Evaluation of potential improvements from high permittivity pads for imaging upper extremities at 7 Tesla
Oliver Kraff1, Andrea Lazik-Palm1,2, Wyger M Brink3, Andreas K Bitz4, Mark E Ladd4, and Harald H Quick1,5

1Erwin L. Hahn Institute for MRI, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany, 2Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital, Essen, Germany, 3Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 4Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, 5High Field and Hybrid MR Imaging, University Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital, Essen, Germany

Synopsis

Two sets of dielectric pads with high permittivity (CaTiO3: 110 and BaTiO3: 286) were evaluated for potential improvements in imaging the shoulder joint and upper arm in combination with an 8–channel transmit/receive shoulder coil at 7 Tesla. In vivo images with structural PD TSE and DREAM flip angle maps were obtained and compared to measurements without pads present. Both a fixed RF shim as well as individual RF shimming were applied. For the investigated configurations, no substantial improvements in imaging upper extremities at 7 Tesla were found when applying high permittivity dielectric pads.

Purpose

It has been shown for selected applications at 7T that high permittivity dielectric bags can improve transmit B1+ fields. Improvements have been reported for imaging the cerebellum 1, inner ear 2, and the temporomandibular joint 3, i.e. relative small regions of interest, and all in conjunction with a commonly-used close-fitting 1-channel transmit/32-channel receive head coil (Nova Medical, Wilmington, MA). While reports can also be found for larger cross-sections at 3 Tesla (cardiac 4, thighs 5), only one study evaluated the use of high permittivity materials for whole brain imaging at 7T 6. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the effects of different configurations of dielectric pads in imaging upper extremities, especially the shoulder joint, at 7T.

Methods

Three healthy male volunteers (BMI: 22/23/26 kg/m2) were included in this study. All subjects were imaged at their right shoulder using a whole-body research system (Magnetom 7T, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Germany) and an in-house-developed 8-channel transmit/receive shoulder coil (Figure 1). The subjects were imaged in three consecutive scans: without dielectric pads present, using 3 pads made of calcium titanate (CaTiO3; 175x110x10 mm3, permittivity 110, conductivity 0.11 S/m), and using 3 pads made of barium titanate (BaTiO3; 175x120x10 mm3, permittivity 286, conductivity 0.44 S/m). The pads were placed around the joint as illustrated in Figure 1. Additionally, one subject was imaged at the upper arm with only two pads: one between arm and trunk and one placed on top (Figure 3). For each configuration a set of measurements was performed: (1) transversal flip angle maps were obtained with the DREAM technique 7, and structural imaging with a PD-weighted turbo-spin echo (TSE) sequence (2) in sagittal orientation, and (3) in transversal orientation including fat saturation. Each measurement was obtained twice, (i) with a fixed RF shim, and (ii) using individual RF phase shimming per subject and pad configuration. TSE images were chosen, as they are clinically relevant and more sensitive to B1+ variations than gradient echo images.

Images were evaluated qualitatively by a physicist and a radiologist in consensus regarding overall image quality, homogeneity, and presence of artifacts. Quantitatively, we compared mean flip angle and standard deviations over a large region of interest (ROI) between each configuration, as well as differences in contrast ratios between adjacent tissues in the fat-saturated PD TSE images.

Results

In the qualitative image evaluation no benefit in using dielectric pads was observed. On the contrary, despite individual RF shimming, images appeared more inhomogeneous with very bright regions in the periphery, especially in subcutaneous tissue and the humerus, and low signal in deeper regions within the body. Images appeared more inhomogeneous when using the BaTiO3 pads compared to the CaTiO3 pads or without pads (Figures 1-3). The CaTiO3 pads yielded marginal improvements compared to the situation without pads, with only minimal benefits in depicting the coracobrachialis muscle in one subject, for example (Figure 2). However, no benefits were found for the overall shoulder joint.

Similar results were obtained quantitatively. Although BaTiO3 pads increased the mean flip angle by 5 to even 40% when a fixed standard RF shim was applied, almost no differences in mean flip angle and standard deviation were measured after individual RF phase shimming (Figure 4). Also, no differences in contrast ratios were observed when dielectric pads were used (Figure 5).

Discussion and conclusion

For the investigated configurations, no substantial improvements in imaging the upper extremities at 7T were found from applying high permittivity dielectric pads. This is in line with previous work in neuroimaging at 7T, where a degredation of the transmit uniformity was also shown for increasing permittivity, suggesting an optimum permittivity around ~150. Electrically large pads are known to potentially introduce strong wavelength effects in the B1+ field 2,8, which was reflected in the structural images when moving to BaTiO3 pads. Please note, the transmit B1+ field was already rather homogeneous without pads. With these pads, a strong increase in B1+ may be appreciated locally, and especially superficially, which could be of interest in selected applications such as depicting tears of the supraspinatus tendon. The CaTiO3 pads with lower permittivity did not introduce such strong wavelength effects, however the obtained signal improvements were only marginal and did not justify their application for further studies. The RF coil certainly plays an important role in this comparison, although similar results have been presented in simulation studies for a circular loop array 10. The results obtained may however not reflect general performance of dielectric pads when other designs for shoulder or body RF transceive arrays are used.

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013) / ERC Grant Agreement number 291903 MRexcite, and from the Interne Forschungsförderung Essen (IFORES), University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen.

References

[1] Teeuwisse WM, Brink WM, Webb AG. Quantitative assessment of the effects of high-permittivity pads in 7T MRI of the brain. Magn Reson Med. 2012 May;67(5):1285-93.

[2] Brink WM, van der Jagt AM, et al. High permittivity dielectric pads improve high spatial resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the inner ear at 7 T. Invest Radiol. 2014 May;49(5):271-7.

[3] Manoliu A, Spinner G, et al. MR imaging of the temporomandibular joint at 7.0 Tesla. Proceedings ISMRM 2015, # 3143.

[4] Brink WM, Webb AG. High permittivity pads reduce specific absorption rate, improve B1 homogeneity, and increase contrast-to-noise ratio for functional cardiac MRI at 3 T. Magn Reson Med. 2014 Apr;71(4):1632-40.

[5] Brink WM, Versluis MJ, et al. Considerations for parallel imaging when using high permittivity pads in the thighs at 3 T. Proceedings ISMRM 2015, # 2426

[6] Teeuwisse WM, Brink WM, Webb AG. Simulations of high permittivity materials for 7 T neuroimaging and evaluation of a new barium titanate-based dielectric. Magn Reson Med. 2012 Apr;67(4):912-8.

[7] Nehrke K, Börnert P. DREAM--a novel approach for robust, ultrafast, multislice B1 mapping. Magn Reson Med. 2012 Nov;68(5):1517-26.

[8] Bitz AK, Kraff O, et al. RF safety evaluation of different configurations of high-permittivity pads used to improve imaging of the cerebellum at 7T. Proceedings ISMRM 2014, # 4892.

[9] Brink WM, Remis RF, Webb AG. A theoretical approach based on electromagnetic scattering for analysing dielectric shimming in high-field MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2015, doi: 10.1002/mrm.25783.

[10] Kozlov M, Turner, R. Influence of a Dielectric Insert of High Permittivity on the Transmit Performance of a 300MHz Multi-channel MRI Loop Array. PIERS Online 2011; 7(5):436-40.

Figures

Figure 1: Image of the shoulder coil (left). Top row shows images with fat saturation with all three pad configurations after individual RF shimming (subject 1). Placement of pads is given in the images, while the ROI for evaluating the FA maps (bottom row) is marked in the left image.

Figure 2: Examples of PD TSE images with and without fat saturation in transversal and sagittal orientation for all three pad configurations and individual RF shimming (subject 2). Note the slight improvement in depicting the coracobrachialis muscle with CaTiO3 pads (green star), while BaTiO3 introduces stronger B1+ asymmetries (red star).

Figure 3: Application of dielectric pads for imaging more distal structures like the upper arm. Here, only two pads were used as marked in the images (yellow bars). The application of pads yielded no improvements either in image quality (PD fs) or in the DREAM flip angle maps.

Figure 4: Measured flip angles achieved when applying a standard RF shim (first column) and after individual RF shimming (second column).

Figure 5: Effect of different dielectric pad configurations on contrast ratios measured in PD fat sat TSE images in the shoulder joint (left two) and upper arm (right two).



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
3542