Ihsan Zainul1, Mahdi Abbasi1,2, and Gregor Schaefers1,3
1MR:comp GmbH, Gelsenkirchen, Germany, 2Faculty of Engineering/ATE, Duisburg-Essen University, Duisburg, Germany, 3MRI-STaR GmbH, Gelsenkirchen, Germany
Synopsis
The interaction between the gradient induced eddy current and the static magnetic field in the MRI system generates force and torque to a conductive implant if the eddy current magnetic moment and static magnetic field are misaligned. A frequency-domain solver (F-solver) of full-wave simulator CST studio suite 2015 was employed as an initial step to calculate the surface current induced due to the gradient field-induced switching.Introduction
The rapid switching of the gradient field
generated by the gradient coil of an MRI system generates a gradient-induced
eddy current magnetic moment. The
interaction between the gradient induced eddy current and the static magnetic
field in the MRI system generates force and torque to a conductive
implant if the eddy current
magnetic moment and static magnetic field are misaligned [1]. Force and torque
generate a vibration which could create several harmful effects to a patient
such as patient discomfort and pain. Therefore, a safety effect regarding the
vibration of an implant has become one standard of MRI safety tests. The magnetic
force generated on a conductive material is given in the following equation
$$F(t) = I(t) \int_{}^{} (dl \times B\scriptsize0)~~~~~~~~~~\normalsize(1),$$
where is current that flows through element wire and represents the static magnetic field. The
force as a function of surface current over
time t can be formulated as
$$F(t) = \int_{}^{} K(t) \times B\scriptsize0\normalsize ~~da~~~~~~~~~~(2),$$
where represents the grid of the implant surface.
The surface current induced to an implant described in
Eq. (2) is strongly influenced by the gradient field, geometry and orientation
of the implant in the scanner. A
numerical simulation was performed in order to calculate the surface current over
the surface of the implant. Finally, the vibration simulation was derived from the
surface current distribution.
Method
A
frequency-domain solver (F-solver) of full-wave simulator CST studio
suite 2015 was employed as an initial step to calculate the surface current
induced due to the gradient field-induced switching. The calculated surface
current that conformed the surface of the implant was exported to an in-house
developed post processing framework based on Eq. (2). Subsequently, the process
was repeated for different phases of the excitation signal. Finally, a
trajectory of displacement of the implant over a period of the excitation
signal was calculated. Figures 1 and 2 show the
calculation of the surface current on a copper disk with radius of 1.5 cm and
thickness of 0.5 mm at a frequency of 2.5 kHz for coronal and sagittal
orientation respectively. The copper disk was located at the center of a
z-direction Helmholtz coil. The Helmholtz coil was modeled as a two-circular
wire with radius of 10 cm. The input signal is a sinusoidal
signal. The sagittal orientation indicates a higher surface current
distribution in comparison to the coronal.
Results
The normalized
displacement of both orientations of the copper disk, derived from the mass
point force equation are compared in Fig. 3. As shown in Fig. 3, the maximum displacement of the sagittal orientation
is higher than the coronal since the vector
of static magnetic field and the surface current of the coronal orientation
are more aligned. In this calculation, the mechanic influence of the adjacent tissue of the implant was neglected
and the implant was assumed as a rigid object. However, this procedure
can be implemented to a complex geometry for different orientations.
Conclusion
A simulation procedure of the gradient
field-induced vibration of an implant in an MRI system is proposed in this
contribution. The force and the displacement were calculated based on the
surface current distribution on the implant. Surface current simulations of a
copper disk for two orientations were compared to describe the vibration
effect. This procedure could be used for a worst-case analysis regarding the
orientation of the implant in the gradient coil of an MRI system.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] ISO/TS 10974 Ed. 1 (2012), “Assessment for the
safety of magnetic resonance imaging for patients with an active implantable
medical device”; International Standards
Organization Technical Specification