Zhiyong Zhai1 and Michael Morich1
1Philips, Cleveland, OH, United States
Synopsis
At 7T, T/R loop
coils have challenges in transmit B1+-field efficiency and
receive B1--field sensitivity in a spatial context, due
to the increased tissue dielectric/wavelength effect. Here we propose a revised T/R
loop coil schema which improves the B1-field non-uniformity at 7T.
The proposed modification may make the T/R loop coil construct yet more useful
at ultra-high fields.Introduction
Transmit/Receive (T/R) loop coils are used at multiple
field strengths for imaging and spectroscopy applications. At 7T, T/R loop
coils have challenges in transmit |B
1+|-field efficiency and
receive |B
1-|-field sensitivity in a spatial context, due
to the increased tissue dielectric/wavelength effect. This presents an
opportunity for improvement in their usage at 7T. Here we propose a revised T/R
loop coil schema which improves the B
1-field non-uniformity at 7T.
The proposed modification may make the T/R loop coil construct yet more useful
at ultra-high fields.
Methods
Figure 1(a) shows a coil model (XFDTD software package, Remcom, Inc.,
State College, PA) [1, 2] of a conventional T/R loop coil with a circular
shape. The loop coil is modeled as a conducting strip with a diameter of 14cm
and strip width of ~ 1.3 cm. The loop coil is shielded by a 20cm-diameter
circular conducting plate which is gaped ~2.5 cm from the loop conductor.
Eight lumped capacitors are equally distributed along the loop conductor to
tune the coil to the uniform current distribution mode at 298MHz (
1H
at 7T). Figure 1(b) shows the revised T/R loop coil model which has a base structure
as per convention. However, two additional straight conductors are connected across
the loop, offset from loop center. The distance from each straight conductor center
to loop center is 4cm. The straight conductors are parallel to each other and to
the main magnet B
0 direction when in use. There is an RF switch in
each straight conductor. The revised loop coil is tuned to the resonant mode at
298MHz where current flows in the same direction along the circular conductor
path, as shown in the circuit diagram of Figure 1(c). The circular conductor
plane is substantially parallel to a plane containing the B
0
direction. To compare the transmit |B
1+|-field
and receive |B
1-|-field distributions of the conventional
and revised T/R loop coils, a uniform cylindrical phantom with material
properties set to average values of select human tissue is modeled (conductivity
of 0.694S/m, relative permittivity of 80 and mass density 1000kg/m3).
The phantom has a diameter of 16cm and height (length) of 10cm. The loop coil
models are placed 1cm above the flat surface of the phantom model as shown in
Figure 2(a). For the revised T/R loop coil, the two RF switches are simulated
as resistors placed in the middle of straight conductors, as marked S1 and S2
in Figure 2(a). During the transmit phase, S1 is set to 1000W to simulate a switch-off state, while S2 is set to 0.5W to simulate a switch-on state. During the receive
phase, S1 is set to 0.5W to simulate a switch-on state, while S2 is set to 1000W to simulate a switch-off state. Transmit |B
1+|-field
and receive |B
1-|-field are then calculated from formulas
in reference [3]. A region of interest (RoI) in the center slice of the phantom
is defined as shown in Figure 2(b), where average transmit and receive B
1-field
over the marked semi-circle-area is calculated for comparison.
Results
Figure 3 shows the normalized plots of transmit |B1+|-field
(|B1+|/|B1+|avg) and
receive |B1-|-field (|B1-|/|B1-|avg)
over the RoI in center slice of the phantom for the conventional and revised
T/R loop, respectively, where |B1+|avg and |B1-|avg
is the average B1-field over the area of RoI. As seen, for the conventional
loop coil, the spatial non-uniformity of B1-field within RoI is noteworthy
for both transmit |B1+| and receive |B1-|.
As also seen, the transmit |B1+|
and receive |B1-| is improved for the revised T/R loop
coil. The combination of transmit |B1+|
uniformity and receive |B1-| sensitivity plays a role in
performance. The revised T/R loop coil appears
to have a better use-volume at 7T than a conventional loop coil. Table 1 lists the B1-field
quantitative comparison of these two T/R loop coils. For transmit |B1+|,
the values are scaled to absorbed average power Pabs of 1W. For
receive |B1-|, the values are scaled to current amplitude
of 1A in loop conductor near the RF drive source. Normalized standard deviation
(standard deviation divided by mean value, no unit) and the dynamic ratios of |B1+|max/|B1+|min
and |B1-|max/|B1-|min
are also calculated. As seen, the revised T/R loop coil has higher transmit
efficiency (+17%), more uniform transmit |B1+|-field
(standard deviation -36%, dynamic ratio -44%) and better receive sensitivity
(+15%).
Conclusion
Here we propose a revised T/R loop coil for 7T. As simulation results
show, the revised T/R loop coil is improved across-the-board compared with a
similar sized conventional T/R loop coil. In practice, the distance between the
added straight conductors to the center of the loop coil can be adjusted for optimization
toward specific aim. Here we use a circular loop coil as an example. The same
concept is also applicable for other loop shapes such as rectangular or oval.
It is also possible to make transmit/receive array coils by using multiple
revised loops for multi-channel applications at ultra-high fields.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] C. M. Collins, et. al, MRM 40:847-856 (1998).
[2] T. S. Ibrahim, et. al, Magn. Reson. Imag. 18: 835-843 (2000)
[3]
D. I. Hoult, Concepts Magn. Reson.
12 (4): 173-187 (2000).