Silke Lechner-Greite1, Matthew Tarasek2, Desmond Teck Beng Yeo2, and Florian Wiesinger1
1GE Global Research, Munich, Germany, 2GE Global Research, Albany, NY, United States
Synopsis
Monitoring
temperature changes in the human skull is important in clinical transcranial
MR-guided focused ultrasound, as it can absorb a large amount of energy during
sonication and thereby produce heat. We propose to extract relative temperature
information from proton density weighted zero TE imaging and additionally
calibrate the T1 signal contamination effect.Purpose
To investigate proton density (PD)- and T1-weighted
zero TE (ZTE) imaging for temperature mapping in MR visible tissues such as
cortical bone, muscle, or fat.
Several clinical thermotherapy techniques that
raise the temperature of regions in the body for tissue ablation or mild
hyperthermia gained traction in oncology. High intensity focused-ultrasound
(HIFU) is used for treatment in brain disorders (e.g. glioblastoma, essential
tremor, Parkinson). During transcranial HIFU under MR guidance, it is important
to monitor temperature changes in the human skull as it absorbs ultrasound with
~90x greater efficiency than soft tissue1. Cortical
bone has ultra-short T2 relaxation time (<1ms) and thus customized
acquisition techniques are required to capture the rapidly decaying MR signals
with sufficient signal to noise ratio (SNR)2. Recently,
ZTE MR bone imaging in the head was introduced3. Here, we propose to (i) extract relative temperature information from PD-weighted
ZTE images and (ii) additionally calibrate the signal contamination from T1
saturation effects.
Methods
According to
Boltzmann distribution and Curie law, the magnetization M0 depends
on the thermal equilibrium, where the susceptibility is inversely proportional
to the absolute temperature 1/T. For ZTE sequences with zero nominal echo time
TE (TE<<T2*), short repetition times (TR<<T1)
and small flip angles (α<<1), the steady state signal equation for
gradient echo sequences can be approximated by $$$y=\frac{\alpha*M_0}{1+\beta}$$$ with $$$\beta=\frac{T_1}{TR}\frac{\alpha^2}{2}$$$ (Eq.1).
PD-weighting is achieved by using very
small flip angles, whereas with increasing flip angles T1 signal
contamination gets more prominent.
To investigate the achievable SNR based on the analytically predicted
and optimized ZTE parameters, SNR efficiency was studied by acquiring 50 ZTE
images in the human head using a single-channel Tx/Rx head coil at 3T (MR750w, GE,
Waukesha, USA) (Figure 1a). The experiment was repeated 20 times using the body
coil. A dedicated T1/T2 quantification phantom
(DiagnosticSonar, Livingston, UK) consisting of 12 gadolinium-doped agarose
samples representing a range of T1/T2 relaxation
properties was used. The phantom was cooled to 6°C and placed inside the
scanner overnight. Temperature imaging was performed as it warmed to room
temperature by acquiring PD- and T1-weighted ZTE images (Figure 1b). Ground-truth temperature was measured using fluor-optic
probes (LumaSense Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) positioned inside the
setup. The overall change in temperature (ΔT) seen in experiments was ~9.8°C. Relative
temperature changes were calculated according to $$$\Delta T_{PD}=\frac{(WARM-COLD)}{0.5*(WARM+COLD)}/m_{PD}$$$ (Eq.2) with mPD≈-0.003 % /°C. T1 saturation effects were considered for by computing β from Eq.1 based on the ZTE data with
varying flip angles and calculating the relative temperature change from
β-corrected M0.
Results
Figure 2 shows the calculated ZTE
signals for ideal PD-weighting (β<<1),
a PD-weighting achieved with α=0.5° for bone (T
1 = 220ms)
and muscle (T
1 = 1.6s) plotted against ΔT assuming a TR=0.708ms.
Receiving with the body coil resulted in SNR of 44.95 (brain)
and 20.30 (bone); a SNR of 94.22 (brain) and 56.16 (bone) was obtained when
receiving with the head Tx/Rx coil (Figure 3). Overall, the head coil provides
a 2.1 and 2.7 fold increase of SNR in brain and bone respectively over the body
coil. This translates to an accuracy of 3°C
(brain) and 3.5 °C (bone) when using the head coil. Figure 4(a) shows a
T
1 map at room temperature extracted using ZTE images (α=1°/4°) used
for β-correction. Figures 4(b) and 4(c) show temperature maps of an axial slice
of the T
1/T
2 phantom calculated from PD-weighted ZTE
images without and with T
1-correction, respectively. A RMSE of 24.5%
(without T
1-correction) could be reduced to 1.5% with T
1-correction
applied (example in probe #2, T1≈220ms) (Figure 5).
Discussion&Conclusion
ZTE is known to most effectively achieve PD
weighting. It has high
spatiotemporal encoding efficiency, is robust to B0 and chemical
shift off-resonance effects, and is insensitive to eddy currents. Radial
sampling schemes are known to be motion-insensitive while acquisition, but
motion in between temperature measurements has a critical impact on accuracy
and therefore image registration needs to be applied when using ZTE for MR thermometry. Experiments performed here show that there are two
primary contributions to ZTE based thermometry accuracy: (i) SNR, and (ii) correction for
variability in ΔT1/°C.
High SNR is crucial for accurate temperature imaging, although the most
critical impact of this work shows that ZTE based thermometry measurements must take into
account and correct for contamination from T1 saturation effects and it is expected to further enhance accuracy through B1-correction.
To conclude, ZTE based MR thermometry with T1-correction
is a promising technique for temperature quantification in muscle tissue and
bone.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1 Hendee et al. Medical Imaging Physics, 4th Edition. Wiley-Liss, 1992.
2 Han et al. Imaging
temperature changes in cortical bone using ultrashort echo-time MRI. ISMRM22,
#0263, 2014.
3 Wiesinger et
al. Zero TE MR bone imaging in the head. Mag. Reson. Med. 01/2015.