Intra Voxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) in Brain Regions: a Repeatability and Aging Study
Eric T Peterson1, Natalie M Zahr1,2, Dongjin Kwon1, Matthew Serventi1, Cheshire Hardcastle1, Edith V Sullivan2, and Adolf Pfefferbaum1

1Biosciences, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, United States, 2Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States

Synopsis

This work investigates the inter- and intra-session repeatability and the effects of age on intra voxel incoherent motion (IVIM) parameters. Atlas registration allowed for parcellation-based region specific brain analysis. A new and robust fitting approach reliably identified the perfusion fraction, diffusion, and pseudo-perfusion parameters from 15 healthy normal volunteers. The results show that IVIM is repeatable and that the perfusion fraction, diffusion, and pseudo-perfusion parameters are significantly higher in older than younger adults in several brain regions, most likely from perivascular CSF infiltration. This work serves to highlight how age is an important factor to consider when using IVIM.

Purpose

Intra-voxel incoherent motion (IVIM) can probe both diffusion and pseudo-perfusion by using a range of b-values, typically 0 to <1000 (s/mm2)1–3. Lower b-values are sensitive to capillary-level perfusion, and higher b-values are sensitive to tissue diffusion. This ability to measure diffusion and perfusion in a single scan is desirable for studies where both metrics are desired, such as alcoholism4,5 and stroke3. This work introduces both a new IVIM fitting procedure and robust anatomically-based region-driven analysis in order to investigate test-retest variability within and between scan sessions and age effects on IVIM in five brain structures.

Theory

Equation 1 shows IVIM signal equation assuming pseudo-perfusion (fe-bD*) and diffusion ((1-f)e-bD) compartments. A four parameter fit of S0 (signal), f (perfusion fraction), D* (pseudo-diffusion coefficient), and D (diffusion coefficient) is performed where S(b) is the signal intensity at each of the diffusion values b. The product fD* represents a pseudo-perfusion parameter1.

Equation 1: $$$S\left(b\right)=S0\left(fe^{-bD^{*}}\right)+\left(1-f\right) e^{-bD} )$$$

Methods

Subjects:

Healthy normal volunteers (9 men, 6 women; age 23.5 to 67.6 years, mean±std=41.7±17.4) were scanned on a GE MR750 3T (GE Medical Systems, Waukesha, WI, USA) with an 8-channel head coil (Invivo Co, Gainesville, FL, USA).

Acquisition:

All subjects received a structural, two identical echo-planar imaging (EPI) IVIM, and a reversed phase encode (PE) polarity EPI scan (Table 1). Seven subjects were scanned twice with the same protocol >24 hours apart to determine the intra-session (between scans in the same session) and inter-session (between scans on separate days) repeatability.

Pre-Processing:

All IVIM scans were EPI-distortion and eddy-current corrected using FSL5 (Topup, Eddy)6,7. The SRI24 atlas8 was registered to the IVIM image via the IR-SPGR, and all IVIM images were registered together using ANTS9. SRI24 brain and parcellation masks were transformed to IVIM space and eroded using a 3x3x3 kernel to minimize cross-region and fluid-tissue contamination.

IVIM fitting:

Each image voxel and ROI signal vector were fit individually for S0, f, D, and D* (Equation 1) using a multi-step approach illustrated in Figure 1, which was implemented in Python2.710.

1. Linearly fit $$$\ln\left(S\left(b>200\right)\right)$$$ for S0’ and D, where S0’ is the zero intercept of the diffusion fit at b>200.

2. Linearly fit $$$\ln\left(S\left(b\leq200\right)\right)$$$ for S0 and D*’, where D*’ is the combination of D and D* decays.

3. Calculate f: $$$f=1-\frac{S0'}{S0}$$$.

4. Fit all b-values using Equation 1 for D* keeping S0, f, and D fixed.

5. Fit S0, f, D, and D* using Equation 2 with the previous values as initial guesses and λ=0.01.

This produces a single set of IVIM parameters for each ROI and each voxel in the image (Figure 2).

Analysis:

The statistical analysis in R11 focused on the thalamus, cingulum, amygdala, caudate nucleus, and pons using factors f, D, and fD*. The intra-session (for all 15 subjects and the seven young subjects with two scan sessions) and inter-session (for all subjects with two scan sessions) differences were analyzed using intraclass correlation (ICC). The age analysis used a two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test on all subjects to compare two age groups (<45 years, n=10; >45 years, n=5).

Equation 2: $$S\left(b\right)=S0\left(fe^{-bD^{*}}\right)+\left(1-f\right) e^{-bD} )+\\\lambda\left|\frac{S0-S0_{initial\_guess}}{S0_{initial\_guess}}\right|+\lambda\left|\frac{f-f_{initial\_guess}}{f_{initial\_guess}}\right|+\lambda\left|\frac{D-D_{initial\_guess}}{D_{initial\_guess}}\right|+\lambda\left|\frac{D^{*}-D^{*}_{initial\_guess}}{D^{*}_{initial\_guess}}\right|$$

Results

The ICC results show that for most factors in all regions, the intra-session repeatability is moderate to extremely high, and the inter-session repeatability is high with a few exceptions, the caudate, amygdala, and pons (Table 2). The values for f, D, and fD* were higher in the older group, illustrated in Figure 3.

Discussion

We found that reliable results are produced using the new fitting procedure combined with regional analysis. The intra-session ICC values are significant for all regions and metrics for either the full set of scans or the set of seven younger subjects scanned twice. The majority of the inter-session ICC values are also significant, indicating good inter-day repeatability. The lower inter-session relative to intra-session ICC values may be related to physiological variation across time.

The age-related correlation of greater f, D, and fD* in older adults is contrary to the expected perfusion decrease with age12 and occurred despite atlas erosion to minimize CSF contamination. This age difference may arise from CSF-filled perivascular spaces which can influence IVIM measures13 and also expand with age14. These results emphasize how age is an important factor to consider when interpreting IVIM results.

Conclusion

IVIM metrics are significantly repeatable between scans and scan days and show significant and increasing effects with age in f, D, and fD*, which may arise from enlargement of CSF-filled perivascular space with age and highlight how age is an important consideration when using IVIM.

Acknowledgements

NIH grants: AA017168, AA010723, AA012388, AA017347

References

1. Federau C, Maeder P, O’Brien K, Browaeys P, Meuli R, Hagmann P. Quantitative Measurement of Brain Perfusion with Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MR Imaging. Radiology. 2012;265(3).

2. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin M-L, Vignaud J, Laval-Jeantet M. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology. 1988;168(2):497-505.

3. Federau C, Sumer S, Becce F, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion perfusion imaging in acute stroke: initial clinical experience. Neuroradiology. 2014:629-635.

4. Gazdzinski S, Durazzo T, Jahng G-H, Ezekiel F, Banys P, Meyerhoff D. Effects of chronic alcohol dependence and chronic cigarette smoking on cerebral perfusion: a preliminary magnetic resonance study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2006;30(6):947-958.

5. Bühler M, Mann K. Alcohol and the human brain: A systematic review of different neuroimaging methods. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011;35(10):1771-1793.

6. Andersson JLR, Skare S. A model-based method for retrospective correction of geometric distortions in diffusion-weighted EPI. Neuroimage. 2002;16(1):177-199.

7. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage. 2004;23 Suppl 1:S208-S219.

8. Rohlfing T, Zahr NM, Sullivan E V., Pfefferbaum A. The SRI24 multichannel atlas of normal adult human brain structure. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009;31(5):798-819.

9. Avants BB, Tustison NJ, Song G, Cook PA, Klein A, Gee JC. A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration. Neuroimage. 2011;54(3):2033-2044.

10. Van Rossum G. Python 2.7, Python Software Foundation. 1991.

11. R Core Team. R Language Definition V. 3.1.1. 2014;3.1.1:55. http://mirror.fcaglp.unlp.edu.ar/CRAN/doc/manuals/r-patched/R-lang.pdf\nhttp://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-lang.pdf.

12. Liu Y, Zhu X, Feinberg D, et al. Arterial spin labeling MRI study of age and gender effects on brain perfusion hemodynamics. Magn Reson Med. 2012;68(3):912-922.

13. Federau C, O’Brien K. Increased brain perfusion contrast with T2-prepared intravoxel incoherent motion (T2prep IVIM) MRI. NMR Biomed. 2015;28(1):9-16.

14. Heier L a, Bauer CJ, Schwartz L, Zimmerman RD, Morgello S, Deck MD. Large Virchow-Robin spaces: MR-clinical correlation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1987;10(5):929-936.

Figures

Table 1: Acquisition parameters for the structural, IVIM, and distortion correction reversed phase encode polarity scans.

Figure 1: An example fit of the cingulum and a visual representation of the five steps of the fitting procedure. Each step is color coded and boxed to highlight the information used and the results produced. Step 3 calculates f using the equation f=1-S0’/S0.

Figure 2: The axial (A) and coronal (B) f maps from a single subject with thalamus masks overlaid in green for right and red for left. Note the similarity and robustness of the fits in the b-value vs. signal semi-log plots shown for the right (C) and left (D) thalamus.

Table 2: The repeatability significance table showing full intra- (n=15), intra- with subjects with two scans (n=7), inter- (n=7) session ICC values. The ICC significance codes with family-wise Bonferroni correction for five comparisons are <0.01 *, <0.001 **, <0.0001 ***.

Figure 3: The box-plots showing f, D, and fD* for all five regions plotted by the two age groups, <45 and >45. The Mann-Whitney U test significance codes with family-wise Bonferroni correction for five comparisons are <0.01 *, <0.001 **, <0.0001 ***.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
3410