Alexis Amadon1, Guillaume Ferrand2, Elodie Georget1, Eric Giacomini1, Edouard Chazel1, Marie-France Hang1, Jeremy Bernard1, Nicolas Boulant1, Vincent Gras1, Alexandre Vignaud1, and Michel Luong2
1CEA, DSV, I2BM, NeuroSpin, UNIRS, Gif-sur-Yvette, France, 2CEA, DSM, IRFU, SACM, LISAH, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Synopsis
This work compares the performance of two commercial RF coils with a new transmit-array hybrid coil developed at NeuroSpin for the human head at 7T. This z-segmented coil uses 11 transceiver dipoles connected to 7 power channels via an SVD-box, one transceiver patch to cover the top of the head, and 10 receive-only 3D loops in-between the dipoles. Its performance outbeats that of the commercial coils both in terms of signal-to-noise ratio and dynamic RF shimming efficiency.Introduction
The design of a transmit-array RF coil for high field MRI aims at
providing the best excitation homogeneity. More elements usually provide higher
homogeneity and lower local specific absorption rate (SAR). A hybrid RF head
coil, later referred as the ASTRE coil, consisting of 12 transceive elements ̶̶ 11 dipoles
and one circularly-polarized (CP) patch
̶̶ and 10 receive-only loops has
recently been proposed by our group
1 as an attempt to reach the best
compromise between performance and complexity. Here we compare the performance
of the ASTRE coil with 2 commercial coils, both in terms of signal-to-noise
ratio (SNR) and excitation homogeneity.
Methods
Our experiments were carried out on a 7T Magnetom scanner (Siemens
Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) equipped with an AC84 head gradient set and 8
independent RF channels for parallel transmission. The commercial RF head coils
used for benchmarking are 8-transceiver-loop Rapid-Biomedical (Rimpar, Germany)
and narrow-made 1-Tx/32-Rx Nova-Medical coils (Wilmington, MA, USA). The ASTRE
coil components are presented elsewhere1. The 1-kW power amplifiers
then drive the 12 Tx elements via an SVD box
2. All three coils are
depicted in Fig. 1. The comparisons were based on two tests performed on a
spherical 156-mm-diameter doped water phantom with the same conductivity as
that of a human brain. First, the SNR was assessed for each coil by estimating the
receive profile from a 3D FLASH sequence where the flip angle (FA) map was
predicted from prior B0- and B1-mapping
3. The FLASH image itself was
produced from a standard sum-of-squares combination of the Rx-channels. On the
transmit side, for the commercial coils, the default CP mode was used with a
broadband RF pulse. For the ASTRE coil, the k
T-point method
4
was applied to obtain a homogeneous excitation since no proper equivalent CP-mode
could be derived from the ASTRE coil geometry. A Bloch equation simulator then provided
the predicted FA-map for the FLASH sequence, which could yield the subsequent
reception profile. For the SNR calculation, the signal was taken as the mean of
the reception map in the phantom, while the noise was the standard deviation of
a “0-Volt” FLASH acquisition.
In a second step, an excitation homogenization experiment exploiting the
ASTRE and Rapid coils’ pTx capability was performed to compare their Tx-efficiencies.
The XFL sequence was used for multiple-channel B1-mapping in interferometric mode
5.
Subsequently a 5-k
T-point 30° pulse was designed with 0.9-ms total
duration, letting an Active Set algorithm find optimal k
T-point
locations given identical RF power constraints for both coils
6.
Because the preamplifier gain levels were different for each coil, all
experiments were performed with Siemens “high gain” mode in reception,
amplifying the signal by an extra 19 dB before digitization, which prevented
noise to be dominated by the ADCs or external sources for the pTx coils.
Results and Discusssion
The 3D coil SNR profiles are depicted for each coil in
Fig. 2. Compared to the Rapid coil, the ASTRE coil has 49% more SNR on average.
Moreover, even though it has 10 fewer Rx-elements than the Nova coil, its mean SNR
is also slightly better, by 7%. A deeper SNR analysis of the ASTRE coil reveals
the gain brought by the loops and patch is 19% on average (28% in the phantom
center) compared to the dipole-only coil. The patch alone accounts for a 4%
gain on average, 15% in the central part.
For the transmit efficiency comparison, the reference
voltage to generate a given average B1-field in the phantom with a pseudo CP-mode
was similar for both Rapid and ASTRE coils. However, for the k
T-point
experiment, the ASTRE coil outperformed the Rapid coil: the Bloch simulator
returned a 5.5 % rms FA spread (NRMSE) across the phantom (normalized to 30°
target) versus 7.4 % for Rapid. As a reference, the 1-Tx Nova coil fixed CP
mode yielded 33 % NRMSE. Moreover, the ASTRE coil seems to withstand higher
duty cycle, with a maximum time-averaged input power on the order of 8W per
channel according to preliminary results. We yet have to determine the SAR-predictive
model of the ASTRE coil. This work is underway with FEM simulations and
subsequent VOP compression
7.
Conclusion
The new ASTRE hybrid pTx coil
1 shows
promising results in terms of intrinsic SNR and excitation homogenization
efficiency. The improvements include z-segmentation of a higher number of
Tx-elements (some of which preceded by SVD power splitters), a transceiver
patch at the top of the head, and receiving loops decoupled from transceiving
dipoles by their peculiar 3D geometry.
Acknowledgements
Financial support by Conseil Général de
l’Essonne (ASTRE-2012).References
1. E. Georget, G. Ferrand, M. Luong, E. Giacomini, E.
Chazel, M.-F. Hang, J. Bernard, C. Poupon, A. Amadon, A transmit-array RF coil
with 12 transmit elements and 22 receive elements for an 8-channel parallel
transmission system at 7 T, poster at 6th UHF
Symposium in Berlin (2015).
2. G. Ferrand, M. Luong, M.A.
Cloos, A. France, A. Amadon, N. Boulant, L. Darrasse, SVD-based Hardware Concept to Drive N Transmit Elements of a Phased
Array Coil with M≤N channels for High Field MRI, e-poster #3888, ISMRM 2011.
3. A. Amadon, , F. Mauconduit, A. Vignaud, N. Boulant, Slice Profile Corrections in the XFL (Magnetization-Prepared Turbo-FLASH)
B1-Mapping Sequence, poster #2377, ISMRM 2015.
4. M.
Cloos, N. Boulant, M. Luong, G. Ferrand, E. Giacomini, D. Le Bihan, A. Amadon, kT -points: short three-dimensional tailored RF pulses for
flip-angle homogenization over an extended volume, Magn. Reson. Med. 67:72-80 (2012).
5. A. Amadon, M.A. Cloos, N. Boulant, M.-F. Hang, C.J. Wiggins, H.-P. Fautz, Validation
of a very fast B1-mapping sequence for parallel transmission on a human brain
at 7T, poster #3358, ISMRM 2012.
6. V. Gras, M. Luong, A. Amadon, N. Boulant, Joint design of
kT-points trajectories and RF pulses under explicit SAR and power
constraints in the large flip angle regime, accepted in J. Magn. Reson. (2015).
7. G. Eichfelder, M. Gebhardt, Local specific absorption rate control for
parallel transmission by virtual observation points, Magn. Reson. Med.
66:1468–1476 (2011).