Adrianus J. Bakermans1, Bart-Jan van den Berg2, Gustav J. Strijkers3, Maarten J. Versluis4, Dennis W.J. Klomp2,5, Aart J. Nederveen1, and Jeroen A.L. Jeneson1,6
1Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2MR Coils B.V., Drunen, Netherlands, 3Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 4Philips Healthcare Benelux, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 5Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 6Neuroimaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
Synopsis
Maximizing the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in in vivo cardiac phosphorus-31 magnetic
resonance spectroscopy (31P-MRS) remains a major challenge in investigations of human myocardial energy metabolism. Here, we demonstrate that
with a dual-tuned 1H/31P coil array with 4 elements, it
is feasible to achieve a higher SNR and a more homogeneous receive sensitivity distribution over
the region of interest for cardiac 31P-MRS at 3 Tesla than with a
standard linear single-turn 31P surface coil. Furthermore, the 4
channels available for 1H signal reception allow for cardiac cine 1H-MRI
with parallel imaging. Background
Maximizing the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in
in vivo cardiac phosphorus-31 magnetic
resonance spectroscopy (
31P-MRS) remains a major challenge in investigations of human myocardial energy metabolism. Typically, past studies
used a
31P transmit/receive surface coil positioned over the
chest close to the heart. Although a surface coil offers superior SNR compared
to a volume coil, it suffers from flip angle variations due to B
1
inhomogeneity and limited penetration depth. This compromises the spatial
localization of
31P-MRS signal acquisition from the heart, and hampers
the quantification of metabolite concentrations. Here, we present a novel coil
design consisting of dual-tuned
1H/
31P coil array with 4
elements in a geometric alignment tailored to achieve a larger and more
homogeneous field of view for
in vivo
31P-MRS compared to a standard
31P transmit/receive surface
coil. Moreover, the elements are arranged in quadrature to maximize SNR for
31P-MRS,
while detuning of the
1H resonance was integrated to facilitate
imaging and B
0 shimming.
Methods
Coil
design: The proposed coil system consists of 4
dual-tuned (1H @ 127.8 MHz; 31P @ 51.8 MHz) ∅ 15-cm elements
in an anterior-posterior 2×2 combination (Figure 1) with active detuning at
the 1H frequency. Quadrature RF transmission and signal reception
for 31P-MRS was routed via two X-nuclei channels. Four channels were
used for 1H signal reception. The setup was interfaced to a Philips
Ingenia 3.0 Tesla MR system (R5.1.8; Philips Healthcare, Best, The
Netherlands). The coil’s performance was compared with a standard linear
single-turn 31P transmit/receive surface coil (∅ 14 cm, Philips).
Phantom
studies: Two 9×9 gridded cryogenic storage boxes were
used as a spacer between the anterior and posterior elements. To achieve a coil
load similar to the human thorax, 500-mL 0.9% NaCl bags were placed on either
side of the spacer, directly adjacent to the coil elements (Figure 1). A 3-mL
vial filled with 15M phosphoric acid (H3PO4) was
positioned in the center of the field of view and used for 31P B1
calibrations. Coil reference B1 and drive scale were adjusted such
that a block pulse flip angle sweep yielded maximal signal intensity at the intended
90° excitation angle and zero signal at the intended 180° excitation angle. Next,
the receive sensitivity distribution was measured by relocating the 3-mL 15M H3PO4
vial to different positions within the grids, and acquiring signal with an
adiabatic pulse-acquire sequence.
In
vivo 1H-MRI and 31P-MRS studies: In vivo cardiac data were acquired in a
healthy male volunteer (29 y/76 kg/1.76 m) positioned supine in the MR scanner.
Acquisition of a left-ventricular short-axis cine 1H-MRI series was
performed with a balanced turbo field echo (BTFE) sequence (voxel size: 2.0×1.6
mm; matrix: 176×196; slice thickness: 8 mm; TR/TE: 2.8/1.41 ms; number of
averages: 2; SENSE reduction factor: 1.5; 30 heart phases; retrospective ECG
synchronization; single breath hold). Cardiac-triggered 3D-CSI was performed to
acquire localized 31P-MR spectra of the heart (voxel size: 40×40×40
mm; matrix: 8×8×8; block pulse; flip angle: 45°; TR: 1 heart beat; number of
averages: 1; 2048 data points; bandwidth 3000 Hz). Acquisition time was
approximately 8 min 30 s. For comparison, the same 3D-CSI sequence and settings
were used to obtain 31P-MR spectra from the same subject with the
standard linear single-turn 31P surface coil.
Results
Figure 2 shows
31P receive
sensitivity maps comparing the spatial distribution of SNR between the
4-element
1H/
31P coil array (A) and the linear single-turn
31P
surface coil (B). In the region relevant for cardiac
31P-MRS (boxed
areas in Figures 1-2), SNR was 24% higher (
p
= 0.0002, paired
t-test) and more
homogeneous for the 4-element coil system (32.2 ± 4.8, mean ± SD) than for the linear single-turn surface coil (26.0 ± 9.5). This translated into
a higher SNR for
in vivo 31P-MRS
of a 40×40×40 mm cardiac voxel with the 4-element
1H/
31P
coil compared to the linear single-turn
31P surface coil (Figure 3). In addition, cardiac cine
1H-MRI with the 4-element
1H/
31P
coil yielded images at a spatial and temporal resolution that will be
sufficient for the quantification of cardiac function (Figures 4-5).
Discussion
We demonstrated that with a
dual-tuned
1H/
31P coil array with 4 elements, it is
feasible to achieve a higher SNR and a more homogeneous receive sensitivity in the region of interest for cardiac
31P-MRS than with a standard
linear single-turn surface coil. Furthermore, the 4 channels available for
1H
signal reception allow for cardiac cine
1H-MRI with parallel
imaging. Combined, the current setup allows for assessments of heart function with
1H-MRI
and myocardial energy metabolism with
31P-MRS during a single examination.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National
Institutes of Health (A.J.B., G.J.S., A.J.N., and J.A.L.J.; subcontract to NIH
grant HL072011). References
No reference found.