Valery Ozenne1, Thibaud Troadec1, Pierre Bour1, Solenn Toupin1,2, Erik Dumont3, and Bruno Quesson1
1Institut Hospitalier Universitaire : LIRYC Institut de Rythmologie et Modélisation Cardiaque, Bordeaux, France, 2Siemens France, Saint Denis, France, 3Image Guided Therapy, Bordeaux, France
Synopsis
Although catheter-based radiofrequency (RF)
ablation is increasingly used to treat cardiac arrhythmia, insufficient
temperature increase may lead to incomplete treatment whereas excessive local
energy deposition may result in severe adverse effects (e.g. esophageal
fistulas or tamponade due to steam pop). Since MR thermometry can monitor in real-time
the temperature distribution in the cardiac muscle, automatic regulation of RF energy
deposition from temperature images, using
well established proportional, integral controller algorithms, may improve safety and efficiency of the
therapeutic procedure.Target audience:
Researchers in
interventional MRI and physicians with interest in temperature imaging and MR
guided cardiovascular catheterization
Background
Although catheter-based radiofrequency (RF) ablation
is increasingly used to treat cardiac arrhythmia, insufficient temperature
increase may lead to incomplete treatment whereas excessive local energy
deposition may result in severe adverse effects such as myocardial tissue
disruption (e.g. esophageal fistulas or tamponade due to steam pop). Since MRI
can monitor in real-time the temperature distribution in the cardiac muscle1,
automatic regulation of RF energy deposition from temperature images may improve
safety and efficiency of the therapeutic procedure. In this study, we demonstrate
the potential of such an automatic regulation using well established proportional,
integral controller algorithms, adapted to monopolar and bi-polar RF ablation
configurations. Experiments were performed ex-vivo on a sample of beef muscle.
Method
MR thermometry: temperature
images were acquired at 1.5 T (Avanto, Siemens Healthcare) using a multi-slice,
single shot echo planar imaging (TE=20ms, TR=85ms, FA=60°, Bandwidth=1568
Hz/Pixel, acceleration factor = 2, Partial Fourier=6/8) sequence with 110x110
voxels, leading to a 1.6x1.6x3mm3 spatial resolution.
RF-ablation device: Two cylindrical (diameter 1mm, length 5 mm) home-made
MR-compatible RF electrodes were inserted into a piece of beef muscle and
connected to a programmable RF generator (Image Guided Therapy, Pessac France)
located outside the Faraday cage. Image reconstruction and temperature calculation
was performed using the Gadgetron reconstruction framework
2.
Control algorithm: A dedicated regulation gadget was implemented to adjust
energy deposition from online temperature images and a predefined
temperature-time target profile. The control algorithm used 3x3 pixels
ROI in the heated region to calculate the mean temperature value. The new output
power was computed using a proportional-integral algorithm integrating the last available mean temperature
data and next target temperature value to reach. Processing time for the
regulation gadget was lower than 50 ms, ensuring real-time operation with the
acquisition update rate of 5 temperature slices/s of the thermometry sequence. This
regulation loop was tested for two configurations, namely bipolar RF ablation and
monopolar ablation, the 3x3 pixel was positioned, respectively, in the
middle of both and centered on one electrode.
Results
Figure 1 (top row) displays magnitude and
temperature data for a bipolar (1 cm inter-electrode distance) ablation. The
graph on the right shows the target temperature profile (blue curve), the mean
(green curve) and the maximal temperature increases (red curve) over the 3x3
ROI. Residual oscillation of 2°C can be observed on the green curve for a
targeted temperature increase of 20°C, with a maximal experimental temperature
increase of 28°C. Figure 1 (bottom row) displays similar data for the
experiment performed in the monopolar configuration. A latency of the green
curve as compared to the target curve was observed, due to maximal output power
set on the generator by the regulation algorithm. The maximal temperature increase
was also higher (33°C) than for the bipolar configuration. This can be
explained by stronger temperature gradients in the heated area as compared to
the bipolar configuration, leading to a higher difference between the mean and
maximal temperature values within the ROI. Since the regulation was performed
on the average value, higher temperature increase were expected. However, for
both monopolar and bipolar configurations, assuming an initial body temperature
of 37°C for a clinical application, the maximal temperature increase would have
remained below 70°C, far below the boiling temperature.
Discussion and
Conclusion
The implemented
regulation gadget was fast enough to ensure real-time update of RF power at a
realistic update rate of 5 images/cardiac cycle. The proposed algorithm is
simple to implement and allows controlling the mean temperature increase in a
restricted region whose dimensions correspond to lesion sizes observed in common
RF ablation procedures in the heart (~8 mm in diameter). Temperature control on
the mean value over a ROI increases the safety of the procedure as compared to
single pixel approach
3, particularly in presence of a mobile organ
such as the heart where the catheter position may vary during the RF energy
deposition for successive acquisitions of MR temperature images. More
sophisticated algorithms may be implemented in future work to avoid exceeding a
predefined maximal value, with the aim of reducing the risks of creating tissue
disruption. Also, the regulation quality on the mean temperature value may be
improved by adding a derivative term to the control algorithm, as suggested in
4
to cancel temperature oscillations observed in the present work. Such
temperature regulation are expected to improve safety and efficiency of the MR-guided
catheter-based RF ablation, after in vivo validation on large animal models.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1Ozenne V et al. Proc. ISMRM. 2014; Toronto. 2Hansen
MS, Sørensen TS. MRM 2013;69:1768–1776. 3Quesson B et al. MRM
2002 Jun;47(6):1065-72. 4Salomir R MRM 2000
Mar;43(3):342-7