Combining Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Model and Reduced FOV for Evaluation of Single Renal Diffusion and Perfusion
CY Wang1, R Zhang2, L Jiang3, R Wang4, XD Zhang4, H Wang3, K Zhao4, LX Jin3, J Zhang1,2, XY Wang1,4, and J Fang1,2

1Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China, People's Republic of, 2College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China, People's Republic of, 3Philips Healthcare, Suzhou, China, People's Republic of, 4Department of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China, People's Republic of

Synopsis

The sequence most commonly used in renal DWI is based on single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS-EPI), which is prone to artifacts and distortions related to susceptibility and eddy currents. Reducing these artifacts and distortions in SS-EPI generally requires a reduced field of view (rFOV) in the phase-encoding direction and/or reduced spatial resolution. To resolve these problems, a 2D rFOV-DWI sequence was introduced for imaging and further IVIM modeling. Compared with conventional full-FOV single-shot DWI techniques, rFOV-DWI methods generally produced images of superior quality. With the application of IVIM model, it is possible to evaluate single renal diffusion and perfusion simultaneously.

Background:

Recent advances in DWI have facilitated the application of IVIM model in the separate estimation of tissue perfusion and diffusivity [1]. IVIM parameters have shown sensitivity to renal allograft rejection and vascularity and cellularity of renal masses. The sequence most commonly used in renal DWI is based on single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS-EPI), which is prone to artifacts and distortions related to susceptibility and eddy currents. Reducing these artifacts and distortions in SS-EPI generally requires a reduced field of view (rFOV) in the phase-encoding direction and/or reduced spatial resolution. To resolve these problems, a 2D rFOV-DWI sequence was introduced for imaging and further IVIM modeling. With a 2D-RF excitation pulse [2], the required number of k-space lines in the PE direction is decreased, enabling higher resolution imaging with a proper scan time.

Purpose:

We used a combined IVIM-rFOV method to evaluate renal diffusion and perfusion.

Materials and Methods:

MR Imaging: All the MRI measurements were carried out on a 3.0 Tesla MR scanner (Achieva, Philips Medical Systems, Best, Netherlands). DWI was performed using full-FOV DWI and rFOV-DWI sequences, with the following b-values used for each acquisition: 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 150, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900 and 1000 sec/mm2. The diffusion gradients were applied in three orthogonal directions. Other imaging parameters are demonstrated in Table 1. For renal DWI imaging, a nonselective fat saturation pulse was applied to suppress fat signal, and respiratory triggering was applied to make the sequence motion insensitive.

Study Protocol: To demonstrate the efficacy of this rFOV-DWI technique, we performed a comparison study using a quality control phantom. The phase-encoding (PE) is along left-right direction. For renal imaging, twelve healthy young volunteers (22-26 years) were enrolled in this IRB-approved study. To assess the within-session and between-day reproducibilities of the the proposed method, both full-FOV DWI and rFOV DWI sequences were repeated in a 20 min interval and on a second day.

Quantitative Analysis: To mitigate respiratory motion artifacts, two-dimensional affine registration of DWI images was performed separately for the right and left kidney with an in-house software. ADC was also calculated using a monoexponential model with 16 b values. True diffusion coefficient D, pseudodiffusion (perfusional) coefficient D*, fraction of pseudo-diffusion f, were estimated using bixeponential model (least squares fitting) according to the following equation: M = M0(f·exp(-b·D)+(1-f)·exp(-b·D*)).

Two independent observers (with 7 years and 6 years of experience in abdominal MRI) rated the image quality for both the full-FOV DWI and the rFOV-DWI images and assigned a score with a 5-point scale (1 = poor image quality; 2 = acceptable image quality; 3 = fair image quality; 4 = good image quality; 5 = excellent image quality).

Results:

Image quality: DWI images of phantom and coronal kidney acquired using full-FOV DWI and rFOV DWI sequences are shown in Fig.2 and Fig.3. The rFOV-DWI sequence (Fig.1 (b,d)) effectively reduced spatial distortion at the edge of the phantom. For renal DWI, the full-FOV DWI image (Fig.2a) showed strong spatial blurring along the PE direction, and this blurring was dramatically reduced in the rFOV-DWI image (Fig.2b) due to higher spatial resolution and shorter ETL. Table 2 summarizes the image quality scores of full-FOV DWI images and rFOV-DWI images.

IVIM parameters: The rFOV-DWI based original images (τ = 0 ms) and calculated parametrical maps showed significantly better image quality with sufficient depiction of the cortico-medullary structure of the kidneys (Table 1). The ADC, D, and f values derived from rFOV-DWI images were each significantly higher in the cortex than in the medulla (P < 0.05 for each comparison). These results were consistent with previously reported literature values [3]. The within-session CVs of ADC measurement were 8.05% in the cortex and 5.02% in the medulla, while the between-day CVs of OEF measurement are 8.45% in the cortex and 5.02% in the medulla.

Conclusion:

With phantom and volunteer studies we demonstrated the feasibility of using rFOV-EPI techniques for single renal DWI imaging to either reduce artifacts and distortion caused by susceptibility differences or limit spatial blurring. Compared with conventional full-FOV single-shot DWI techniques, rFOV-DWI methods generally produced images of superior quality. With the application of IVIM model, it is possible to evaluate single renal diffusion and perfusion simultaneously.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

[1] D. Le Bihan. Radiology 2008; 249(3):748–752.

[2] Saritas E, et. al. Magn Reson Med 2008; 60:468–473.

[3] Ichikawa S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging, 2013, 31(3): 414-417.

Figures

Table 1. Imaging parameters for full-FOV DWI and rFOV-DWI sequences

Fig.1. Images of the quality control phantom (b = 0 sec/mm2) acquired using full-FOV DWI (a,c) and focused DWI(b,d) sequences. Less image distortion was observed in the focused DWI image. The rFOV DWI sequence effectively reduced blurring in the PE direction compared to full-FOV DWI.

Fig.2. Images of the kidney acquired using full-FOV DWI (a) and rFOV DWI (b) sequences (b = 0 sec/mm2). Note that the rFOV DWI sequence effectively reduced blurring in the PE direction compared to full-FOV DWI.

Fig.3. Representative ADC map (a), D map (b), D* map (c) and f map (d) derived from rFOV-DWI images.

Table 2. Image scores for full-FOV DWI and rFOV-DWI techniques (N = 12)



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
3483