Adaptive Integrated Parallel Reception, Excitation, and Shimming (iPRES) with Bipolar Junction Transistors.
Dean Darnell1, Trong-Kha Truong1, and Allen Song1

1Brain Imaging and Analysis Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States

Synopsis

An integrated parallel reception, excitation, and shimming coil array with N DC shim loops within each RF coil, termed iPRES(N), improves the shimming of local B0 inhomogeneities relative to the original iPRES design with one loop per coil, but requires N times more power supplies which adds complexity and cost. A new adaptive iPRES design is proposed that uses bipolar junction transistors to generate different DC current paths, and hence different B0 fields for local shimming, within each coil using one power supply per coil, thus maintaining the shimming flexibility of iPRES(N) while reducing the number of power supplies.

Introduction

Multi-coil B0 shimming with a set of local shim coils1,2 can provide a more effective correction of local B0 inhomogeneities than spherical harmonic shimming. However, it requires an additional shim coil array inside or outside the RF coil, which decreases either the SNR or shimming performance due to RF shielding between the coils or an increased distance between the subject and shim coil array, respectively. To eliminate this trade-off, an integrated parallel reception, excitation, and shimming (iPRES) concept was proposed that integrates a DC shim loop onto each coil element of an RF coil array, so that both DC and RF currents can flow on the same coils simultaneously while remaining close to the subject, thereby maximizing both the SNR and shimming performance3,4. However, since the DC shim loops are constrained to the RF coils, iPRES cannot effectively shim B0 inhomogeneities that change within a coil. To address this limitation, an improved design, termed iPRES(N), was proposed with N independent DC shim loops within each RF coil, thus increasing the number of magnetic fields available for local shimming5. Despite these advantages, the additional DC loops require additional power supplies, which increases cost and complexity.

A shim coil array that can contour a magnetic field to the shape of local B0 inhomogeneities by adapting the DC current path with a solid-state switch matrix and a single power supply has been proposed6. While this design can improve the B0 homogeneity, only a single current is available to produce the magnetic fields required for shimming, which limits its effectiveness when multiple amplitudes and polarities are required. Here, we propose to integrate a shim switch matrix onto an iPRES(N) coil array to reduce the number of power supplies per RF coil while maintaining the increased shimming flexibility of iPRES(N) over iPRES. As a proof-of-concept, a switch matrix is integrated onto an iPRES(2) coil driven by a single power supply to produce four unique DC paths that are used to shim local B0 inhomogeneities.

Methods

A switched iPRES(2) coil was created by using 4 solid-state bipolar junction transistors (Fig. 1). By activating different sets of transistors, four independent DC paths can be generated within the RF coil using a single DC power supply (Fig. 2). Coronal basis B0 maps were acquired in a phantom on a 3T scanner using a multi-echo gradient-echo sequence with a 1A DC current applied to each of the four DC paths.

A 3 A DC current was then applied to an RF-isolated, figure-eight perturbation loop placed near the phantom to introduce localized B0 inhomogeneities across the coil (Fig. 3A). A B0 map was acquired with the perturbation applied, but no DC current in the coil. The optimal state to use and optimal DC current to apply in the corresponding DC path to shim this perturbation were then determined by using this B0 map and the four basis B0 maps. The experiment was repeated with a 2.5 A current applied to a single RF-isolated perturbation loop (Fig. 3D) that produced different B0 inhomogeneities.

Results

Fig. 2 shows the four independent basis B0 maps available for shimming. Figs. 3B and 3E show the B0 maps corresponding to the two perturbation loops. Figs. 3C and 3F show the B0 maps after shimming with the switched iPRES(2) coil, demonstrating a significant improvement in B0 homogeneity with up to an 86% reduction in the B0 root-mean-square-error.

Discussion and Conclusion

These proof-of-concept experiments demonstrate that the switched iPRES(2) coil can adaptively shim B0 inhomogeneities of different shapes within the RF coil using a single power supply. Such results cannot be achieved with an iPRES(1) coil, which lacks the spatial resolution to shim changing B0 inhomogeneities within the RF coil, or an iPRES(2) coil, which requires an additional power supply. In general, a switched iPRES(N) coil array retains the advantage of having multiple magnetic fields available for B0 shimming within each RF coil while reducing the number of power supplies required, thereby reducing cost and complexity.

Acknowledgements

This work was in part supported by NIH grants R21 EB018951, R24 MH106048, and R01 EB012586.

References

1. Juchem C et al. MRM 2011;66:893–900. 2. Juchem C et al. JMR 2011;212:280–8. 3. Han et al. MRM 2013;70:241-7. 4. Truong TK et al. Neuroimage 2014;103:235-240. 5. Darnell D et al. Proc. ISMRM 2015;23:861. 6. Harris CT et al. MRM 2014;71:859-69.

Figures

Figure 1. Schematic of a switched iPRES(2) RF/shim coil (red: RF-isolated path, green: control lines).The transistors are labeled A-D. Different active switch combinations can generate different DC paths (see Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Schematics for each of the four switch combinations (A: state 1, B: state 2, C: state 3, D: state 4, with the DC paths shown in blue, orange, green, and magenta, respectively) and corresponding basis B0 maps.

Figure 3. A,D. Figure-eight and single perturbation loops with 3 A and 2.5 A applied, respectively, to produce localized B0 inhomogeneities within the RF coil. B,E. B0 maps corresponding to the figure-eight and single perturbation loops, respectively. C,F. B0 maps after shimming with the switched iPRES(2) coil using state 3 (Fig. 2C) and state 2 (Fig. 2B) with optimal DC currents, respectively.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
3563