellulose biopolymer coat results in a change in contrast (Figure 2c). Incubation of cellulose triacetate NP's with mMSC's showed evidence of cellular uptake (figure 3).

Discussion

Cellulose triacetate nanoparticles can undergo triggered enzymatic degradation by cellulase, in a similar way to cellulose only nanoparticles. Successful removal of the cellulose triacetate by enzymatic degradation results in the modulation of relaxivity, r2* and evolution of contrast as encapsulated Fe3O4 is released.These nanoparticles were demonstrated as capable for endocytosis by mMSC's making them suitable for cell labelling.

Conclusion

Cellulase degradable cellulose triacetate NP’s offer promise as an in-situ cellular imaging agent. The small NP diameter makes such particles ideal for cellular endocytosis. The long term vision of this work is to create transgenic stem cells which express catabolic enzymes under the control of a promoter activated during stem cell differentiation. Following expression, these enzymes will be shuttled to the endosome/lysosome. Co-localization of the enzyme and nanoparticles within the endosome/lysosome during differentiation will then allow for the evolution of contrast.

Acknowledgements

Financial support from NIH R01 EB017881 is greatly appreciated

References

1. Park J, Hyeon T et al. Synthesis of monodisperse spherical nanocrystals. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2007;(46);4630-4660.

2. Granot D, Shapiro E M. Release activation of iron oxide nanoparticles: (REACTION) A novel environmentally sensitive MRI paradigm. Magnetic Resonance in medicine. 2011; 65(5):1253-9.

3. Hornig S, Schubert U et al. Synthetic polymeric nanoparticles by nanoprecipitation. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2009; 19(23):3838-3840.

Figures

Figure 1. The enzymatic degradation of cellulose triacetate nanoparticles with 0.1mgmL-1 cellulase. Scanning electron micrograph showing nanoparticles a) before and b) after 3hrs incubation and c) Cellulase activity upon cellulose and cellulose triacetate nanoparticles over 24 hours. n=6, error bar ±SD.

Figure 2. The relaxivity (r2*) versus concentration for Cellulose triacetate encapsulated Fe3O4 nanoparticles produced via a) Emulsification and b) nanoprecipitation. n=3, error bar ±SD and c) an example T2* map.

Figure 3. Fluorescent microscopy images of mMSC's after 3 hours encapsulation with coumarin6 loaded cellulose triacetate NP's. Where the cytoskeleton (red), nuclei (blue) and NP' (green) are visualised.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
3696