Tuning Microstrip Coil Field Patterns Using Capacitor-Segmented Ground Planes
Xinqiang Yan1,2, John C. Gore1,2,3, and William A. Grissom1,2,3

1Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States, 2Radiology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States, 3Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States

Synopsis

At 7T and higher, the B1 fields of loop and microstrip coils become asymmetric. However, B1 fields of dipole antennas are still symmetric. The different behaviors of dipole and microstrip coils may be explained by the fact that they have similar magnetic-field vectors but different Poynting vectors. We propose to manipulate the Poynting vector and thus the symmetry of the B1 patterns of microstrip coils using capacitor-segmented ground (CSG) planes. This concept has been validated by numerical studies and practical MRI experiments. The CSG method provides additional flexibility for manipulating the shape of the B1 field, which may be advantageous for RF shimming and parallel transmission.

Background

At field strengths of 7T and higher, the RF wavelength in biological tissue becomes similar to human head and body dimensions. Under this condition, the B1 fields of loop and microstrip coils become asymmetric [1]. However, the B1 fields of dipole antennas are still nearly symmetric even in body imaging at 7T [2]. The different behaviors of dipole and microstrip coils may be explained by the fact that they have similar magnetic (H-field) vectors but different Poynting vectors. We propose to manipulate the Poynting vector and thus the symmetry of the B1 patterns of microstrip coils using capacitor-segmented ground (CSG) planes in order to achieve improved coil performances.

Theory and Methods

In a conventional microstrip coil [3, 4], the E-field inside the coil is perpendicular to the conductor and the ground plane, as shown in Fig. 1A. When the ground is segmented by capacitors (referred to as Cseg), a parallel E-field component is produced, as shown in Fig. 1B. This component rotates the Poynting vector toward the target space and makes the B1 field pattern more symmetric, similar to a dipole antenna.

To validate this approach, we performed numerical simulations using HFSS (Ansys, Canonsburg, PA, USA). A conventional microstrip coil was modeled on a Teflon bar (25Χ5Χ2.5 cm3) (Fig. 1A, C). The widths of the conductor and ground were 1 cm and 5 cm, respectively. The ground plane of the CSG microstrip coil was uniformly segmented by seven identical capacitors (Cseg) (Fig. 1B, D). Cseg was set with different values (150 pF, 68 pF, 33 pF, 15 pF and 7.5 pF) to vary the length of the parallel E-field component. A cylindrical phantom with 30 cm length and 20 cm diameter was placed 2.5 cm below the coil. The phantom electrical properties were б=0.6 S/m and ξr=55, approximating average tissue properties at 7T. Input power was set at 1W in all simulations.

We also built a conventional and CSG microstrip coils with Cseg=7.5 pF. GRE images and B1+ maps on a water phantom were acquired on a 7T human Philips Achieva scanner (Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, Ohio, USA). The parameters of the GRE sequence were: FA=30o, TR/TE=100/10 ms, FOV=180 X 180 mm2, matrix= 256X256, thickness=3 mm. B1+ maps were measured with the DREAM method [5].

Results

The Poynting vector distribution inside the water phantom is shown in Fig. 2A (sagittal plane). The conventional coil’s Poynting vector points into the phantom only in the region immediately adjacent to the coil. In comparison, particularly for Cseg =15 and 7.5 pF, the Poynting vector of the CSG coil was almost uniformly directed into the phantom. Figs. 2B and C show the current distributions along the ground plane and the S11 plots vs. frequency. As Cseg decreases, its equivalent impedance increases and thus current in the ground decreases, so the current distribution becomes more like that of a dipole. Figs. 2D and E show the B1+ and B1- fields, respectively. As expected, the B1 field pattern became more symmetric (dipole-like) as Cseg decreases, thus demonstrating the ability to manipulate the symmetry of the B1 patterns by tuning Cseg.

Fig. 3A shows the constructed microstrip coils. For the CSG coil, three capacitors were connected in parallel (2.4 pF+2.7pF+2.4pF=7.5pF) in each slit. Fig. 3B compares the measured S11 curves and loaded Q-values. Figs. 3C and D show the GRE images and B1 maps, respectively. Similar to the simulation results, the B1 patterns of two coils are quite different: the conventional coil has a twisting B1 field and an obvious lobe, while the CSG microstrip coil has a relatively symmetric B1 field.

Discussions and Conclusion

We have developed a capacitor-segmented ground (CSG) approach for microstrip coils to change their intrinsic B1 field patterns. This concept has been validated by numerical studies and practical MRI experiments. The CSG method provides additional flexibility for manipulating the shape of the B1 field, which may be advantageous for RF shimming and parallel transmission. Although microstrip arrays have relatively low coupling, strong cross-talk still exists in 16-channel arrays [6, 7]. If the coupling among microstrip elements can be reduced using different capacitor segmentation schemes between elements, it should provide an easy and efficient method to create densely-spaced microstrip arrays. Furthermore, the CSG microstrip coil can be seen as a transmission-line-folded dipole antenna. However, unlike the dipole, the CSG microstrip coil can be fed at the end as well as at the center and the selection of length is more flexible.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NIH R01 EB016695.

References

[1] C. M. Collins, et al, MRM. 65:1470–1482 (2011). [2] A.J. Raaijmakers, et al, MRM. 66: 1488-1497 (2011). [3] G. Adriany, et al, MRM. 53:434–445 (2005). [4] X. Zhang, et al, MRM. 46: 443–450 (2001). [5] K. Nehrke, et al, MRM. 68:1517–26 (2012). [6] G. Adriany, et al, MRM. 59: 590–597 (2008). [7] C. J. Snyder, et al, MRM. 67: 954–964 (2012).

Figures

Figure 1 A and B: Sketches of E-field, H-field and Poynting vector distributions of the conventional microstrip coil and the capacitor-segmented ground (CSG) microstrip coil. C and D: 3-D models of the two coils used in EM simulations.

Figure 2 Simulation results of a conventional microstrip coil (without segments) and microstrip coils with capacitor-segmented grounds (Cseg=150pF, 68pF, 33pF, 15pF and 7.5pF). A: Poynting vector distribution inside the water phantom (in the sagittal plane). B: Current distribution on the ground. C: S11 plots vs. frequency and Q-values (loaded with the phantom). D and E: B1+ and B1- field distributions on the phantom (central axial slice).

Figure 3 A: Photographs of the conventional microstrip coil with a whole ground (left) and microstrip coil with a capacitor-segmented ground (right). For the segmented ground, three capacitors were connected in parallel (2.4 pF+2.7pF+2.4pF=7.5pF) in each slit. B: Measured S11 curves and Q values of the two coils. C: Measured GRE images on a water phantom using the two coils (FA=300, TR/TE=100/10ms, FOV=180X180mm2, matrix=256X256). D: Measured B1+ maps on a water phantom using the two coils.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
3533