Michael Ohliger1, Cornelius von Morze1, Lucas Carvajal1, Irene Marco-Rius1, Jao Ou1, and Daniel Vigneron1
1Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
Synopsis
RF
coil arrays are critically important for hyperpolarized C-13 imaging because of
increased sensitivity, coverage, and speed. A major limitation preventing
widespread use of coil arrays is the difficulty measuring coil sensitivity
profiles due to low C-13 natural abundance. We propose to solve this problem by
using fiducial markers filled with 55Mn to determine coil location and then
calculate coil sensitivities. We show proof-of-principle using a single RF coil
and ethylene glycol phantom. Coil sensitivties derived from fiducial markers
and quasitstatic calculations closely match those acquired through experiment.Introduction
Hyperpolarized
(HP) 13C MRI is a powerful tool for imaging tissue metabolism. As HP
MRI moves into the clinic, the use of surface coils will become more and
more important. Surface coils permit increased sensitivity for small
metabolites and coil arrays enable rapid parallel MRI techniques, which are
especially important given the relatively short duration available to image HP
substrates
1. A major challenge for parallel HP
13C
MRI is determining the coil sensitivities. Unlike conventional 1H imaging,
there is too little natural abundance
13C signal for sensitivity calibration.
Because of the small matrix size of most HP acquisitions, autocalibrated
techniques dramatically limit the achievable acceleration
2. We propose to address the problem of coil
sensitivity measurement by computing sensitivity profiles based on electromagnetic
simulation informed by coil positions measured using an array of small fiducial
markers filled with a dense signal source (
55Mn) placed at known
locations with respect to the coil conductors.
55Mn has a resonance
frequency close enough to
13C to be detected using the same hardware
3. However the resonant frequency is far enough
from
13C that it can be detected with no background, permitting the
locations to be measured automatically and without expending any HP
13C signal.
Methods
Fiducial markers were constructed from hollow 6.35 mmhigh
density polyethylene spheres (Precision Plastic Ball Co, Fig 1) that were
filled with approximately 40 µl 3M 55Mn solution. A 10 cm x 4.8 cm
transmit/receive radiofrequency surface coil (Fig 2a) was constructed and tuned
to 32 MHz. Three 55Mn markers were placed alongside the coil conductors (arraows,
Fig 2a). A CT image of the coil together with the markers was obtained (Fig 2b)
in order to determine the relationship between the markers and the conductor
path.
MR experiments were performed using a 3T scanner (MR750,
General Electric Medical Systems). The RF coil was placed on top of a
cylindrical phantom, which was placed into the MR scanner at an oblique angle
(Fig 3a, approximately 45 degrees with respect to the z-axis. 55Mn
fiducial markers were localized via three 1D gradient-echo projections with a readout
gradient along either the x-, y-, or z-axis (BW 125khz, readout gradient 4
G/cm, 313 spectral points). Spatial
position of the fiducial markers were determined by extracting the peak
positions on each of the 3 projections. Reference coil sensitivity was measured
by obtaining a 2D CSI image of the ethylene glycol phantom (matrix 16x32, FOV
8cm x 16cm, voxel 5 mm x 5 mm, slice 10 mm).
Data processing was performed in Matlab (Mathworks, Inc).
The position of the fiducial markers measured using the CT scan was mapped to
the MR-derived spatial position by least-squares estimation4. The spatial transformation
derived from the fiducial markers was then applied to the coil array conductor
pattern. The coil sensitivity expected from the conductor pattern was then calculated
using the principle of reciprocity and Biot-Savart quasi-static approximation
(valid for the long carbon wavelength at 3T).
Results
CT topogram of the coil with fiducial markers is shown in
Fig. 2b. After extracting the spatial positions from the CT scan, the digitized
conductor path is displayed together with the triangle formed by the three
markers (Fig. 2c). Spectra obtained along each spatial projection are shown in
Fig. 3b. After applying the 3D least-squares spatial transformation, the
transformed CT-derived fiducial markers align with the measured fiducial marker
positions nearly perfectly (RMS error 0.54mm). In addition, the oblique orientation
of the transformed conductor path matches the orientation of the RF coil in the
MR scanner (Fig 3c). The coil sensitivity pattern predicted by the transformed
simulated conductor elements matches the measured sensitivity pattern
qualitatively. Note the difference in shape between two profiles reflected by
the round ethylene glycol phantom. The plot through the midline of both images shows good agreement between measured and calculated values.
Discussion
55Mn-based fiducial markers are a practical way to localize
RF coils used for hyperpolarized 13C imaging. Using point sources that resonate
at a frequency far from
13C, the markers can be localized by peaks in a
projection image, which is easy to automate. The markers do not appear in the
13C image and so they can be left permanently on the coil. Future
studies are necessary to determine the optimal number of projections required
to localize RF coils reliably. In addition, this method can be extended to coil
arrays to determine coil sensitivities for parallel imagining reconstructions.
Acknowledgements
Funding From: RSNA Research and Education Foundaton, NIH P41EB013598, K01DK099451References
1. Arunachalam A,
Whitt D, Fish K, Giaquinto R, Piel J, Watkins R, Hancu I. Accelerated
spectroscopic imaging of hyperpolarized C-13 pyruvate using SENSE parallel
imaging. NMR Biomed 2009;22:867–873. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1401.
2. Ohliger MA, Larson PEZ, Bok RA, et al.
Combined parallel and partial fourier MR reconstruction for accelerated
8-channel hyperpolarized carbon-13 in vivo magnetic resonance Spectroscopic
imaging (MRSI). J Magn Reson Imaging 2013;38:701–713. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23989.
3. Morze von C, Carvajal L, Reed GD, Swisher
CL, Tropp J, Vigneron DB. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Magn Reson Imaging
2014;32:1165–1170. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.08.030.
4.
http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/26186-absolute-orientation-horn-s-method