Jarek Wosik1,2, Kurt Bockhorst3, Tan I-Chih4, Kuang Qin1, Krzysztof Nesteruk5, and Ponnada A Narayana3
1Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States, 2Texas Center for Superconductivity, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States, 3Radiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States, 4The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States, 5Institute of Physics of Polish Academy of Science, Warsaw, Poland
Synopsis
We report on the performance of receive only 300-MHz planar cryogenic
(both copper and superconducting) coils for MRI of rat brain at 7 T. The
double-sided coils were fabricated by patterning Cu and YBCO on laminate and
0.33 mm thick sapphire substrate, respectively. Practical limits of the performance
of the cryocoils (20 mm Cu and 17 mm superconducting) were tested using
3D-RARE, 2D-RARE, and RGB-FA maps recorded with EPI_DTI protocols. Both in-vivo
and ex-vivo images were acquired. Twofold SNR gain was achieved at 65K. Cryo-system
stability tests with over 11 hours of DTI ex-vivo scanning are presented.
Purpose
It is well known that in the case of a
sufficiently small coil, thermal noise of the system is dominated by coil
noise and that cooling of receiver coils, made either of Cu or
superconducting materials can provide very significant improvement of SNR
[1-3]. Recently, we have further developed [3-5] our 7 T MRI
1H (300.3 MHz)
receiver probe with the tuning/maching and decoupling circuitry. The new probe
was made to meet specific operating requirements such as low-loss electronics,
stable operating frequency at cryogenic temperatures over long periods of time,
very short coil-body distance, short preparation time, and user-friendly
operation. Our further objective was to explore the practical parameters of the
probe equipped with either copper or superconducting coil and its use for
ex-and in-vivo imaging of rat brain.
Methods and Results
A single-stage GM type pulse-tube cryo-cooler, CryMech model
HPT10 [6], was designed to operate horizontally. In order to meet certain
cooling requirements and high-magnetic field limitations, non-magnetic titanium
was used in the cold head design and the coil was separated by 8" distance
from the metal cold-head (Fig. 1a). A rotary valve was also separated from a
pulse tube expander (2 m stainless steel flexible helium lines). The HPT10
provides 16W at 77K and the lowest achievable temperature of the coils was
measured as 55 K. The coils vacuum shroud was designed to be compatible with
116 mm Bruker transmit coils (Fig. 1bc). Both superconducting (YBCO) and Cu
coils were similar in design as previously shown [5]. The matching/ tuning and
detuning circuit was integrated with the coil inside the cryostat and it was
designed to be the same for either superconducting or normal metal coils [6].
Measured unloaded and loaded (ex-vivo case) Qs were 280 (Cu 295 K), 750 (Cu 77
K), and 50,000 (HTS at 77 K) and 200, 460, and 890, respectively. A 7T/30 USR
MRI scanner (Bruker BioSpin, Karlsruhe, Germany and a homogenous
“rat-equivalent” phantom was used with the SNR measured by using the macro
Auto_snr that is part of the Bruker scanner software (Fig. 1d). This method
yields SNR per unit volume that is independent of the acquisition parameters
and allows for comparison across different scanners and different acquisition
parameters [7].
Comparison of axial ex-vivo rat brain images
acquired at 65 K and at 295 K for 11 hours 22 minutes (256 slices) is shown in
Fig. 3. The 50 µm isotropic resolution was achieved (3D-RARE, RARE factor 6, TR
500 ms, TE effective 38 ms, NA 8). A twofold increase of SNR was measured (Fig.
1d and 3). In vivo axial rat brain images were recorded also at 65 K and
295 K (Fig. 4). The upper left displays 2D-RARE (factor 4) images of the
Splenium, upper right Bregma -3 mm, second row at left Bregma -2 mm and at right
Bregma -1 mm. NA=4, acquisition time 33.5 min, TR 10010 ms, TE effective
22 ms, in plane resolution 0.1 mm, 100 slices, slice thickness 0.2 mm. For the
same location as in Fig. 4, axial RGB-FA maps were recorded with an EPI-DTI
protocol. The colors intensity reflects the FA-value. Splenium is coded red,
the Fimbria magenta, the Fornix green and Internal Capsule blue and green.
Acquisition parameters were: time 59.5 min, TR 350ms, TE 26ms, SW 227 kHz,
NA=1, 2 segments (aka shots), 42 icosahedral orientated directions, 9 bzero
images, b-value 800 s/mm^2, resolution 0.24x0.20 mm, slice-thickness 0.20 mm.
Fat suppression and saturation bands were activated.
Discussion and Conclusions
The targeted twofold SNR gain has been
realized by 20 mm diameter Cu coil for ex-vivo scans (Fig. 1d and 3). In-vivo
rat brain scans for 20 mm coil showed rat size dependent gain of SNR in the
range of 40% -60% (Fig. 4). It was found that optimization of the coil size for
twofold gain for in-vivo measurements requires the diameter reduction from 20
mm to 18-19 mm for copper coil and to 17 mm for superconducting coil. In the
latter case additional gain over copper coil of the same size (17 mm) was
obtained for both ex-vivo and in-vivo cases. Our technology allows to
acquire high resolution in vivo scans and high SNR of structures deep in
the brain, which were only accessible earlier in scans performed ex
vivo. The ex vivo scans with a slice thickness of 50 μm are close to the
thickness of histological sections. We believe that our existing setup is
capable to sample acceptable images with thinner slices, possibly 20-30 μm.
This facilitates highly improved comparisons between MRI and histological
sections.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Texas Center for
Superconductivity.References
[1] for review: L. Darrasse et al., Biochimie, 85, p.
915, 2003.
[2] Khare, et al., Superconductive Passive Devices, in
Applied Superconductivity : Handbook on Devices and Applications (ed P.
Seidel), Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany (2015).
[3] M. Kamel et al., Proc. ISMRM. 15 (2007) p. 327.
[4] J. Wosik et. al, Applied Physics Letters 91, 183503,
2007.
[5] J. Wosik, et al., Proc. ISMRM 22 (2014), p. 4808.
[6] J. Wosik, et al., Proc. ISMRM 20 (2012), p. 438.
[7] C. Wang, and P. E. Gifford, AIP Conf. Proc. 710, 1805
(2004).
[8] P. A. Narayana et al., Psychiatry Res. 2014
March 30; 221(3): 220–230.