Xinqiang Yan1,2 and Xiaoliang Zhang3
1Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States, 2Radiology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States, 3Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
Synopsis
Traveling wave MR is a promising method for
large field-of-view imaging at ultrahigh fields. However, a major
issue currently faced in traveling wave MR is low transmit efficiency and limited
SNR. It was found that the SNR in traveling wave MRI can
be significantly improved by using a free local resonator. In
this study, we validated this finding in simulation and extended the single loop to a multi-channel array. Based on the simulation results, the SNR on the
phantom has a 16-fold gain (56.8 VS 3.6) at near area and 3-fold gain at far
area (9.7 VS 3.5) with the help of the free loop. This improvement can be attributed to the
secondary magnetic field caused by induced current of the free resonator.Introduction
Traveling
wave MR [1] is a promising method for large field-of-view imaging at ultrahigh
fields, which uses relatively small and simple RF transmit/receive devices
(or antennas). Due to the far distance between the antenna and
imaging subjects, however, a major issue currently faced in traveling wave MR is
low transmit efficiency and limited signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In previous work [2], it was found
that the SNR in traveling wave MRI can be significantly improved by using a free
resonator positioned close to the imaging sample. It is worth noting that the free
resonator has no physical connection
with transmit path or receive path, which is different from the local receive-only
array [3]. In this study, we aim to validate this finding
in simulation. Besides the receive performance, we also comparatively evaluate
the transmit performance (transmit efficiency and E fields).
Theory and Method
The free loop can be seen as an
inductively coupled resonator, of which the induced current forms a secondary
magnetic field. Therefore the total magnetic field H can be expressed as: H=H0+H’,
where H0 is the original magnetic field of traveling-wave
antenna and H’ is the secondary magnetic field of the free loop, as shown
in Fig. 1.
Numerical studies were performed
by using a full-wave FEM-based simulator (ANSYS HFSS,
Canonsburg, PA, USA). A cylindrical copper
shield was used as the waveguide (O.D. 63 cm and length 160 cm). A patch
antenna was placed at one end of the bore as RF source. It was used as a
transmitter/receiver, and was matched to 50 ohm and tuned to 298 MHz, the
Larmor frequency at 7T. A cylindrical water phantom (length 10 cm, diameter
5 cm, σ=0.59 S/m and εr=78) was placed ~80 cm away from the patch antenna, i.e., at the center of the
bore. A free loop (dimension 3.8 cm Χ 5 cm) with 4 distributed capacitors was placed about
1 cm above the phantom. Values of all capacitors were obtained by a RF and 3-D co-simulation
method [4]. As a comparison, we also simulated the traditional travelling wave
without using free resonators.
Results
Fig. 2A shows the H-field vector
in the MRI bore. It is clear that the magnetic flux goes through the loop and
induces obvious current along the loop conductors. The local B1 field (both B1+
and B1-) showed a 20-fold increase when the free loop was used (Fig. 2B). Since the loop was placed quite close to the sample, the total magnetic
field H was dominated by H’, which can also been seen from B1
pattern.
Figs. 2C and 2D show the E-field and B1+/E distributions.
Although the E-field is increased at some areas when using free resonator, the
ratio of B1+ field to E-field is still increased obviously.
Fig. 2E shows the normalized SNR on
the phantom (central transverse slice), with averaged SNRs in dotted-line
squares marked in red or white colors. The SNR was calculated by: signal/noise [5],
where signal equals to $$sin(V|B_1^+|\gamma\tau)|B_1^-|^*$$ and noise equals to $$\sqrt{\int_{volume}\sigma|E|^{2}dv}$$.
With the help of the free loop, SNR on the phantom has a 16-fold gain (56.8 VS 3.6)
at near area and 3-fold gain at far area (9.7 VS 3.5). This result is also
consistent with previous MR imaging experimental results [2].
Based on the present analysis, the single free
resonator can be extended to a multi-channel array or birdcage coil as long as
the induced current exists. To validate this assumption, we simulated a simple 2-channel
loop array in traveling wave. Fig. 3 shows the simulation results of H-field vector, B
1 field and E-filed of
the 2-channel array.
Discussions and Conclusion
The
simulation results show that SNR and transmit efficiency in traveling wave can
be well improved by using free local resonators. This improvement can be
attributed to the secondary magnetic field caused by induced
current of the free resonator. For simplicity, we
only use a linearly polarized patch antenna in present analysis. In this case, the
free loop should be positioned to ensure the magnetic flux goes thought it. It is
also noted that the transmission efficiency and SNR were improved with a
significant compromising of B
1 homogeneity. This might be overcome by using the multi-element array or volume birdcage coil. It is of interest to note that, the
use of free resonators in traveling wave might be a quite simple and efficient
method in wireless RF coil design at ultrahigh fields.
Acknowledgements
This work was
supported by NIH R01 EB016695.References
[1] Brunner DO, et al.
Nature 2009; 457:994-998. [2] Zhang X, et al. ISMRM 2014; p1357. [3] Kroeze H, et al. ISMRM 2009; p1320. [4] Kozlov M, et al, JMR 2009; 200: 147-152. [5] Collins CM, et al. MRM 2001; 45(4):684-91.