Synopsis
In this work we present
our results obtained at the 7T MRI scanner investigating the nerves in the
forearm. We tested two DTI protocols and were able to visualize the median,
ulnar and radial nerves with fiber tractography with resolution up to 0.75×0.75×2.0
mm3. We have demonstrated the potential of 7T to identify
these nerves and quantify their diffusion characteristics in a reliable way. We
expect that the use of high resolution DTI can be beneficial in the
investigation of peripheral nervous tissue in the forearm and might aid in
identifying changes due to pathology. Purpose
Diffusion tensor
imaging (DTI) has been widely used to investigate peripheral nerves1,2.
It is non-invasive and allows for the evaluation of microstructural tissue
properties of these nervous structures. As such, DTI could be beneficial to
study peripheral nervous disorders such as multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN).
This disease is characterized by weakness in the muscle without any sensory involvement,
where distal limbs are usually first affected3. One of the main
drawbacks of DTI applied to peripheral nerve imaging is that due to the
generally low spatial resolution, partial volume effects occur4 confounding
the estimation of diffusion parameters. With 7T MRI higher resolutions can be
achieved without any major loss in signal to noise ratio (SNR) compared with 3T
MRI. However, a higher field strength also has its drawback, since it suffers
from more pronounced susceptibility induced deformation5. Reducing
susceptibility deformation can be achieved by using higher parallel imaging
factors, which benefit from using a dedicated high density receive coil array.
In this study, we explore the use of 7T to investigate the nerves in the
forearm using DTI and fiber tractography (FT) and evaluate the results from two
acquisition schemes with different image resolution.
Methods
Written
informed consent was given prior to the MRI examination. 4 healthy volunteers
underwent MRI for the right forearm on a 7 Tesla MR system (Achieva; Philips
Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) using a dedicated 32 channel wrist coil. DTI
data was acquired with a voxel size of 0.75×0.75×2.0 mm
3 (high-resolution
protocol) and a voxel size of 1.0×1.0×2.0 mm
3 (low-resolution
protocol), using a diffusion-weighted spin echo single-shot echo planar imaging
(EPI) protocol (for all acquisition parameters see Table 1). An axial T1 TSE
was obtained for anatomical reference. The DTI data were processed with
ExploreDTI6. First, DTI scans were corrected for subject
motion, eddy current distortions, and EPI deformations
7,8. Diffusion
tensors were fitted using the REKINDLE procedure
9. Second, whole volume
tractography was performed with a seeding density of 2x2x2 mm
3, a fractional
anisotropy (FA) threshold of 0.35 and a curvature threshold of 30°. Last, 2 SEED ROIs and 1 AND ROI were used to select a segment of 5 cm of
three nerves of the forearm (i.e. median, ulnar, and superficial radial nerve).
From these segments the FA, mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and
radial diffusivity (RD) were computed.
Results
Figure 1 shows data and diffusion parameters maps
derived from both DTI protocols. From the DTI data it was possible to
reconstruct the median and ulnar nerves in the forearm of all datasets using FT
(Fig. 2). In all but one low-resolution dataset, it was possible to reconstruct
the superficial radial nerve. Table 2 and Figure 3 show the diffusion values for
both low- and high-resolution protocols. The MD, AD, and RD showed a tendency
(not significant) toward lower values in the low-resolution protocol for the
ulnar and median nerve compared to the high-resolution protocol.
Discussion
Although higher
resolutions in DTI typically lead to a reduction in partial volume effects
4,
MD and RD values in the median, ulnar, and radial nerve were not significantly
different between both DTI protocols in this study. However, FA values are
higher and MD, and RD values are lower, compared to an earlier study visualizing
the nerves in the forearm at 3T
10. Another study at 3T with a
reconstructed resolution of 1.0×1.0×3.0 mm
3, shows higher FA values,
and lower MD, AD, and RD
2. A study in the upper arm at 3T with a
resolution of 1.14×1.14×4 mm
3 showed similar results, but decreased
RD values
11. All these differences might be SNR related
12.
With the high-resolution data the radial nerve could be reconstructed in all
subjects, which was not the case with the low-resolution protocol and in an
earlier study at 3T
10.
Conclusion
This DTI study
shows that the median, ulnar, and superficial radial nerves in healthy
volunteer subjects can be investigated reliably at 7T. Although these are
preliminary results with a small sample size, we have clearly demonstrated the potential
of 7T to identify these nerves and quantify their diffusion characteristics in
a reliable way. No significant differences in diffusion values between the
protocols were found. However, compared to earlier studies at 3T, partial
volume effects are likely to be reduced with increased resolution of DTI at 7T.
We expect that the use of high resolution DTI can be beneficial in the
investigation of peripheral nervous tissue in the forearm and might aid in
identifying changes due to pathology.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Hiltunen
J, Suortti T, Arvela S, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging and tractography of
distal peripheral nerves at 3 T. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116(10):2315-23
[2] Zhou Y, Narayana P a, Kumaravel M, et al. High resolution
diffusion tensor imaging of human nerves in forearm. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;39(6):1374–83
[3] Vlam L, van der Pol WL, Cats EA, et al. Multifocal motor
neuropathy: diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment strategies. Nat Rev Neurol. 2011;8(1):48-58
[4] Vos SB, Jones DK, Viergever MA, et al. Partial volume
effect as a hidden covariate in DTI analyses. Neuroimage. 2011;55(4):1566–76
[5] Polders DL, Leemans A, Hendrikse
J, et al. Signal to Noise Ratio and Uncertainty in Diffusion Tensor Imaging at
1.5, 3.0, and 7.0 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;33(6):1456-63
[6] Leemans A, Jeurissen B, Sijbers
J, et al. ExploreDTI: a graphical toolbox for processing, analyzing, and
visualizing diffusion MR data. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med. 2009;17:3536.
[7] Leemans A, Jones DK. The B-matrix
must be rotated when correcting for subject motion in DTI data. Magn Reson Med.
2009;61(6):1336–49
[8] Irfanoglu MO, Walker L, Sarlls J,
et al. Effects of image distortions originating from susceptibility variations
and concomitant fields on diffusion MRI tractography results. Neuroimage. 2012;61(1):275-88
[9] Tax CMW, Otte WM, Viergever M, et
al. REKINDLE: Robust extraction of kurtosis INDices with linear estimation. Magn Reson Med. 2015;73(2):794-808
[10] Haakma W, Jongbloed BA, Froeling M, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of forearm
nerves for early diagnosis of multifocal motor neuropathy. Intl Soc Mag Reson
Med.2015, 3004
[11] Breckwoldt MO, Stock C, Xia A,
et al. Diffusion Tensor Imaging Adds Diagnostic Accuracy in Magnetic Resonance
Neurography. Invest Radiol. 2015; 50(8):498-504
[12] Froeling M, Nederveen AJ, Nicolay K, et al. DTI of human skeletal muscle: the
effects of diffusion encoding parameters, signal-to-noise ratio and T2 on
tensor indices and fiber tracts. NMR Biomed. 2013;26(11):1339-52