Synopsis
This work investigates the inter- and intra-session
repeatability and the effects of age on intra voxel incoherent motion (IVIM)
parameters. Atlas registration allowed for parcellation-based region specific
brain analysis. A new and robust fitting approach reliably identified the
perfusion fraction, diffusion, and pseudo-perfusion parameters from 15 healthy
normal volunteers. The results show that IVIM is repeatable and that the
perfusion fraction, diffusion, and pseudo-perfusion parameters are significantly higher in
older than younger adults in several brain regions, most likely from perivascular
CSF infiltration. This work serves to highlight how age is an important factor to consider
when using IVIM.Purpose
Intra-voxel incoherent motion (IVIM) can probe both
diffusion and pseudo-perfusion by using a range of b-values, typically 0 to <1000
(s/mm
2)
1–3. Lower b-values are sensitive
to capillary-level perfusion, and higher b-values are sensitive to tissue diffusion.
This ability to measure diffusion and perfusion in a single scan is desirable
for studies where both metrics are desired, such as alcoholism
4,5 and stroke
3. This work introduces both a
new IVIM fitting procedure and robust anatomically-based region-driven
analysis in order to investigate test-retest variability within and between
scan sessions and age effects on IVIM in five brain structures.
Theory
Equation 1 shows IVIM signal equation assuming pseudo-perfusion
(fe-bD*) and diffusion ((1-f)e-bD) compartments. A four
parameter fit of S0 (signal), f (perfusion fraction), D* (pseudo-diffusion coefficient),
and D (diffusion coefficient) is performed where S(b) is the signal intensity
at each of the diffusion values b. The product fD* represents a pseudo-perfusion
parameter1.
Equation 1: $$$S\left(b\right)=S0\left(fe^{-bD^{*}}\right)+\left(1-f\right) e^{-bD} )$$$
Methods
Subjects:
Healthy normal volunteers (9 men, 6 women; age 23.5 to 67.6
years, mean±std=41.7±17.4) were scanned on a GE
MR750 3T (GE Medical Systems, Waukesha, WI, USA) with an 8-channel head coil
(Invivo Co, Gainesville, FL, USA).
Acquisition:
All subjects received a structural, two identical echo-planar
imaging (EPI) IVIM, and a reversed phase encode (PE) polarity EPI scan (Table
1). Seven subjects were scanned twice with
the same protocol >24 hours apart to determine the intra-session (between scans
in the same session) and inter-session (between scans on separate days) repeatability.
Pre-Processing:
All IVIM scans were EPI-distortion and eddy-current
corrected using FSL5 (Topup, Eddy)6,7. The SRI24 atlas8 was registered to the IVIM image via the
IR-SPGR, and all IVIM images were registered together using ANTS9. SRI24 brain and parcellation masks were
transformed to IVIM space and eroded using a 3x3x3 kernel to minimize
cross-region and fluid-tissue contamination.
IVIM fitting:
Each image voxel and ROI signal vector were fit
individually for S0, f, D, and D* (Equation 1) using a multi-step approach illustrated in Figure
1, which was implemented in Python2.710.
1. Linearly fit $$$\ln\left(S\left(b>200\right)\right)$$$ for S0’ and D,
where S0’ is the zero intercept of the diffusion fit at b>200.
2. Linearly fit $$$\ln\left(S\left(b\leq200\right)\right)$$$ for S0 and D*’,
where D*’ is the combination of D and D* decays.
3. Calculate f: $$$f=1-\frac{S0'}{S0}$$$.
4. Fit all b-values using Equation 1 for D* keeping
S0, f, and D fixed.
5. Fit S0, f, D, and D* using
Equation 2 with the previous values as initial guesses and λ=0.01.
This produces a single set of IVIM parameters for each ROI and
each voxel in the image (Figure 2).
Analysis:
The statistical analysis in R11 focused on the thalamus,
cingulum, amygdala, caudate nucleus, and pons using factors f, D, and fD*. The
intra-session (for all 15 subjects and the seven young subjects with two scan
sessions) and inter-session (for all subjects with two scan sessions)
differences were analyzed using intraclass correlation (ICC). The age analysis
used a two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test on all subjects to compare two age groups
(<45 years, n=10; >45 years, n=5).
Equation 2: $$S\left(b\right)=S0\left(fe^{-bD^{*}}\right)+\left(1-f\right)
e^{-bD}
)+\\\lambda\left|\frac{S0-S0_{initial\_guess}}{S0_{initial\_guess}}\right|+\lambda\left|\frac{f-f_{initial\_guess}}{f_{initial\_guess}}\right|+\lambda\left|\frac{D-D_{initial\_guess}}{D_{initial\_guess}}\right|+\lambda\left|\frac{D^{*}-D^{*}_{initial\_guess}}{D^{*}_{initial\_guess}}\right|$$
Results
The ICC results show that for most factors in all regions,
the intra-session repeatability is moderate to extremely high, and the
inter-session repeatability is high with a few exceptions, the caudate, amygdala,
and pons (
Table 2). The values for f, D, and fD* were higher in the older
group, illustrated in
Figure 3.
Discussion
We found that reliable results are produced using the new
fitting procedure combined with regional analysis. The intra-session ICC values
are significant for all regions and metrics for either the full set of scans or the
set of seven younger subjects scanned twice. The majority of the inter-session
ICC values are also significant, indicating good inter-day repeatability. The lower inter-session relative to intra-session ICC values may be related to
physiological variation across time.
The age-related correlation of greater f, D, and fD* in
older adults is contrary to the expected perfusion decrease with age12 and occurred despite atlas
erosion to minimize CSF contamination. This age difference may arise from CSF-filled
perivascular spaces which can influence IVIM measures13 and also expand with age14. These results emphasize how age is an important factor to consider when interpreting IVIM results.
Conclusion
IVIM metrics are significantly repeatable between scans and
scan days and show significant and increasing effects with age in f, D, and fD*,
which may arise from enlargement of CSF-filled perivascular space with age
and highlight how age is an important consideration when using IVIM.
Acknowledgements
NIH grants: AA017168, AA010723, AA012388, AA017347
References
1. Federau C, Maeder P, O’Brien K, Browaeys
P, Meuli R, Hagmann P. Quantitative Measurement of Brain Perfusion with
Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MR Imaging. Radiology. 2012;265(3).
2. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin
M-L, Vignaud J, Laval-Jeantet M. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in
intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology. 1988;168(2):497-505.
3. Federau C, Sumer S, Becce F, et al.
Intravoxel incoherent motion perfusion imaging in acute stroke: initial
clinical experience. Neuroradiology. 2014:629-635.
4. Gazdzinski S, Durazzo T, Jahng G-H,
Ezekiel F, Banys P, Meyerhoff D. Effects of chronic alcohol dependence and
chronic cigarette smoking on cerebral perfusion: a preliminary magnetic
resonance study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2006;30(6):947-958.
5. Bühler M, Mann K. Alcohol and the human
brain: A systematic review of different neuroimaging methods. Alcohol Clin
Exp Res. 2011;35(10):1771-1793.
6. Andersson JLR, Skare S. A model-based
method for retrospective correction of geometric distortions in
diffusion-weighted EPI. Neuroimage. 2002;16(1):177-199.
7. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, et
al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation
as FSL. Neuroimage. 2004;23 Suppl 1:S208-S219.
8. Rohlfing T, Zahr NM, Sullivan E V.,
Pfefferbaum A. The SRI24 multichannel atlas of normal adult human brain
structure. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009;31(5):798-819.
9. Avants BB, Tustison NJ, Song G, Cook PA,
Klein A, Gee JC. A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric
performance in brain image registration. Neuroimage.
2011;54(3):2033-2044.
10. Van Rossum G. Python 2.7, Python Software
Foundation. 1991.
11. R Core Team. R Language Definition V. 3.1.1.
2014;3.1.1:55. http://mirror.fcaglp.unlp.edu.ar/CRAN/doc/manuals/r-patched/R-lang.pdf\nhttp://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-lang.pdf.
12. Liu Y, Zhu X, Feinberg D, et al. Arterial
spin labeling MRI study of age and gender effects on brain perfusion
hemodynamics. Magn Reson Med. 2012;68(3):912-922.
13. Federau C, O’Brien K. Increased brain
perfusion contrast with T2-prepared intravoxel incoherent motion (T2prep IVIM)
MRI. NMR Biomed. 2015;28(1):9-16.
14. Heier L a, Bauer CJ, Schwartz L, Zimmerman
RD, Morgello S, Deck MD. Large Virchow-Robin spaces: MR-clinical correlation. AJNR
Am J Neuroradiol. 1987;10(5):929-936.