Manushka V. Vaidya1,2,3, Gillian G. Haemer1,2,3, Christopher M. Collins1,2,3, Gang Chen1,2,3, Giuseppe Carluccio1,2, Mary Bruno1,2, Graham C. Wiggins1,2, Daniel K. Sodickson1,2,3, and Riccardo Lattanzi1,2,3
1Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States, 2Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States, 3Sackler Institute of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
Synopsis
A standard head-coil may not be sufficient to
examine regions inferior to the base of the skull. Previous work demonstrates
that the field-of-view of a surface coil can be extended using high
permittivity materials (HPM). In this work, we use calcium titanate bags to
extend the sensitivity of a commercial head-coil, and demonstrate an increase
in the signal-to-noise ratio in the neck muscles, brainstem and superior
regions of the spinal cord and cervical vertebrae. Our results indicate that
extending the sensitivity of any commercial coil may be possible using
appropriately positioned HPMs. INTRODUCTION
Magnetic
resonance (MR) imaging is a valuable tool to examine lesions (e.g. lymph node
lesions) and visualize anatomical structures (e.g. brainstem and cervical
vertebrae) in the head and neck
1. While
a standard head coil is sufficient for visualizing anatomical regions above the
base of the skull, inferior regions require a separate neck coil
1. Water
bags in a head coil were previously used to improve the transmit field (|B1+|
) for pulsed Arterial Spin Labeling
2. Additionally,
high permittivity materials (HPM) can be used to extend the field of view (FOV)
of a surface coil
3. This
work aims to extend the FOV of a commercial head coil into the neck using strategically
placed HPM bags.
METHODS
Simulations: Numerical simulations were
carried out to determine whether the HPM pads should be constructed from powder/water
slurries using Barium titanate (BaTiO3, εr = 298, σ = 0.39 S/m) or
Calcium titanate (CaTiO3, εr = 110, σ = 0.08 S/m)4,5. A 4-port head sized
quadrature-driven birdcage coil, similar to the experimental transmit head coil
(Nova Medical, Wilmington, MA), was modeled using Microwave Studio (CST 2015,Germany),
and loaded with a human model (Duke). Each port was tuned and matched at 297.2
MHz in the absence of HPMs (S-parameters, Fig. 1). Two HPM pads (~12x14x2cm3) constructed
from sections of spherical and cylindrical shells were positioned at the base
of the skull to extend from the posterior of the ears around the back of the
head and neck on both sides, and extending 7cm outside the coil (Fig 1). The
birdcage coil was not re-tuned and matched after placing HPM pads in simulation,
as re-tuning and matching the commercial coil was not possible. S-parameters
did not significantly change in the presence of HPMs (Fig 1). An accuracy of -30
dB was used to ensure convergence, and 5-8 million mesh cells were used with
same global and local mesh settings for all cases. Transmit efficiency (|B1+|/sqrt(dissipated
power)) was evaluated for three cases: 1) No HPM, 2) BaTiO3 pads,
and 3) CaTiO3 pads.
Experiments: Simulation results suggested that CaTiO3 pads
improved FOV and transmit efficiency, so HPM pads were constructed from CaTiO3
powder (Alfa Aesar, 99 %+, -325 mesh powder) and deuterium oxide (Sigma
Aldrich, 99% atom %D). The saturated slurry was measured (85070E Dielectric Probe Kit,
Agilent Technologies), and heat-sealed between plastic
sheets to create two pads: 12x14x2cm3 and 11x14x2cm3 (εr
= 110, σ = 0.08 S/m). A healthy
volunteer was scanned on a Siemens whole-body 7T scanner (MAGNETOM, Erlangen,
Germany) using a one channel transmit, 24 channel receive head coil (Nova
Medical, Wilmington, MA). A transmit reference voltage (to achieve 90o
flip angle in the center with a 500 μs hard pulse) of 295 V was used for all cases. Flip
angle maps (TR/TE = 5.000/2.42 ms, BW = 650 Hz/pixel, FOV = 285x285 mm2,
matrix size = 128x128) were obtained
used a turbo-FLASH based technique (6). SNR was
calculated using the Kellman method from the raw data (7), obtained using a GRE sequence (TR/TE = 200/4.1 ms, nominal FA = 20°, BW = 300 Hz/pixel, FOV = 285x285
mm2, matrix size = 256x256). In
order to assess image quality, T1-weighted MPRAGE (TR/TE = 2.250/3.48 ms,
nominal FA = 9o, BW =200 Hz/pixel, FOV = 256x216x158 mm3,
matrix size = 348x348x144) images were also acquired. In-vivo sagittal and
coronal slices through the brainstem were obtained for each case. All studies involving human subjects were performed
in accordance with the institution’s IRB.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The
simulation and experimental data demonstrate that extending the FOV of a head coil
and improving the SNR in the neck is feasible using HPM pads. All experiments
were carried out using HPM pads containing CaTiO
3. Experimental
results show that HPM improved the SNR in the neck, especially the brainstem
and neck muscles with percentage improvement ranging from 45% (spinal cord) to
478% (muscle) (Fig 3). Frontal and superior regions of the brain showed SNR
loss with the HPM pads (Fig 3). However, as SNR is generally very high in those
regions due to coil proximity, we anticipate that this decrease will not affect
image quality.T1-weighted MPRAGE images showed improved quality in the
posterior of the neck, especially in the muscles, brainstem, and the superior
spinal cord and cervical vertebrae.
CONCLUSION
HPM pads positioned in a head
coil are an inexpensive method for extending SNR further into the brainstem and
spinal cord, and this method may be applied to other existing commercial coils.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Center for
Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (www.cai2r.net),
a NIBIB Biomedical Technology Resource Center (NIH P41 EB017183). References
1. Wippold FJ. Head and
neck imaging: The role of CT and MRI. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
2007;25(3):453-465.
2.Teeuwisse
WM, Collins CM, Wang C, Yang Q, Ma W, Smith N, van Osch M, Webb A. Improvement
in high field pulsed arterial spin labeling using dielectric pads: a simulation
and experimental study. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 2010;p.3863.
3. Vaidya
MV, Sodickson DK, Collins CM, Lattanzi R. Extending the sensitivity of a
transmit/recieve radiofrequency coil with dielectric materials at 7 T. Proc
Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 2015; p.0406.
4. Haines
K, Smith NB, Webb AG. New high dielectric constant materials for tailoring the
distribution at high magnetic fields. Journal of magnetic resonance
2010;203(2):323-327.
5.Luo
W, Lanagan MT, Sica CT, Ryu Y, Oh S, Ketterman M, Yang QX, Collins CM.
Permittivity and performance of dielectric pads with sintered ceramic beads in
MRI: early experiments and simulations at 3 T. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
2013;70(1):269-275.
6. Klose
U. Mapping of the radio frequency magnetic field with a MR snapshot FLASH
technique. Medical Physics 1992;19(4):1099-1104.
7. Kellman
P, McVeigh ER. Image reconstruction in SNR units: A general method for SNR
measurement†. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2005;54(6):1439-1447.