Synopsis
A system and
workflow for spatially registered in vivo
optical microscopy, MRI, and PET of breast tumor metabolism is described. The
system is coupled with a bioreactor designed to compare cellular metabolism in vitro using both optical microscopy
and MR spectroscopy with the behavior of tumor cells in the in vivo tumor microenvironment. Results
from enzyme reactions are shown, demonstrating the temperature control
capabilities of the bioreactor. A proof of concept in vivo experiment is also described, with optical microscopy data
of a mammary tumor acquired in conjunction with MRI and PET data, on the same
animal.Purpose
Understanding tumor metabolism may aid in proper
diagnosis and assessment of treatment response
1. The gold standard
of positron emission tomography (PET) using
18F labeled
2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG) utilizes the difference in glucose uptake of
tumors and normal tissue to enhance the contrast of tumors
2.
However, new techniques have emerged that yield complementary metabolic
information. Optical fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM), probes the chemical
states of metabolites like nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) by
comparing the relative lifetimes of their fluorescence in cells
3,4.
In addition, magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) of hyperpolarized
13C
nuclei provides atomic information about pyruvate metabolism and lactate
production
5. Combining these techniques in a multi-modal platform
would unite three imaging scales (Figure 1) and provide a more complete picture
of tumor metabolism. Here, we present our work to develop multi-modal and
multi-scale imaging platforms that are both
in
vitro, in a bioreactor, and
in vivo,
in a mouse model. Breast cancer has been well classified with the above
techniques and was thus chosen as the cancer model.
Methods
The bioreactor design (Figure 2) for in vitro FLIM and MRS included precise
temperature control, cell culture environmental control (media infusion, oxygen
environment, etc.) and an optical imaging window. Temperature was controlled
with flowing warm water through a channel that runs around the cell culture and
an MR-compatible temperature probe fed into the cell culture volume (Figure 3A-B,4A-B).
The optical window of the bioreactor was held in place with glass-filled nylon
screws and sealed with two silicon gaskets (Figure 3D). The shape of the
bioreactor allows for a 13C surface MR coil (Doty
Scientific, Inc.) to conveniently fit around the sample volume for improved
signal sensitivity.
Several in vitro experiments were performed to test the bioreactor. First,
enzyme reactions tested the spectroscopic measurements consisting of approximately
20-U of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH, 5µL by volume of L-LDH from bovine heart,
Sigma) and varying amounts, 12, 24 and 36µmol of NADH (Figure 4C-D) in 1mL Tris
Buffer. 32µmol of [1-13C] pyruvic acid was polarized to ~20% and injected
through ports on top of the bioreactor. Dynamic 13C spectra were
acquired (global RF excitation, 5° FA, 10kHz BW) with a 3s temporal resolution.
13C-enriched pyruvic acid was hyperpolarized (HP) using a HyperSense
DNP Polariser (Oxford Instruments). To demonstrate the viability of the optical
window, an image of GFP-expressing MDA-231 human breast cancer cells6
was taken through the window (Figure 3C).
The mouse model used for in vivo experiments was the polyoma
virus middle T oncoprotein (PyVT) breast cancer model7. In vivo optical imaging was performed through
a subcutaneously implanted optical window over a growing mammary tumor (Figure
5A). The window consists of a small custom plastic frame, fabricated using a 3D
printer, and a small cover glass. Materials used were MR compatible. All animal
experiments complied with institutional IACUC regulations with the [PyVT] mouse
anesthetized with 1.5% isoflurane. A 4.7T small animal MR system (Agilent
Technologies) and an Inveon Hybrid microPET/CT (Siemens) were used for MR and
PET acquisitions, respectively.
Results
For the
in vitro enzyme reactions, the time-averaged spectra showed an
increase in lactate signal as a function of NADH (Figure 4D), as expected. Once
temperature control (37
oC) was incorporated, optimal
enzyme kinetics allowed for an enhanced
13C lactate signal (Figure 4D). A proof
of concept
in vivo multi-modal and multi-scale
experiment was performed. Optical microscopy data related to extra-cellular
matrix (second harmonic generation (SHG)) and metabolism (intrinsic
fluorescence from flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) and NADH) were acquired in
a mammary tumor through an implanted optical window (Figure 5C) and an
18F-FDG-PET
scan with anatomy provided by T
1-weighted gradient echo and T
2-weighted
fast spin echo MR scans (Figure 5B) were acquired in the same mouse for a total
image session of 3hr.
Dicussion
Ongoing work will focus on two aims:
adding media flow to the bioreactor to enable its use for cell culture studies
and adding metabolic imaging techniques, HP
13C MRS and FLIM, to our
in vivo studies. The completion of
this work will yield two novel platforms capable of providing new insights into
how tumor metabolism behaves at different imaging scales within both cell
culture and the tumor microenvironment.
Conclusion
Feasibility
is demonstrated for a system, including workflow, for spatially registered
optical microscopy, MRI, and PET of breast tumor metabolism
in vivo. The system is coupled with a
bioreactor designed to compare cellular metabolism
in vitro using both optical microscopy and MR spectroscopy with the
macroscopic behavior of tumor cells in the
in
vivo tumor microenvironment.
Acknowledgements
The authors
would like to thank the Morgridge Institute for Research for their continued
funding of this project. Funding was
also provided by the Laboratory for Optical and Computational Instrumentation
(LOCI) at the University of Wisconsin. This project was also supported in part by grant UL1TR000427
to UW ICTR from NIH/NCATS. Lastly, the authors would like to thank the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center Cancer Center
Support Grant P30 CA014520.References
1. L. M. Phan, S.-C. J. Yeung, and
M.-H. Lee, “Cancer metabolic reprogramming: importance, main features, and
potentials for precise targeted anti-cancer therapies,” Cancer Biol. Med.,
vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–19, Mar. 2014.
2. P. Som, H. L. Atkins, D. Bandoypadhyay,
J. S. Fowler, R. R. MacGregor, K. Matsui, Z. H. Oster, D. F. Sacker, C. Y.
Shiue, H. Turner, C. N. Wan, A. P. Wolf, and S. V. Zabinski, “A fluorinated
glucose analog, 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (F-18): nontoxic tracer for rapid
tumor detection,” J. Nucl. Med. Off. Publ. Soc. Nucl. Med., vol. 21, no.
7, pp. 670–675, Jul. 1980.
3. C.-W. Chang, D. Sud, and M.-A.
Mycek, “Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy,” Methods Cell Biol.,
vol. 81, pp. 495–524, 2007.
4. D. S. Elson, I. Munro, J.
Requejo-Isidro, J. McGinty, C. Dunsby, N. Galletly, G. W. Stamp, M. a. A. Neil,
M. J. Lever, P. A. Kellett, A. Dymoke-Bradshaw, J. Hares, and P. M. W. French,
“Real-time time-domain fluorescence lifetime imaging including single-shot
acquisition with a segmented optical image intensifier,” New J. Phys.,
vol. 6, no. 1, p. 180, Nov. 2004.
5. F. A. Gallagher, S. E. Bohndiek, M.
I. Kettunen, D. Y. Lewis, D. Soloviev, and K. M. Brindle, “Hyperpolarized 13C
MRI and PET: in vivo tumor biochemistry,” J. Nucl. Med. Off. Publ. Soc.
Nucl. Med., vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 1333–1336, Sep. 2011.
6. R. Cailleau, M. Olivé, and Q. V.
Cruciger, “Long-term human breast carcinoma cell lines of metastatic origin:
preliminary characterization,” In Vitro, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 911–915,
Nov. 1978.
7. E. Y. Lin, J. G. Jones, P. Li, L.
Zhu, K. D. Whitney, W. J. Muller, and J. W. Pollard, “Progression to malignancy
in the polyoma middle T oncoprotein mouse breast cancer model provides a
reliable model for human diseases,” Am. J. Pathol., vol. 163, no. 5, pp.
2113–2126, Nov. 2003.