Prostate Focal Prostate Laser Ablation under MRI Guidance
Alexander Squires1, Sheng Xu2, Reza Seifabadi2, Yue Chen1, Harsh Agarwal3, Marcelino Bernardo2, Ayele Negussie2, Peter Pinto2, Peter Chokye2, Bradford Wood2, and Zion Tsz Ho Tse1

1College of Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States, 2National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States, 3Philips Research North America, Briarcliff Manor, NY, United States

Synopsis

MRI-guided focal laser ablation (FLA) shows promise as an effective treatment for prostate cancer, but presents challenges related to accurate catheter positioning and ablation monitoring. A catheter positioning robot was designed to overcome these problems by positioning the catheter optimally for ablation and monitoring the ablation via MRI thermometry. A remote insertion guide allows the surgeon to perform the procedure without removing the patient from the MRI bore, saving time and increasing accuracy. Treatment planning software iteratively plans optimal catheter positioning. Preliminary tests show the robot can greatly improve efficiency and accuracy without sacrificing image quality.

Purpose

Most of the 240,000 men in the US diagnosed with prostate cancer annually [1] have low-risk, organ-confined disease eligible for targeted therapy, which spares patients from undesired side effects [2]. Focal Laser Ablation (FLA) rapidly heats targeted cancerous tissue using a laser catheter. Despite its minimally invasive nature, FLA has several technical limitations, mostly related to the difficulty of (1) locating the tumor accurately during surgery; (2) placing the catheter safely to fully ablate the tumor, which can require several placements for large tumors; and (3) monitoring the ablation zone.

In this paper, a robotic system was designed to improve MRI-guided prostate FLA. We hypothesized that accurate placements of laser catheters could be achieved under MRI guidance and robotic positioning, avoiding unnecessary gland punctures and ensuring the ablation covers the entire tumor, maximizing the utility of a minimally invasive system. The plan could be updated iteratively after each ablation using preoperative parametric MRI information combined with intraoperative MR thermometry [3].

Methods

Robotic Positioner

In an MRI setting, any robotic system must be made of plastics and small amounts of non-ferromagnetic metals for patient safety and image quality. Space in the cylindrical bore (55-70cm) of an MRI scanner is limited, and the small size of the prostate requires that the robot must occupy a square targeting region of approximately 50mm in the transverse plane; additional space between the needle guide and the bore opening is necessary to permit operation.

The design solution chosen is a slim robot design built around a Core-XY belt system (Fig. 1a). Targeting is controlled by two pneumatic motors attached to a single belt. A pair of fiber optic lines is integrated with each motor, generating quadrature pulses for positional encoding with a resolution of 0.005o.

The robot registers on the MRI coordinate system using five gadolinium fiducial markers (PinPoint, Beekley Inc., USA). This robot uses Visualase® laser ablation catheter kits.

Remote Insertion

A remote insertion guide (Fig. 1b) allows the user standing at the bore opening to insert the catheter under real-time MRI guidance. The remote insertion guide is aligned manually with the robot, and the catheter moves through the guide to the robot. The alignment cone (Fig. 1c) funnels the inserted catheter into the end-effector needle guide.

Software & Control

A LabVIEW™ (National Instruments, Austin, TX) interface displays the targeting workspace, end effector position, and controlled target position. Operators drive the end effector either manually or automatically. A position-seeking algorithm targets the tumor. The required motor rotations are calculated based on the desired change in position. Optical encoding tracks the current position. PID modulated PWM compressed air supply controls the motors.

Accuracy & Efficacy Testing

The system was tested for MRI compatibility, insertion accuracy, and workflow streamlining in a clinical 3.0T MRI system at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center.

Results

MRI Compatibility

The signal-to-noise (SNR) ratios of MR images in a homogenous phantom filled with CuO4 dilated saline were measured with the robot (1) absent, (2) present, and (3) in motion. The maximum SNR variation was within the acceptable range at <7.5%.

Accuracy Validated in MRI

Insertion accuracy was tested by performing brachytherapy seed placement on a prostate phantom (Fig. 2a-d). The positioning errors for the seed placements (n=10) were μ=0.9mm, σ=0.4mm perpendicular to the insertion axis, and μ=1.9mm, σ=2.7mm parallel to the insertion axis. The seed positions were calculated from a volumetric scan with perpendicular pixels of 1.18mm per side and image slices 3.5mm thick.

System Efficacy

Catheter ablation accuracy was also measured in trials with anatomical prostate phantoms with physical tumors (n=5) and temperature-sensitive phantoms with virtual tumors (n=8). Ablation position error was under 2mm (μ=1.7mm, σ=0.2mm). In every test (Fig. 2e), 100% of the tumor volume was ablated.

Conclusions

The robot was tested as an assistive technology for MRI-guided laser ablations. This FLA system increases accuracy in needle placement while enabling manually-driven remote insertions. The target tumor volumes were ablated according to the treatment plan, preserving the surrounding tissue regions. Future work includes animal and human studies to validate the effectiveness of the robot and software for MRI-guided FLA.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

[1] Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2014;64(1):9-29.

[2] O. Raz, M. A. Haider, S. R. Davidson, U. Lindner, E. Hlasny, R. Weersink, et al., "Real-time magnetic resonance imaging–guided focal laser therapy in patients with low-risk prostate cancer," European urology, vol. 58, pp. 173-177, 2010.

[3] S. Xu, J. Kruecker, H. Amalou, J. T. Kwak, and B. J. Wood, "Real-time treatment iterative planning for composite ablations," presented at the Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 28th International congress and Exhibition, Fukuoka, Japan, 2014.

Figures

Fig. 1. Prostate FLA robot system and remote insertion guide. (a) Robot from the surgeon’s perspective. (b) Surgeon’s view of the remote guide. (c) Alignment cone for funneling the insertion guide. (d) Demonstration of remote catheter insertion using extension arm.

Fig. 2. (a-d) Brachytherapy seeds after placement in prostate phantom and error quantifications. (e) Temperature-sensitive prostate phantom after focal laser ablation, showing darker ablated zones (blue arrows) and virtual tumor outline (green lines).



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
3599