Samantha Mikaiel1,2, James Simonelli3, David Lu1, Kyung Sung1,2, Tsu-Chin Tsao3, and Holden H Wu1,2
1Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 2Biomedical Physics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 3Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
Synopsis
In this work we investigate a new rolling-diaphragm-based
hydrostatic actuator design to achieve smooth remote manipulation without fluid
leakage for
MR-compatible robotic systems. We show that the actuators exhibit negligible impact
on MR image fidelity and SNR, the actuator provides a linear displacement response
over the fluid lines, and we were able to use the master/slave actuator pair to insert
and retract the needle in a phantom with no leakage and no noticeable friction
issues. Our new rolling-diaphragm hydrostatic actuators can potentially enable
physicians to remotely perform real-time MRI-guided interventions.Introduction
Limited accessibility to the patient in bore has restricted
the advancement of real-time MRI-guided interventions
(1), MR-compatible robotic
systems are a potential solution to overcome the limited accessibility. In
particular, hydrostatic actuation is inherently MR-compatible and can be designed
to be low-cost systems. In this work we investigate a new rolling-diaphragm-based
hydrostatic actuator design to achieve smooth remote manipulation without fluid
leakage. We evaluate its effects on MR images, characterize the linearity of
motion of the actuator, as well as demonstrate feasibility of remotely
manipulating instruments under real time MRI guidance.
Methods
[System Design] The
standard piston-based hydrostatic actuators are susceptible to fluid leakage and friction issues,
and we designed the new actuators (Fig.
1) using a rolling diaphragm(2) to fully seal the hydrostatic
cylinder. The diaphragms and actuator casing were all created in house. The identical
master/slave actuator pairs were then connected to closed fluid channels (filled
with water) to transmit force and displacement into the bore.
[Imaging
Assessment] All experiments were performed on a research-only
intraoperative MRI scanner (3.0T Prisma, Siemens). The slave actuator was placed
in the bore next to a sphere phantom (Fig.
2). Gradient echo (GRE) scans of the phantom with and without the actuator
were acquired. The images were then inspected for artifacts and the SNR was
calculated using the two-scan difference method(3). The process was repeated
with a grid phantom, where dimensions of the imaged grid lines with and without
the robotic system were measured to assess distortion.
[Linearity Assessment] A bench top test was performed by pushing the
master actuator in gradual increments until the extreme followed by pulling it
back, and measuring the displacement of the slave actuator using a pair of
laser doppler displacement meters with a resolution of 0.635 micron. The slave
actuator was then connected to an MR-compatible biopsy needle (Cook) and
inserted into a gelatin phantom. A high-resolution (1x1x1mm3) 3D GRE
scan was done with the needle in the fully retracted position, fully inserted
position, and finally retracted again to measure the stroke of the actuator.
[Feasibility under real-time MRI] Based
on visualization from a real-time GRE sequence at 2 frames/second, an operator
controlled the master actuator from the end of the patient table to evaluate
MR-guided insertion and retraction of the needle in a gelatin phantom.
Results
[Imaging Assessment]
No images artifacts were observed with the actuator inside the bore (Fig. 3). The SNR difference with and
without the actuator is on average only 1.2%. The grid phantom images showed no
distortion.
[Linearity Assessment]
The input of the master versus output of the slave displacement can be seen in Figure 4. Linearity is demonstrated for
both cases, slave actuator moves 0.9756 mm to every 1 mm displacement applied
by the master in the push direction. For the pull direction this ratio is 0.9467
mm to every 1 mm applied. The stroke was measured to be 17mm. Using the high
resolution 3D MRI scan, the stroke was measured to be 16mm,
where the 1-mm difference from the bench top measurement of 17mm is within the pixel resolution of the MRI scan.
[Feasibility
under real-time MRI] Under real-time
MRI guidance, the operator was able to easily and smoothly insert and retract
the needle in the phantom from the end of the patient table repeatedly (Fig. 5)
Discussion and Conclusion
Our rolling-diaphragm hydrostatic actuators exhibit
negligible impact on MR image fidelity and SNR. The actuator provides a linear
displacement response over the lines in both the push and pull direction. This is important for the operator to be able
to remotely and accurately manipulate the needle to target locations and avoid
important structures. Finally, we were
able to use the master/slave actuator pair to insert and retract the needle in
a phantom with no leakage and no noticeable friction issues. Our new
rolling-diaphragm hydrostatic actuators can potentially enable physicians to
remotely perform real-time MRI-guided interventions.
Acknowledgements
NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program
References
(1) Moche M, et al., JMRI 2010;31:964–74. (2)Whitney JP, et al., IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robot. Syst. 2014. (3)Dietrich O,et al., JMRI 2007;26:375–85