Quantitative Diffusion MRI of Hematopoietic Acute Radiation Syndrome using a Minipig Model
Frederick C. Damen1,2, Matthew Lindeblad3, Kejia Cai2,4, Michael Flannery2, Yi Sui2, Amelia M Bartholomew5, Aleksander V Lyubimov3, and Xiaohong Joe Zhou2,4,6,7

1Radiology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States, 2Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States, 3Pharmacology, University of Illinois Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States, 4Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States, 5Surgery, University of Illinois Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States, 6Radiology, Chicago, IL, United States, 7Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States

Synopsis

The purpose of this study is to characterize Hematopoietic Acute Radiation Syndrome (hARS) and assess the effect of total body irradiation in a Göttingen minipig model using quantitative diffusion MRI. The minipigs were irradiated at a total dose of either 1.65 Gy (LD30/45 days) or 1.90 Gy (LD70/45 days). The animals underwent diffusion MRI scans prior to and again at 8, 15, or 22 days following irradiation. The consistent diffusion value prior to irradiation and the significant changes post-irradiation, both observed in this study, suggest that quantitative diffusion MR can be a viable marker for studying the effect of total body irradiation.

Purpose

Given the threat of terrorism and incidental spillover of radio-active materials, it is important to develop in vivo, non-invasive imaging techniques to assess the effect of total body irradiation1. Diffusion MRI, especially with high b-values, has been shown to be sensitive to tissue microstructural and pathologic changes associated with a number of diseases2 and cancer radiation therapy3. The purpose of this IACUC-approved study is to characterize hematopoietic Acute Radiation Syndrome (hARS) due to excessive total body irradiation in a Göttingen minipig model using quantitative diffusion MRI. The outcome of this study may provide helpful information for the follow-up evaluations of radiation exposure using medical countermeasures.

Methods

Animals: Thirteen male Göttingen minipigs (5 to 7 months old, 9-17 kg) were obtained from Marshall Bioresources (North Rose, NY). The minipigs were fed once daily with Harlan No. 8753 (Harlan, Madison, WI). Water was provided ad libitum. The minipigs were fasted at least 12 hours prior to irradiation and imaging.

Irradiation: Total body irradiation of the minipigs was performed using a 6 MeV LINAC photon source (Varian model #EX-21) at 60 to 80 cGy/min for a total dose of either 1.65 Gy (LD30/45 radiation dose at which 30% of the animals succumb at 45 days) or 1.90 Gy (LD70/45)4.

MR Imaging: All animals underwent diffusion MRI scans prior to irradiation to establish a baseline and imaged again at 8, 15, or 22 days post irradiation. Diffusion weighted abdominal images of the anesthetized minipig’s were acquired using a 3T MRI scanner (MR750, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI) with a 32-element phased-array coil and a customized single-shot spin-echo EPI sequence (TR/TE = 8000/77 ms, field of view = 240x240 mm2, matrix = 256x256, slice thickness = 5 mm, number of slices = 64, diffusion b-value = 0, 250, 500, 750, 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500 s/mm2).

Image Analysis: Using a noise resilient Theil-Sen linear regression algorithm5, the multi-b-value diffusion images were fit to an intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model6 on a voxel basis. Histograms of the diffusion coefficient (D) were obtained from the regions of interest (ROI)of the spleen on the b=0 images and confirmed with the corresponding high-resolution T1- and T2-weighted images. Statistical difference of the mean D values between pre- and post- irradiation was determined using a one-tailed unequal-variance Student t-test. Significance was prescribed at p<0.05.

Results

Figure 1 shows a set of representative quantitative diffusion images of the abdomen before and after irradiation. The pre-irradiated spleen diffusion coefficient D was consistent among all animals (0.53±0.03 10-3mm2/s). In all but two of the irradiated minipigs, the mean D for the spleen significantly decreased after irradiation (e.g., ΔD between 0.04 and 0.18 x10-3 mm2/s, p<0.05), as shown in Fig. 2. The decrease in D was not statistically different between the LD30 and LD70 groups. In eight of the pre-irradiation diffusion maps, the histograms of the spleen D values were unimodal (Fig. 3a), whereas five were trimodal (Fig 3b) which fitted well (R2>0.99) to a tri Gaussian model. After irradiation, the histograms for all animals became unimodal (green in Fig. 3).

Discussion and Conclusion

The spleen, as a multifaceted organ, plays a key role in the maintenance of the body’s blood supply. The spleen pools both red and white blood cells, and, filters and breaks down senescent erythrocytes. Both functions may be affected by a hematopoietic insult4,7. The release of pooled red and white blood cells by the spleen’s red pulp and white pulp, respectively, is consistent with the reduced production of blood cells due to damaged hematopoietic cells4,7. The reduction in the spleen’s D may be due to the reduction in blood cells and hence the associated water content. The spleen’s red pulp’s activity increases and expands in response to digestion8 and may explain the pre-irradiation multi-model histogram of D. The post-irradiated animals lack this variability which may be due to the compromised digestion. The lack of observed difference between the two radiation doses may be due to the small sample size.

Diffusion weighted imaging in the abdomen is challenging due to perfusion and noise due to motion artifacts. The use of the IVIM model helped filter out the perfusion effect and the Theil-Sen linear regression provided robustness against noise.

The consistent diffusion value prior to irradiation and the significant changes post-irradiation, both observed in this study, suggest that quantitative diffusion MR may be a viable marker for studying the effect of total body irradiation.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by BARDA HHSO100201100014I / HHSO10033001T. These are the personal views of the individual authors and do not necessarily express the opinions or policies of the US Department of Health and Human Services or its affiliates. The MRI facility is supported by a grant from the NIH (1S10RR028898).

References

1) DiCarlo, Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2011;5:S32-S44.

2) Le Bihan, Radiology 2013; 268:318-322.

3) Tsien, Seminars in Radiation Oncology. 2014;24:218-226.

4) Moroni, et.al., PLos ONE 6(9) e25210.

5) Sen, et.al., J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 63(324), 1968.

6) Le Bihan, et.al., Radiology 1988; 168:497-505.

7) Wang, et.al., Eur Radiol (2012) 22:1844-1851.

8) Grey, Anatomy of the Human Body, 1918.

Figures

Figure 1: Quantitative diffusion coefficient maps obtained from the pre-irradiated abdomen (a) and the spleen (b) of a minipig, and the post-irradiated abdomen (c) and the spleen (d).

Figure 2: Changes of diffusion coefficient D from pre-irradiation to post-irradiation. Each line corresponds to an individual minipig. LD30 in red and LD70 in blue.

Figure 3: Histograms of spleen D values in pre- (red) and post-irradiation (green) from two representative minipigs. a) unimodal pre-irradiation. b) multimodal pre-irradiation. Histograms after the irradiation both became unimodal.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
3480