Frank Zijlstra1, Job G Bouwman1, Marinus A Moerland2, and Peter R Seevinck1
1Image Sciences Institute, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 2Department of Radiotherapy, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Synopsis
We present a method which can accurately localize brachytherapy seeds in MRI using fast MR simulations and template matching. In 5 patients we correctly detected and localized 298 out of 307 seeds. Using this method an MRI-only approach to post-implant dosimetry will be possible, which should increase accuracy by not requiring CT to MRI image registration.Target audience
Researchers with interest in
localizing para- and diamagnetic objects in MR images, metal artifacts and/or MR
simulation.
Purpose
Post-implant dosimetry is an
important tool for quality assurance of low-dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy of
the prostate
1, where small radiation sources (brachytherapy seeds)
are permanently implanted in the prostate to locally deliver a planned dose. In
current clinical practice, X-ray based techniques are often used to locate the
seeds to calculate the dose distribution, while MRI is used to delineate the
prostate and organs at risk. As this requires both CT and MRI scanning,
followed by an image registration procedure, this workflow increases patient
burden and costs, and renders the procedure labor intensive and error-prone
when compared to an MRI only approach. In this study we present a novel method
for automatically localizing brachytherapy seeds using only MRI, based on
simulation of the metal artifacts originating from the implanted seeds.
Contrary to methods that only visualize seeds, such as methods based on
susceptibility
2 or co-RASOR
3, this method exactly determines
the seed locations and rotations, which are needed for dosimetry.
Methods
Acquisition:
We acquired fast 3D SSFP scans
(matrix 376x292x75, resolution 1.2 mm isotropic, TE/TR 2.7/4.6 ms, flip angle
10°, scan time 130 seconds) at 3 Tesla (Ingenia, Philips, Best, The Netherlands)
for 5 prostate cancer patients. One month prior to the scans the patients were treated
with I-125 brachytherapy seeds (selectSeed model 130.002, Isotron, Berlin,
Germany), with 40 to 85 seeds implanted per patient.
Simulation:
We used MRI simulation to
predict the artifacts around a seed placed in a uniform background. The induced
field perturbation was calculated4 at a high resolution using an
exact model of the brachytherapy seed (Fig 1b). We used a fast simulation
method which simulated only the effect of field perturbations on the spatial
encoding process (i.e. signal shift, voids and dephasing) (Fig 1c). The
simulation time was approximately 300 seconds per 3D scan on a Xeon E5-1607 CPU.
Template matching:
The artifacts were simulated for 321 different orientations of the brachytherapy
seed with respect to B0. Phase Correlation template matching5
was applied to the acquired in-vivo images using each simulation individually
as a template. Per voxel the orientation with the highest match intensity was
selected and candidate detections were found using a threshold on this match
intensity. To obtain the final detections,
the following procedure was used (assuming that the number of implanted seeds is known a priori):
1. For
each candidate detection linear regression was used to locally match the
acquired image intensity and phase to the corresponding template.
2. The
candidate with the lowest regression error is accepted as a final detection.
3. The
phase effect of the detected seed is cancelled in the image by subtracting the
phase predicted by the simulation.
4. Repeat
from 1 until the number of detections is equal to the number of implanted
seeds.
The final detections were
registered to CT and manually classified as true or false detections, and the
distance to the center of the seeds on CT was measured.
Results
Table 1 shows the detection
results for each of our patients. The mean sensitivity of the method was 0.97
and the worst case sensitivity 0.95 (subject 5). Figure 2
shows a 3D rendering of the detected seeds superimposed on the MRI scan and an
isosurface of the seeds in the registered CT scan.
Discussion & Conclusion
As opposed to existing MR-based
methods that visualize brachytherapy seeds, we presented a method that
automatically localizes seeds with high sensitivity. We have shown consistent
performance over multiple subjects, which indicates the method is robust
against anatomical variations and variations in the configuration of the seeds.
Missed and false detections were primarily caused by seeds that were in close
vicinity to each other. In these cases the MR artifacts interfere and are not
accurately predicted by single seed simulations. However, similar cases may
also cause missed detections in CT-based methods.
The locations resulting from
our method are intrinsically registered to other MRI scans from the same
session, on which the prostate and organs at risk are delineated. Therefore no
image registration is needed to perform dosimetry, which should increase the
accuracy of the calculated dose distributions. Furthermore, the exact
orientation of the seeds is known, which may improve the calculation of dose
distributions by taking into account the anisotropy of the dose resulting from
rotated seeds. In future research we will compare the proposed MRI-only
dosimetry to the current CT-MRI approach.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Moerland MA. Postimplant
Dosimetry. In: Interstitial Prostate Brachytherapy. Springer Berlin Heidelberg;
2013. pp. 157–168.
2. Dong Y, Chang Z, Xie G, Whitehead
G, Ji JX. Susceptibility-based positive contrast MRI of brachytherapy seeds. Magn. Reson.
Med. 2015;74:716–726.
3. Seevinck PR, de Leeuw H, Bos C,
Bakker CJG. Highly
localized positive contrast of small paramagnetic objects using 3D center-out
radial sampling with off-resonance reception. Magn. Reson. Med.
2011;65:146–156.
4. Bouwman JG, Bakker CJG. Alias subtraction more efficient than conventional
zero-padding in the Fourier-based calculation of the susceptibility induced
perturbation of the magnetic field in MR. Magn. Reson. Med. 2012;68:621–630.
5. Kuglin CD, Hines DC. The phase correlation image alignment method.
Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics and Society, 1975, pp. 63-165