Tijl van der Velden1, Quincy van Houtum1, Mark W.J.M. Gosselink1, Peter R Luijten1, Vincent O Boer2, and Dennis W.J. Klomp1
1Radiology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 2Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
Synopsis
In this work a gradient
insert coil for breast MRI has been constructed. Its behaviour inside a 7T whole
body MR system was characterized using magnetic field cameras. Furthermore, the
possibility to correct eddy currents from the gradient insert coil using the
built-in gradient set has been investigated.Introduction
Local gradient coils have the advantage to
be highly efficient; maximum gradient strengths and slew rates are typically much
higher compared the built-in whole-body gradient coils. Sites that employ
insert gradients usually disable the regular gradient system by disconnecting
the built-in gradient from the amplifiers. An alternative approach is to leave
the standard gradient system as-is, and treat the insert gradient as an
additional gradient axis1. This way, the regular gradient system can
compensate any eddy currents (ECs) from the gradient insert induced in
conducting parts of the system. Consequently, active shielding of the gradient
insert is not required anymore, making the gradient design much more versatile.
This can result in smaller, lighter and more efficient gradient inserts.
In this feasibility study we demonstrate
the design of a high power Z-gradient insert for the human breast at 7T and investigate
if a body gradient coil can compensate the ECs of this asymmetric gradient
insert coil, connected to a fourth gradient amplifier.
Methods
A breast gradient coil producing a linear
field in the z-direction was designed with an efficiency of 1mT*m-1*A-1
and constructed from hollow copper wire. The coil was placed in a 7 tesla whole
body MR system (Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, OH). Via a force compensated
power cable, the coil was connected to an additional gradient amplifier (Copley
Controls, Canton, MA). A dynamic shimming unit (Resonance Research, Inc.,
Billerica, MA) was connected to the amplifier to create trapezoidal waveforms.
Field characterization was done using a stand-alone field camera system (skope
magnetic resonance technologies, Zürich, CH). See figure 1 for overall setup.
Eight field probes were positioned such
that five different field components could be distinguished: a B0
offset, the X, Y and Z gradients of the system, as well as the Z gradient generated
by the gradient insert.
After switching the current going through
the gradient insert coil, short and long term ECs were measured with field
cameras. Short ECs were measured for 2ms with a resolution of 1μs,
and long term ECs were measured for 5s with a resolution of 100ms.
A B0 map of a spherical phantom
was acquired with a 0.01% drive of the gradient amplifier (constant field of
0.1mT/m) to the insert gradient. To assess force behavior of the insert, the
gradient was driven with 10ms pulses at 50% drive (300mT/m). Heating of the
gradient coil was assessed by placing a temperature probe in a small hole in
the casing of the coil, near the conductor.
The heating was assessed with and
without active cooling, with a constant field of 30mT/m and subsequently 60mT/m
generated by the coil for approximately 7 minutes. Active cooling was achieved
by pumping glycol through the copper wire, which in its turn was cooled in a
heat exchanger (Thermo Electron Corporation).
Results
Figure 2 shows a B0 map reflecting
the efficiency of the coil of 1mT*m-1*A-1. When driven at
50% of the gradient amplifier drive, 300mT/m was realized. As the coil is force
compensated, the coil was driven at high power reproducibly in the field of 7T.
Figure 3 shows the short term ECs (<2ms).
These ECs are the self-term and a B0 offset, while the other terms
(x, y, z) are negligible.
Figure 4 shows the long term ECs. In
contrast to the short term ECs, the long term ECs are a Z gradient EC and a B0
offset, while the ECs of the insert gradient are absent.
Figure 5 shows the heating curves of the
gradient coil with and without active cooling. With active cooling, the
temperature of the gradient coil could easily be controlled within safety
guidelines.
Discussion
The non-shielded gradient insert could
easily provide a high field of 300mT/m driven with only 50% of the amplifiers
performance. Using the hollow conductors, temperature was managed to remain
within patient acceptable values.
Excellent characterization of the
spatiotemporal field patterns was achieved with the field cameras.
The short term ECs of the non-shielded
gradient insert are in the order of 2ms, which can easily be compensated with
pre-emphasis. The long term ECs, most probable from the magnet cryostat, are predominantly
reflected as a Z gradient field. The built-in (Z-)gradient coils can compensate
this, and therefore the EC can be treated as a cross term for the insert
gradient coil.
Conclusion
An efficient high power gradient insert coil
has been constructed without intrinsic shielding. Using the in bore gradient
setup, long term ECs can be compensated facilitating versatile gradient designs
(i.e. reduced spaced requirements, light weight and high efficiency).
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Composite
(Dual) Gradient. Parker et al. Conc. In MR Part B, 2009