Mahsa Fatahi1, Annika Reddig2, Vijayalaxmi Vijayalaxmi3, Bjoern Friebe4, Dirk Roggenbuck 5,6, Dirk Reinhold2, and Oliver Speck1,7,8,9
1Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany, 2Institute of Molecular and Clinical Immunology, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany, 3Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, United States, 4Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany, 5Faculty of Natural Sciences, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Senftenberg, Germany, 6Medipan GmbH, Dahlewitz/Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 7Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany, 8Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Magdeburg, Germany, 9German Center for Neurodegenerative Disease, Magdeburg, Germany
Synopsis
Synopsis.
Ultra-high
field magnetic resonance imaging (UHF MRI) is a technological development which
is now only used for research purpose. Healthy individuals working with UHF MRI
scanners as well as those participating in research investigations are
repeatedly exposed to high field strengths, which can be >2-fold greater
than those regularly used in clinics. In this study, we have examined the
extent of genetic damage in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) obtained
from such individuals exposed to 7T MRI.Purpose
To
assess the extent of genetic damage in PBMC obtained from individuals
repeatedly (whole body) exposed in vivo to MRI at 7T
Introduction
MRI
scanners with field strengths of up to 3T are currently used for clinical
purposes. Apart from comprehensive reviews
1, there have been some
investigations examining the extent of genetic damage in human PBMC collected
from individuals exposed to MRI. These studies were critically reviewed
2
and few others were published more recently
3-5.However the MRI
exposure in these studies was at field strengths of up to 3T,single and of
short duration. The current investigation had two objectives.
(1) Evaluation of
genetic damage in PBMC obtained from healthy individuals working with and
around UHF 7T MRI scanners as well as healthy volunteers who participate
frequently in 7T MRI research investigations. These individuals were repeatedly
exposed to 7T MRI. The observations were compared with those in healthy
individuals who were not exposed to MRI and in positive control cells exposed
to 0.2 Gy γ-radiation.
(2) Lymphocytes from these individuals were additionally
exposed in vitro to 7T MRI for 1 hour in order to determine any further impact
of in vitro exposure on genetic damage.
Methods
Twenty
two healthy male individuals, non-smoking, non-alcoholics, between the ages of
22 and 54 years participated in the study. The damage in PBMC was assessed
using anti-γH2AX immunofluorescence staining of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB)
in un-stimulated cells at 1, 20 and 72 hours post-exposure and by
quantification of micronuclei (MN) in activated cells. For the additional in
vitro exposures, the Echo Planar Imaging pulse sequence with an 8-channel head coil was used in normal operating
mode for 1 hour. The sequences utilized an average RF power of 50 W, a maximum
gradient strength of 65.43 mT/m and a maximum slew rate of 186 mT/m/ms. The TR and flip angle were adjusted to reach the maximum
permissible SAR level for the head.
Results
The
results obtained for DSB (γ-H2AX foci/cell) and MN in REP and CTL cells as well
as in positive controls expose to 0.2 Gy γ -radiation are presented in Fig.1
and Fig.2. Our results did not indicate significant differences in the baseline
γH2AX foci and MN between individuals repeatedly exposed to 7 T MRI and
un-exposed individuals. The results from in
vitro exposure of cells to 7 T MRI did not have additional impact: In
contrast, positive control cells exposed to 0.2 Gy g-radiation showed
significant increase in DSB and MN.
Discussion
The results in our investigation indicated that repeated 7T MRI exposure was
not able to induce excess genetic damage. Such exposure can be considered safe.
However, further large-scale investigations examining biological consequences
using potentially more sensitive biomarkers may be needed to transfer UHF MRI
into a widespread diagnostic tool and address concerns raised in previous
publications.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by
the Initial Training Network, HiMR, funded by the FP7 Marie Curie Actions of
the European Commission (FP7-PEOPLE-2012-ITN-316716).
Conflict
of Interest:
Dirk Roggenbuck is a shareholder of GA
Generic Assays GmbH and Medipan GmbH being diagnostic manufacturers. The
remaining authors declare no conflict of interest. The Dept. of Biomedical Magnetic Resonance receives research
support from Siemens Healthcare. This support, however, is not related to the
subject of the current study.
References
1.
SCENIHR. Scientific Committee on
Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks. 2015. Potential health effects of
exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF). Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific
2.
Vijayalaxmi. Fatahi M, Speck O. Magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI): A review of genetic damage investigations. Mutat Res.
764: 51-63, 2015.
3.
Reddig A,
Fatahi M, Friebe B, et al. Analysis of DNA double-strand breaks and
cytotoxicity after 7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of isolated human
lymphocytes. PLoS ONE. 2015;
10:e032702.
4. Brand M, Ellmann SS, Sommer M,
et al. Influence of cardiac MR imaging on DNA
double-strand breaks in human blood lymphocytes. Radiology. 2016; doi:10.1148/radiol.2015150555.
5. Lancellotti P, Nchimi A, Delierneux C,et al. Biological effects of
cardiac magnetic resonance on human blood cells. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 8:e003697. doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.115.003697.