Xinqiang Yan1,2, Lei Shi3, Baotong Feng2, Zhe Wang1, Shujun Wei2, Chuangxi Ma2, Long Wei2, and Rong Xue1
1State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Beijing MRI Center for Brain Research, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, People's Republic of, 2Key Laboratory of Nuclear Radiation and Nuclear Energy Technology, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, People's Republic of, 3State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China, People's Republic of
Synopsis
Specific absorption rate (SAR) is a limiting factor for
high field MRI due to excess
RF power deposition in human subjects. In this study, we developed a multi-channel
real-time RF power monitoring system for global and local SAR estimation using FPGA
to
ensure patient safety. The
major components of the monitoring
system include multiple dual directional couplers, demodulating logarithmic
power sensors, analog to digital converters and a FPGA fast signal processing
unit, etc. The deviation of the
power measurement was less than 0.5dB after calibration for system errors over
a dynamic RF signal range of 100dB.PURPOSE
Magnetic resonance image quality, e.g., SNR,
resolution and contrast, benefits greatly with the increased static magnetic
field strength B0 [1]. However, RF power deposition and specific
absorption rate (SAR) also increase near quadratically with B0 [2]. Therefore,
SAR becomes a limiting factor in high field MRI for
various applications. Multi-channel RF transmission also results in
electromagnetic field variations that may cause the local peak SAR to exceed the
IEC/FDA limits [3, 4]. Under these conditions, monitoring the RF power deposition and global and local peak SAR
values are of vital significance to patient safety. In this study, we developed a multi-channel real time RF power
monitoring system for SAR estimation using the FPGA technology in high field MRI.
METHODS
Eight
forward and reflected RF power monitoring pathways were built to detect the transmit
RF powers delivered to the MRI coil arrays. The overall block diagram is shown in
Fig. 1. The power monitoring pathways include: dual
directional couplers, power sensor modules, analog-to-digital converters (ADC) and the FPGA unit. In each transmission pathway, the forward and
reflected RF powers were measured by a non-magnetic dual directional coupler (Pulsar Microwave, NJ, USA ) followed with two AD8309 (Analog Devices, Norwood, MA) demodulating
logarithmic power sensors [5]. The directional coupler can couple the peak
RF power up to 2000w with the
coupling factor of 50 dB. The AD8309
further demodulated the RF power signal with a dynamic range
between -78dBm to 22dBm. The power monitoring pathway therefore can detect the peak input RF power varying from 0.0016mW up to
15kW. The DC signals from 16 power sensors were then digitized by two 12-bit,
8-channel AD7298 (Analog Devices, Norwood MA) ADCs, and the data stream were read by a Xilinx fast FPGA signal processing unit. FPGA processed the multi-channel digitized signals in a high speed,
time-sharing mode. The deposited RF power was then calibrated for system errors with
a loop-up table and continuously averaged for a short 10-second and a
long 6-minute period. The averaged RF power values
were then transferred to a PC computer for further global and local peak SAR estimation
with algorithms. The power absorption ratio to estimate the global and local
peak SAR values over 10 gram tissue in a human subject model was determined
from the EM simulation results, while the SAR threshold
values were decided according to the FDA and IEC criteria [4]. The PC computer would
send a TTL triggering signal to the MRI spectrometer when the average power of global
or local peak SAR exceeded the limits.
RESULTS
A multi-layer PCB board with the integration of
the16-channel AD8309 power sensors, two AD7298 high-speed ADC chips and the
FPGA unit was built and shown in Fig. 2. To test the function of the RF power
monitoring system, an Agilent N5181A RF signal generator was employed
to produce a 300MHz sinusoidal RF signal, which was then equally split into
8-channels and fed into the eight forward RF power monitoring pathways. The
measurement for each channel was calibrated individually at the operational
frequency (300MHz) in comparison with an Agilent 8990B peak power analyzer. The
maximal error of the measurements was less than 0.5dB for the input RF power
ranged from -45dBm to 15 dBm, corresponding to a measurement error of less than
11%. An example of measured forward, reverse and averaged RF power deposition
over 10 seconds and 6 minutes for individual and combined RF channels, with the corresponding estimated global SAR and
local peak SAR values over 10 gram tissue of an human subject model, were displayed in a home-developed, user-friendly Qt5.3.2
(Nokia, Espoo, Finland) application program in the aforementioned PC computer (Fig. 3).
The communication between PC and FPGA is based on a high-speed user
datagram protocol (UDP) which can transfer the data at the rate of 50 Mbps.
CONCLUSIONS
We have developed an 8-channel FPGA-based real-time
power monitoring system for global and local SAR estimation to ensure patient
safety for high field MRI. The monitoring pathway exhibited a large dynamic
range of RF signal for about 100dB. The total insertion loss of the monitoring
system was about 0.2dB, which comes mainly from the directional coupler. The
error of the RF power measurement was within 0.5dB after calibration. The high
speed FPGA unit ensured fast processing of forward and reverse RF power
averaged over 10 seconds and 6 minutes separately for each channel. The
global and local peak SAR values were estimated with accuracy based on RF power measurements and EM simulation
results of a human subject model.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the CAS Major Scientific Equipment Grant
ZDYZ2010-2, CAS grants (XDB02010001, XDB02050001) and Chinese
MOST grant (2012CB825500).References
[1] Vaughan T, et al. Magn Reson Med 56(6): 1274,
2006. [2] Collins CM, et al. Magn Reson Med 65(5): 1470, 2011. [3] Zhu Y.
Magn Reson Med 51(4): 775, 2004. [4] IEC Medical
electrical equipment -Part 2-33, 2002. [5] El-Sharkawy AM, et al. Med
Phys, 39(5): 2334, 2012.