A High Power RF Gated Wireless Power Transfer System
Kelly Byron1, Pascal Stang2, Shreyas Vasanawala3, John Pauly1, and Greig Scott1

1Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States, 2Procyon Engineering, San Jose, CA, United States, 3Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States

Synopsis

If wireless patient coils could be realized, they would reduce setup time and reduce worry about the liability of the connectors on coils. Battery powering these coils would limit scan time, so it is desirable to use wireless power transfer (WPT), which uses inductively coupled resonant coils to transmit and receive power at a particular frequency. With RF gating, imaging while receiving up to 11W is demonstrated and shown to have minimal impact on image quality.

Introduction

If wireless patient coils could be realized, they would reduce setup time, improve workflow, and reduce worry about the liability of the connectors on coils. Battery powering these coils would limit scan time, so it is desirable to use wireless power transfer (WPT), which uses inductively coupled resonant coils to transmit and receive power at a particular frequency. Wireless coils would require about 100mW per channel, so our goal is to deliver about 10W of power wirelessly. The WPT system shown in Figure 1, which is a modified version of the system proposed in 1 , is able to deliver power inside an MRI bore with minimal RF interactions through the use of RF gating. We present both MRI and bench-top tests detailing the capabilities and limits of this system.

Methods

We constructed a 45x30cm drive loop incorporating 64 MHz traps and tuned for series resonance at 10 MHz. Power harvesting was accomplished by a one turn, 20.3cm diameter flexible pickup loop, tuned to 10MHz with a combination of series and parallel capacitors, in order to change both the real and imaginary part of the impedance2. In order to maintain the required power level while gating the WPT system off during the readout time interval a 10mF storage capacitor was added at the output of the rectifier. Gating was accomplished by adding a RF switch at the input of the power amplifier on the transmit side. The switch was controlled by a signal coming from a Medusa module for the head coil images and was trigger delayed from the TX exciter unblank signal for the body coil images.

Results

The tuned pickup loop induces an impedance on the drive loop that is much higher than the parasitic resistance of the drive loop. This should result in a high efficiency, with most of the power being transferred to the pickup loop. However, this induced impedance is only a few ohms, so the long cables connecting the drive loop to the power amplifier outside the scan room can become a dominant loss in the system. As a result, we designed a quarter-wavelength block to immediately up-convert the coupled coil impedance, increasing our system efficiency from 11.5% to 47.3% in bench-top tests. In the MRI bore the efficiency drops to 33.5%, due to further increasing the cable length and due to the proximity of the large drive loop to the shield inside the bore, which decreased the inductance of the coil causing a shift in the tuning. This efficiency is sufficient to do a high power demonstration, wirelessly powering an 11W light bulb which turns on and off as we cycle the drive power on and off at 1Hz, as shown in the video of Figure 2. Figure 3 shows a video of the 11W bulb being wirelessly powered while imaging, with an initial charging time for the storage capacitor and then turning the WPT system off during the MR receive window. The light bulb stays lit while the power is being cycled on and off because the storage capacitor is able to continuously deliver power, however it does dim slightly. MRI testing with a loaded head coil controlled by a Medusa module is shown in Figure 4. With no harvesting, transmit powers of up to about 5W had a minimal impact on image quality (4b), however, continuous harvesting of only 1W causes a large enough increase in background noise that the image is wiped out (4c). With the addition of RF gating, there is almost no change in the background noise when harvesting 1W to a resistor load (4d) and only a slight increase powering an 11W light bulb (4e and 4f). Further MRI testing using the whole body coil of the scanner and a 5in receive surface coil is shown in Figure 5. With RF gating, there is only a slight increase in background noise while harvesting power (5b and 5c).

Discussion & Conclusions

With RF gating, imaging with a Medusa module while receiving up to 11W is demonstrated and shown to have minimal impact on image quality. Imaging with the MRI gradients and body coil is also shown to have little impact on images, demonstrating that our system does not significantly couple to the MRI coils. Efficiency is significantly improved by adding a quarter-wavelength block to immediately up-convert the impedance of the coupled coils. Future work adding a voltage regulator and changing the geometry of the coils could potentially improve efficiency further.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank GE Healthcare for their research support. This project is supported by grants R01EB008108, P01CA159992, and R01EB019241.

References

1. K. Byron, P. Stang, S. Vasanawala, J. Pauly, and G. Scott, RF Gated Wireless Power Transfer System. Proc. Intl. Sco. Mag. Reson. Med. 23 (2015).

2. Z. N. Low, Chinga, R.A., R. Tseng, and J. Lin, Design and Test of a High-Power High-Efficiency Loosely Coupled Planar Wireless Power Transfer System. Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on , vol.56, no.5, pp.1801-1812 (May 2009).

Figures

Figure 1: Complete wireless power transfer test setup.

Figure 2: Wirelessly powering an 11W light bulb as the input drive power is cycled on and off at 1Hz.

Figure 3: Wirelessly powering an 11W light bulb while RF gating the transmit power during imaging.

Figure 4: Test setup and image results inside an MRI bore with RMS background noise numbers given for A: WPT off, B: RFPA 5W, no harvester, C: Harvesting 1W continuously, D: Harvesting 1W, RF gating on, E: Harvesting 11W, RF gating on, F: Harvesting 11W, RF gating on and modulating power.

Figure 5: Test setup and image results inside an MRI bore with RMS background noise numbers given for A: WPT off, B: Harvesting 1W, RF gating on, C: Harvesting an estimated 5W, RF gating on.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
3624