Synopsis
Two
sets of dielectric pads with high permittivity (CaTiO3: 110 and
BaTiO3: 286) were evaluated for potential improvements in imaging the shoulder
joint and upper arm in combination with an 8–channel transmit/receive shoulder
coil at 7 Tesla. In vivo images with structural PD TSE and DREAM flip angle
maps were obtained and compared to measurements without pads present. Both a
fixed RF shim as well as individual RF shimming were applied. For the
investigated configurations, no substantial improvements in imaging upper
extremities at 7 Tesla were found when applying high permittivity dielectric
pads.Purpose
It
has been shown for selected applications at 7T that high permittivity
dielectric bags can improve transmit B
1+ fields. Improvements have been
reported for imaging the cerebellum
1, inner ear
2, and the
temporomandibular joint
3, i.e. relative small regions of interest, and all
in conjunction with a commonly-used close-fitting 1-channel transmit/32-channel receive head
coil (Nova Medical, Wilmington, MA). While reports can also be found for larger
cross-sections at 3 Tesla (cardiac
4, thighs
5), only one study evaluated
the use of high permittivity materials for whole brain imaging at 7T
6. The
aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the effects of different
configurations of dielectric pads in imaging upper extremities, especially the
shoulder joint, at 7T.
Methods
Three healthy
male volunteers (BMI: 22/23/26 kg/m2) were included in this study.
All subjects were imaged at their right shoulder using a whole-body research system (Magnetom 7T, Siemens
Healthcare GmbH, Germany) and an in-house-developed 8-channel transmit/receive shoulder coil
(Figure 1). The subjects were imaged in three consecutive scans: without
dielectric pads present, using 3 pads made of calcium titanate (CaTiO3;
175x110x10 mm3, permittivity 110, conductivity 0.11 S/m), and using
3 pads made of barium titanate (BaTiO3; 175x120x10 mm3, permittivity
286, conductivity 0.44 S/m). The pads were placed around the joint as
illustrated in Figure 1. Additionally, one subject was imaged at the upper arm
with only two pads: one between arm and trunk and one placed on top (Figure 3).
For each configuration a set of measurements was performed: (1) transversal flip
angle maps were obtained with the DREAM technique 7, and structural imaging
with a PD-weighted turbo-spin echo (TSE) sequence (2) in sagittal orientation,
and (3) in transversal orientation including fat saturation. Each measurement
was obtained twice, (i) with a fixed RF shim, and (ii) using individual RF phase
shimming per subject and pad configuration. TSE images were chosen, as they are
clinically relevant and more sensitive to B1+ variations than gradient echo
images.
Images were
evaluated qualitatively by a physicist and a radiologist in consensus regarding
overall image quality, homogeneity, and presence of artifacts. Quantitatively,
we compared mean flip angle and standard deviations over a large region of
interest (ROI) between each configuration, as well as differences in contrast
ratios between adjacent tissues in the fat-saturated PD TSE images.
Results
In the
qualitative image evaluation no benefit in using dielectric pads was observed.
On the contrary, despite individual RF shimming, images appeared more
inhomogeneous with very bright regions in the periphery, especially in
subcutaneous tissue and the humerus, and low signal in deeper regions within
the body. Images appeared more inhomogeneous when using the BaTiO3 pads
compared to the CaTiO3 pads or without pads (Figures 1-3). The CaTiO3
pads yielded marginal improvements compared to the situation without pads, with
only minimal benefits in depicting the coracobrachialis muscle in one subject, for example (Figure
2). However, no benefits were found for
the overall shoulder joint.
Similar results were obtained quantitatively.
Although BaTiO3 pads increased the mean flip angle by 5 to even 40%
when a fixed standard RF shim was applied, almost no differences in mean flip
angle and standard deviation were measured after individual RF phase shimming (Figure
4). Also, no differences in contrast ratios were observed when dielectric pads
were used (Figure 5).
Discussion and conclusion
For the
investigated configurations, no substantial improvements in imaging the upper
extremities at 7T were found from applying high permittivity dielectric pads. This
is in line with previous work in neuroimaging at 7T, where a degredation of the
transmit uniformity was also shown for increasing permittivity, suggesting an
optimum permittivity around ~150. Electrically large pads are known to
potentially introduce strong
wavelength effects in the B
1+ field
2,8, which
was reflected in the structural images when moving to BaTiO
3 pads. Please note, the transmit B
1+ field was already rather homogeneous
without pads. With these pads, a strong increase in B
1+ may be appreciated locally,
and especially superficially, which could be of interest in selected
applications such as depicting tears of the supraspinatus tendon. The CaTiO
3
pads with lower permittivity did not introduce such strong wavelength effects, however
the obtained signal improvements were only marginal and did not justify their
application for further studies. The RF coil certainly plays an important role in
this comparison, although similar results have been presented in simulation
studies for a circular loop array
10. The results obtained may however not
reflect general performance of dielectric pads when other designs for shoulder
or body RF transceive arrays are used.
Acknowledgements
The research leading to these results has received funding from the
European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework
Programme (FP/2007-2013) / ERC Grant Agreement number 291903 MRexcite, and from
the Interne Forschungsförderung Essen (IFORES), University Hospital Essen, University
Duisburg-Essen.References
[1] Teeuwisse
WM, Brink WM, Webb AG. Quantitative assessment of the effects of
high-permittivity pads in 7T MRI of the brain. Magn Reson Med.
2012 May;67(5):1285-93.
[2] Brink
WM, van der Jagt AM, et al. High permittivity dielectric pads improve high
spatial resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the inner ear at 7 T. Invest Radiol. 2014 May;49(5):271-7.
[3] Manoliu
A, Spinner G, et al. MR imaging of the temporomandibular joint at 7.0 Tesla.
Proceedings ISMRM 2015, # 3143.
[4] Brink
WM, Webb AG. High permittivity pads reduce specific absorption rate, improve B1
homogeneity, and increase contrast-to-noise ratio for functional cardiac MRI at
3 T. Magn Reson Med. 2014 Apr;71(4):1632-40.
[5] Brink
WM, Versluis MJ, et al. Considerations for parallel imaging when using high
permittivity pads in the thighs at 3 T. Proceedings ISMRM 2015, # 2426
[6]
Teeuwisse WM, Brink WM, Webb AG. Simulations of high permittivity materials for
7 T neuroimaging and evaluation of a new barium titanate-based dielectric. Magn Reson Med. 2012 Apr;67(4):912-8.
[7] Nehrke
K, Börnert P. DREAM--a novel approach for robust, ultrafast, multislice B1
mapping. Magn Reson Med. 2012 Nov;68(5):1517-26.
[8] Bitz AK,
Kraff O, et al. RF
safety evaluation of different configurations of high-permittivity pads used to
improve imaging of the cerebellum at 7T. Proceedings ISMRM 2014, # 4892.
[9] Brink
WM, Remis RF, Webb AG. A theoretical approach based on electromagnetic
scattering for analysing dielectric shimming in high-field MRI. Magn Reson Med.
2015, doi: 10.1002/mrm.25783.
[10] Kozlov
M, Turner, R. Influence of a Dielectric Insert of High Permittivity on the Transmit
Performance of a 300MHz Multi-channel MRI Loop Array. PIERS Online 2011; 7(5):436-40.