CY Wang1, R Zhang2, L Jiang3, R Wang4, XD Zhang4, H Wang3, K Zhao4, LX Jin3, J Zhang1,2, XY Wang1,4, and J Fang1,2
1Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China, People's Republic of, 2College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China, People's Republic of, 3Philips Healthcare, Suzhou, China, People's Republic of, 4Department of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China, People's Republic of
Synopsis
The
sequence most commonly used in renal DWI is based on single-shot echo-planar
imaging (SS-EPI), which is prone to
artifacts and distortions related to susceptibility and eddy currents. Reducing these artifacts
and distortions in SS-EPI generally requires a reduced field of view (rFOV) in
the phase-encoding direction and/or reduced spatial resolution. To resolve these
problems, a 2D rFOV-DWI sequence was introduced for imaging and further IVIM modeling.
Compared with conventional full-FOV single-shot DWI techniques, rFOV-DWI
methods generally produced images of superior quality. With the application of IVIM
model, it
is possible to evaluate single renal diffusion and perfusion simultaneously.Background:
Recent advances in DWI have facilitated the application of
IVIM model in the separate estimation of tissue perfusion and diffusivity [1]. IVIM
parameters have shown sensitivity to renal allograft rejection and vascularity and
cellularity of renal masses. The sequence most commonly used in renal DWI is
based on single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS-EPI), which is prone to artifacts and distortions related to susceptibility and
eddy currents. Reducing these artifacts and distortions in SS-EPI generally requires a reduced field of view (rFOV) in
the phase-encoding direction and/or reduced spatial resolution. To resolve these
problems, a 2D rFOV-DWI sequence was introduced for imaging and further IVIM modeling. With a 2D-RF excitation pulse [2], the required number of k-space lines
in the PE direction is decreased, enabling higher resolution imaging with a
proper scan time.
Purpose:
We used a
combined IVIM-rFOV method to evaluate
renal diffusion and perfusion.
Materials and Methods:
MR
Imaging:
All the MRI measurements were
carried out on a 3.0 Tesla MR scanner (Achieva, Philips Medical Systems, Best,
Netherlands). DWI was performed using full-FOV DWI and rFOV-DWI sequences, with
the following b-values used for each acquisition: 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 150,
200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900 and 1000 sec/mm2. The diffusion
gradients were applied in three orthogonal directions. Other imaging parameters
are demonstrated in Table 1. For renal DWI imaging, a nonselective fat saturation
pulse was applied to suppress fat signal, and respiratory
triggering was applied to make the sequence motion insensitive.
Study Protocol:
To demonstrate the efficacy of this rFOV-DWI technique,
we performed a comparison study using a quality control phantom. The
phase-encoding (PE) is along left-right direction. For renal imaging, twelve healthy young volunteers (22-26
years) were enrolled in this
IRB-approved study. To assess
the within-session and between-day reproducibilities of the the proposed method,
both full-FOV DWI and rFOV DWI sequences were repeated in a 20 min interval and
on a second day.
Quantitative Analysis:
To mitigate respiratory motion
artifacts, two-dimensional affine registration of DWI images was performed
separately for the right and left kidney with an in-house software.
ADC was also calculated using a
monoexponential model with 16 b values. True diffusion coefficient D,
pseudodiffusion (perfusional) coefficient D*, fraction of
pseudo-diffusion f, were estimated using bixeponential model (least
squares fitting) according to the following equation: M = M0(f·exp(-b·D)+(1-f)·exp(-b·D*)).
Two independent observers (with 7
years and 6 years of experience in abdominal MRI) rated the image quality for
both the full-FOV DWI and the rFOV-DWI images and assigned a score with a 5-point
scale (1 = poor image quality; 2 = acceptable image quality; 3 = fair image
quality; 4 = good image quality; 5 = excellent image quality).
Results:
Image
quality: DWI images of phantom and coronal kidney acquired using full-FOV DWI and rFOV
DWI sequences are shown in Fig.2 and Fig.3. The rFOV-DWI sequence (Fig.1 (b,d))
effectively reduced spatial distortion at the edge of the phantom. For renal DWI,
the full-FOV DWI image (Fig.2a) showed strong spatial blurring along the PE
direction, and this blurring was dramatically reduced in the rFOV-DWI image
(Fig.2b) due to higher spatial resolution and shorter ETL. Table 2 summarizes the
image quality scores of full-FOV DWI images and rFOV-DWI images.
IVIM parameters: The rFOV-DWI based original images (τ = 0 ms) and calculated parametrical maps showed significantly better
image quality with sufficient depiction of the cortico-medullary structure of
the kidneys (Table 1). The ADC,
D, and f values derived from rFOV-DWI images were each significantly higher in the cortex than
in the medulla (P
< 0.05 for each comparison). These results were consistent with previously reported
literature values [3]. The within-session CVs of ADC measurement were 8.05%
in the cortex and 5.02% in the medulla, while the between-day CVs of OEF
measurement are 8.45% in the cortex and 5.02% in the medulla.
Conclusion:
With phantom and volunteer studies
we demonstrated the feasibility of using rFOV-EPI techniques for single renal DWI
imaging to either reduce artifacts and distortion caused by susceptibility
differences or limit spatial blurring. Compared with conventional full-FOV single-shot
DWI techniques, rFOV-DWI methods generally produced images of superior quality.
With the application of IVIM model, it is possible to evaluate single renal
diffusion and perfusion simultaneously.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1]
D. Le Bihan. Radiology 2008; 249(3):748–752.
[2]
Saritas E, et. al. Magn Reson Med 2008; 60:468–473.
[3]
Ichikawa S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging, 2013, 31(3): 414-417.