COSI Magnet: Halbach Magnet and Halbach Gradient Designs for Open Source Low Cost MRI
Lukas Winter1, Antonia Barghoorn1, Peter Blümler2, and Thoralf Niendorf1,3,4

1Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany, 2Institute of Physics, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany, 3Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC), a joint cooperation between the Charité Medical Faculty and the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany, 4MRI.TOOLS GmbH, Berlin, Germany

Synopsis

Cost effective open source imaging (COSI) is a collaborative initiative currently building an affordable low field open source MR scanner with the technical documentation available at www.opensourceimaging.org. As part of this initiative uniform Halbach magnets have been evaluated in absolute B0, field homogeneity, magnet mass and costs. Halbach quadrupoles are introduced, that produce an adjustable constant gradient field for spatial encoding removing the need for high power gradient amplifiers. Combining these efforts an imaging magnet (B0=0.3T, di=180mm) design is presented that can incorporate a Halbach gradient of 157mT/m. The results are encouraging for low cost low field MR applications.

Purpose

MRI is the most powerful diagnostic imaging modality available. The major drawbacks are cost and complexity, limiting its use mainly to industrialized countries and larger hospitals1. Multiple studies showed that there are several clinical applications where the diagnostic value gathered from low (B0=0.2T) field MRI is equivalent to the costly “high” field (B0≥1.0T) counterparts2-6. This work investigates permanent magnet Halbach arrangements for low cost low field imaging applications with a focus on absolute B0, field homogeneity, magnet mass and cost. The concept of Halbach quadrupoles is introduced to form constant gradient fields that can be rotated for spatial encoding removing the need for high power gradient amplifiers7. Technical documentation of the presented cost effective open source imaging (COSI) magnet will be made available based upon the principles of open source hardware at www.opensourceimaging.org.

Methods

Magnetostatic simulations (CST) were performed to investigate a spectrum of Halbach magnet arrangements tailored for low field MRI. To validate the simulations, a dedicated simulation setup was compared to experimental measurements of a Halbach magnet with an inner diameter of di=130mm (Fig.1a-b). After validation, B0, magnet radius, magnet mass as well as number of magnet units (n=16, n=20, n=24) were calculated for different Halbach arrangements with NdFeB magnets (ρ=7.4g/cm³, Br=1.2T) of varying size (Fig.2a-c). Two ring configurations (Fig.3a) were implemented that afford a uniform B0 volume in between the rings8. Halbach quadrupoles are introduced to enable constant gradient fields for distinct spatial encoding. Finally a COSI magnet was designed and characterized for extremity MRI with an inner diameter of di=180mm.

Results

Simulation results (Fig.1c) are in good agreement with measurements (Fig.1d). The absolute difference along an axial B0 profile through the center of the magnet was <10% (Fig.1e) with a relative difference <1% (Fig.1f).

Using fewer magnet units or a bigger magnet radius increases the magnet mass under the condition of B0=const (Fig.1d-e). A higher number of magnet units leads to improved homogeneity, since the theoretical periodic Halbach magnetization pattern can be recreated more accurately. Fitting the results to a single equation (for n=16 with the proportionality factor a(m) (Fig.1f)): $$B_0(r,m)=(23.3\cdot m+0.1311)/r^3$$ allows for a quick estimate on expected B0, magnet radius and mass.

Varying the distance of two ring Halbach configurations allows B0 homogenization for the central region along z-dimension (Fig.3b). For two Halbach rings (di=180mm, n=16) the optimal simulated distance is around 87mm, which is in close agreement with the theoretical value of $$$r\cdot \sqrt{2/3}=90mm$$$ (Fig.3c)8.

The arrangement of 16 octagonal magnets (Br=1.0T) to a Halbach quadrupole with radius ri1≈18cm is illustrated in Fig.4a. The field profile By (Fig.4b) shows a rapid exponential decay in close vicinity to the magnets (Fig.4c) and a linear decay of 50mT/m in the center (Fig.4d). Reducing the radius of the arrangement to ri2≈13cm allows to increase the gradient strength to dBy/dy=157mT/m (Fig.4d). With this achievement spatial encoding can be performed by means of rotating the quadrupole instead of the whole imaging magnet1 while the gradient strength can be adjusted changing the quadrupole radius mechanically without the need for costly gradient amplifiers. Rotation and repositioning is feasible with moderate efforts, since the main Halbach magnet has no net magnetic field at the outside.

Combining all these efforts a possible Halbach magnet (di=180mm) for extremity MRI together with Halbach gradients (dBy/dy=157mT/m, di=270mm) is exemplified in Fig.5a. The Halbach magnet weighs <45kg and provides an absolute B0>0.3T with a net magnetic field of B0≈0 at the outside (Fig.5b). The homogeneity of the Halbach magnet can be deduced from Fig.5c-f. Without any additional shimming the 1000ppm area is (62x50)mm² as shown in Fig.5c. Along 4cm in x- and y-direction the field deviates by 192ppm (Fig.5d) and 574ppm (Fig.5e) respectively.

Conclusion

The combination of uniform Halbach (dipole) magnets with superimposed Halbach quadrupoles is encouraging for low cost low field imaging applications. Utilizing quadrupoles with their excellent gradient field linearity for efficient spatial encoding reduces rotation to the smaller quadrupole magnets only7 with the gradient strength being modified by simple mechanical displacement. Significant improvements in B0 homogeneity could be achieved under the constraints of small and light construction for “mobile” applications. Low static magnetic fields inside B0≈0.3T and B0≈0 outside the imaging volume improve safety by reducing attraction forces of ferromagnetic objects such as medical equipment or implants. At the same time permanent magnets don’t require a constant/stable power supply and don’t need risk management concerning a quench. Mechanically adjustable imaging gradients furthermore allow for significant noise reduction versus traditional pulsed field gradients used in today’s clinical practice.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

[1] Rylands-Monk F, Aunt Minnie Europe, 2015 [2] Pääkkö E, Eur Radiol, 2005; 15(7):1361-8 [3] Ejbjerg B, Ann Rheumat Dis, 2005; 64(9):1280-7 [4] Kersting-Sommerhoff B, Eur Radiol, 1996; 6(4):561-5 [5] Parizel PM, Eur J Radiol, 1995; 19(2):132-8 [6] Jhaveri K, JMRI, 2015; 41(4):866-9 [7] Cooley CZ, MRM, 2015; 73(2):872-83 [8] Soltner H and Blümler P, Conc Magn Res Part A, 2010; 36(4):211-22

Figures

Figure 1 – Comparison of (a) magnetostatic simulations and (b) measurement setup of the Halbach array. (c) simulated and (d) measured 2D B0 fields in the center of a single Halbach ring (3mm spatial resolution). (e) absolute and (f) normalized simulated and measured profiles along the dotted central line.

Figure 2 – Investigated relationship between single magnet size and mass, number of magnets used, radius and B0. (a) n=16, (b) n=20 and (c) n=24 rectangular magnets (Br=1.2T). (d) relationship between radius and magnet mass, (e) relationship between radius and absolute B0 in the center of the magnet.

Figure 3 – (a) Simulation setup of two Halbach ring (n=16) configurations. (b) Dependency of the B0 field along z-direction on the distance between the rings. (c) Standard deviation of B0 in relation to the ring distance with a minimum at around 87mm.

Figure 4 – (a) Simulation setup of the Halbach quadrupole (ri1=18cm, n=16, Br=1.0T) and (b) the simulated By field gradient. (c) By along the dashed arrow in (a). (d) Results in the central region (10cm distance) displaying the linearity of the gradient for different Halbach quadrupole magnet radii.

Figure 5 – (a) Halbach magnet (di=180mm) for extremity imaging at B0=0.3T with a mechanically adjustable Halbach quadrupole (Fig.4, r2=13cm). (b) Simulated By field of the Halbach magnet. (c) Area of 1000ppm homogeneity and (d-f) line plot along x-, y- and z-direction through the center of the magnet.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
3568