Synopsis
This study tried to simultaneously trace blood perfusion and
glymphatic passage by applying two-compartment parallel model (2CPM) on D2O
perfusion using the new imaging strategy. Six rats were injected with D2O,
and both F1 and F2 were quantified from 2CPM. The results
show that F1 is highly coordinated with cerebral blood flow, while F2
is much irrelevant. Only regions near several arteries show significant F2
values, which is speculated as the paravascular pathway of CSF regulated by
glymphatic system. Therefore, using 2CPM for tracing D2O might
noninvasively reveal the information of both blood and CSF dynamics.Introduction
Glymphatic system has been demonstrated as a lymphatic-like
circulating system in brain tissue and was predicted existing in paravascular
pathway. A recent study has confirmed this hypothesis by injecting fluorescent
tracers into the cisterna magna and thus located their distribution in murine
1. As a freely diffusible tracer, deuterium oxide (D
2O) may be an
alternative in discovering glymphatic system through non-invasive tail-vein
injection method. In addition to the quantification of hemodynamics
2, D
2O
may also trace the water passage in glymphatic system because of its
water-close characteristic. Wang et al. have used D
2O as a negative
contrast agent by
1H-MRI imaging and showed improved signal-to-noise
ratio comparing to direct measurement of D
2O
3. Therefore, we used
this new strategy to acquire DÂ
2O perfusion images in this study, and
extracted both blood and glymphatic dynamics simultaneously by applying two-compartment
parallel model (2CPM). The traditional one-compartment Tofts model (1CTM) was also
applied to quantify cerebral blood flow (CBF) for comparison
4.
Materials and Methods
Six adult male Spaugue-Dawley rats were
anesthetized by 1.5 % isoflurane and injected with D2O (2ml/100g)
via tail vein at 7T Bruker Clinscan MRI scanner. 80 measurements were acquired
by the following parameters: turbo-spin-echo (TSE) with TR/TE = 2000/14ms,
matrix size = 128x256, FOV = 35mm, turbo factor = 3, slice number = 3, slice
thickness = 1.5mm, distant factor = 40%, sampling interval = 34s. Then, the
relative concentration-time curves were estimated by calculating signal change
from the pre-injection baseline level. The arterial input function (AIF) was
extracted by averaging three to six selected voxels in the area of cerebral
artery and reconstructed by a0*t for wash-in phase and a1*exp(-b*t)+c
for wash-out. The two pharmacokinetic models, 1CTM and 2CPM, were utilized as
the following equation (1) and (2), respectively.
(1) $$$C_{t}(t)=AIF(t)\otimes[F_{0}\exp(-F_{0}t/v_{0})]$$$
(2) $$$C_{t}(t)=AIF(t)\otimes[F_{1}\exp(-F_{1}t/v_{1})+F_{2}\exp(-F_{2}t/v_{2})]$$$
where Ct: concentration-time curve, Fi:
flow, vi: distributed volume, where i=0,1,2. Parameter constraint: v0<1,
F1≥F2, v1+v2=1. Then we quantified
Fi as flow with a unit of ml/min/100g.
Results
Figure 1 shows the spatial maps of F
0 quantified
from 1CTM (1a) and F
1 from 2CPM (1b) of six rats (R1-6),
respectively. These two maps both show nice contrast of brain tissues and appear
to be very similar to each other. The F
2 maps from 2CPM are
presented in Figure 2. Only regions at some specific structures show significant
flow values. In Figure 3, the F
2 values of Rat 5 higher than an
empirical threshold (in this case, F
2 > 3 ml/min/100g) are
included in the regions of interest (ROIs), and superimposed on the anatomical
images. These locations of ROIs are near several arteries, including (I) middle
cerebral artery, (II) azygos pericallosal artery, (III) supracollicular
arterial network, and (IV) posterior communicating artery. Some regions surrounding
on the cortical surface of brain might be surface and penetrating arteries. Figure 4 demonstrates the
averaged concentration-time curves of whole brain and ROIs in Rat 5 with a
curve of the corresponding AIF for reference. Comparing to the whole-brain
concentration-time curve, the ROIs curve shows a higher magnitude at
first-bolus arrival and slower clearance rate at the end of dynamic scans. Figure 5 summarizes flow values of all rats and their coefficients of determination,
where R
12 is F
0 versus F
1 and R
22
is F
0 versus F
2, respectively.
Discussion and Conclusion
This study demonstrated that the multi-compartment analyses
on D
2O perfusion by using the new imaging strategy could be useful
to quantify the water dynamics with adequate spatial and temporal information.
F
1 was highly coordinated with F
0 despite of an
insignificant augment, thus F
1 could be speculated as the CBF. On
the other hand, the F
2 value of a parallel flow was much irrelevant
with the blood flow, and the spatial distributions of the parallel flow were adjacent
to the location of cerebral arteries, which matched with the recent report of the
paravascular pathway of cerebral-spinal fluid (CSF)
1. Therefore, according
to the blood irrelevant flow values and the spatial matched mapping, we have
demonstrated that using 2CPM for tracing D
2O might noninvasively
reveal the information of CSF-dynamics which is regulated by glymphatic system.
Further investigations and applications should be conducted to connect D
2O
tracer analysis of 2CPM with the comprehensive water passage in rat brain.
Acknowledgements
The
Ministry of Science and Technology provided the grant support of this work.
(MOST 103-2221-E-007-008-, 104-2221-E-007-063-)References
1. lliff JJ, Wang M, Liao Y, Plogg BA, Peng W, Gundersen GA, Benveniste H, Vates GE, Deane R, Goldman SA, Nagelhus EA, Nedergaard M. A paravascular pathway facilitates CSF flow through the brain parenchyma and the clearance of interstitial solutes, including amyloid β. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(147):147ra111
2. Kim SG, Ackerman JJ. Multicompartment analysis of blood flow and tissue perfusion employing D2O as a freely diffusible tracer: a novel deuterium NMR technique demonstrated via application with murine RIF-1 tumors. Magn Reson Med. 1988;8(4):410-426
3. Wang FN, Peng SL, Lu CT, Peng HH, Yeh TC. Water signal attenuation by D2O infusion as a novel contrast mechanism for 1H perfusion MRI. NMR Biomed. 2013;26(6):692-698
4. Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, Evelhoch JL, Henderson E, Knopp MV, Larsson HB, Lee TY, Mayr NA, Parker GJ, Port RE, Taylor J, Weisskoff RM. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10(3):223-232