Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Thresholds of a High Performance Insertable Head Gradient Coil
Trevor P Wade1,2, Andrew Alejski1, Charles A McKenzie2, and Brian K Rutt3

1Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, ON, Canada, 2Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON, Canada, 3Dept. of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States

Synopsis

A high performance insertable head gradient was evaluated for peripheral nerve stimulation and found to have PNS thresholds several times higher than body gradients and equal to or exceeding existing head gradients. The most sensitive axis (Y) had a threshold of ΔGmin = 108 ± 4 mT/m and SRmin = 156 ± 9 T/m/s. This rapidly insertable coil has the hardware capability to reach ∆Gmax of 120mT/m single axis and 400mT/m triple axis with presently available clinical gradient amplifiers, meaning extremely high hardware performance but also that PNS thresholds are reached on most axes.

Introduction

Body gradient performance is strongly limited by peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) thresholds, which is an impediment to higher performance MRI in many fields. To overcome this limitation, we have designed and built a high performance gradient with a linear region to just accommodate the human brain and upper C-spine (22cm transverse, 19cm longitudinal), capable of 120 mT/m and 1200 T/m/s using presently available 1MVA gradient drivers. This head gradient, denoted “H3”, uses a short, symmetric, folded design, compact enough to be rapidly inserted into a standard clinical scanner without removing the body gradient or RF coil[1-4]. We anticipated the restricted linear region would lead to PNS thresholds substantially higher than for body gradients[5], and possibly also previous head gradients. We present the first measured PNS thresholds for our novel high performance head gradient.

Methods

PNS thresholds were measured in volunteers (N=12) outside the main magnetic field under an IRB-approved protocol. The absence of B0 should not affect PNS, and led to quiet, minimal vibration measurements, aiding detection of subtle stimulation onset. The gradient was connected to standard amplifiers (660A, 1650V peak) and controlled using the scanner console (Discovery MR750, GE Healthcare, Waukesha WI).

Waveforms (Fig. 1) consisted of trains of trapezoidal lobes 64 pulses long with a fixed flat-top time of 1ms[5]. The peak to peak rise time (τ) was varied between 100ms and 1600ms and gradient excursion (ΔG) was initialized at a value known not to stimulate and was then slowly increased with a 2s pause between increments. When the subject reported the first definite PNS, the waveform pulsing was stopped, and the threshold (τ and ΔG) recorded. A plot of ΔG vs. τ reveals the linear PNS threshold curve described by ΔGmin and SRmin[6].

The resulting threshold data were analyzed using logistic regression[5] to extract population mean values for ΔGmin and SRmin. The physiological PNS parameters, chronaxie (τc) and rheobase (dB/dtr), were derived from these[1]. Only those rise times for which at least 25% of the population stimulated were included in the analysis[1].

Results

Stimulation thresholds for the individually-driven X and Y axes are shown in Figure 2, with the logistic mean and standard deviation indicated for each τ, as well as linear fits to these population mean values. Figure 3 indicates the oblique XY (simultaneous X and Y) axis, has higher PNS and hardware thresholds than either of the individual axes. Reference PNS thresholds and hardware limits for existing head[5,7,8] and body[5] gradient coils are shown, whenever corresponding measurements were available.

The PNS threshold parameters for all axes are summarized in Table 1. For our H3 coil, X and Y axes produced stimulations for most volunteers enabling precise estimates of ΔGmin and SRmin. PNS was felt primarily around the face for the x-axis, and around the neck, shoulders and ears for the y-axis. Two subjects reported sensations in their fingers which did not depend on hand position. The H3 Z-axis did not stimulate enough volunteers to establish PNS thresholds. For the oblique axes. ∆G values are defined as the vector magnitude[5].

Discussion

Our gradient hardware capabilities are at least 50% higher (strength and slew rate) than existing head gradients. Importantly, the PNS thresholds for our head gradient are greater than existing head gradient coils, and 3-4 times higher than existing body gradients! We attribute these major increases in PNS thresholds to the smaller linear region length (19cm) for our head gradient compared to existing head gradients (26cm for HG2[8]).

For previous head gradient coils (HN1, HG2), the x-axis had the lowest PNS threshold[5,7]. This was not the case for our H3 head gradient, for which the Y gradient had the lowest threshold (comparable to the x-axis threshold of HG2). The H3 x-axis threshold was 60% higher (ΔGmin) than the H3 Y-axis. We have not established the underlying mechanism for this “swapped” X-Y PNS threshold behaviour of H3 compared to other head gradients, but speculate that it is a result of the folded design of H3.

H3 is capable of significantly higher strengths and slew rates than have been achievable with previous head only coils; this has allowed us to measure stimulation thresholds on two out of three single axes, whereas most previous PNS studies have only been able to produce stimulation on one single axis and have had to rely on oblique axis drive to reliably measure stimulation thresholds[5,7].

Conclusions

We have characterized the PNS performance of a novel insertable head gradient coil, and found these PNS thresholds to be substantially higher than for previously characterized head and body gradient coils.

Acknowledgements

Research support from NIH P41 EB015891 and GE Healthcare. CM was supported by a Canada Research Chair (950-228038).

References

1Wade T, Alejski A, Bartha J, Tsarapkina D, Rutt BK, McKenzie CA. Design, Thermal Characterization of an All Hollow Copper Insertable Head Gradient Coil. ISMRM 2015 #1021

2Simone Winkler, Wade T, Alejski A, McKenzie CA, Rutt BK. Lorentz Damping and the Field dependence of Gradient Coil Vibroacoustics. ISMRM 2015 #1020

3Simone Winkler, Wade T, Alejski A, McKenzie CA, Rutt BK. Accurate Vibroacoustic Simulations in High Performance Gradient Coils. ISMRM 2014 #3089

4Wade T, Alejski A, Bartha J, Tsarapkina D, Hinks RS, McKinnon GC, Rutt BK, McKenzie CA. Design, Construction and Initial Evaluation of a Folded Insertable Head Gradient Coil. ISMRM 2014 #4851

5Zhang B, Yen YF, Chronik BA, McKinnon GC, Rutt BK. Peripheral nerve stimulation properties of head and body gradient coils of various sizes. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:50-58.

6Chronik BA, Rutt BK. Simple linear formulation for magnetostimulation specific to MRI gradient coils. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2001;45:916–919.

7Lee SK, Mathieu JB, Piel JE, Hardy CJ, Schenck J, Tan ET, Budesheim E, Fiveland E, Park K, Rohling K, Hua Y, Lin J, Bernstein M, Huston III J, Shu Y, Foo T. Brain imaging with a Dedicated Asymmetric Head-only Gradient Coil without Peripheral Nerve Stimulation at 500 T/m/s. ISMRM 2014 #310

8Mathieu JB, Lee SK, Graziani D, Lin J, Budesheim E, Piel JE, Thiagarajan N, Hardy CJ, Schenck J, Tan ET, Fiveland E, Park K, Hua Y, Bernstein M, Huston III J, Shu Y, Foo T. Development of a Dedicated Asymmetric Head-Only Gradient Coil for High-Performance Brain Imaging with a High PNS Threshold. ISMRM 2015 #1019

Figures

Fig.1: Gradient waveform used for PNS experiments, indicating 3 out of the 64 lobes with fixed flat top duration and with rise times, τ, and switching amplitude, ΔG (vector magnitude for oblique axes) varied in a fixed TR.

Fig.2: Squares indicate the logistic regression mean and standard deviation for X (H3x) and Y (H3y) axes of our head gradient. Solid lines indicate the fit ΔGmin and SRmin. Other head coil X axis[7,8] (HG2x), and body coil Y axis[5] (BRMy) thresholds are also shown. Dashed lines indicate hardware limits.


Fig.3 The PNS threshold of the oblique XY axis of our prototype coil (H3xy) is compared to the equivalent oblique axis of another head and neck coil[5] (HN1xy) and body[5] coil (BRMxy). Respective hardware limits are indicated with dashed lines.

Table1: Stimulation thresholds expressed as linear (ΔGmin, SRmin) as well as hyperbolic (τc, dB/dtr) model parameters. dB/dtr is calculated at r=11cm, assuming gradients are linear to 11cm. Total number of subjects stimulated on each axis as well as the number of subjects reporting stimulations on each axis are also shown.




Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
3552