Ulrike Dydak1,2, Ruoyun Ma1,2, Nora Hernandez3, Johnathan P Dyke4, and Elan Louis3,5,6
1School of Health Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States, 2Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States, 3Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Heaven, CT, United States, 4Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States, 5Center for Neuroepidemiology and Clinical Neurological Research, Yale School of Medicine, New Heaven, CT, United States, 6Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Heaven, CT, United States
Synopsis
Whether current use of the
medication primidone affects dentate γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) concentrations
is unknown. Yet, this may be an important confounder in studies of the
pathophysiology of essential tremor (ET). Using the MEGA-PRESS J-editing
sequence, we found no difference in dentate GABA levels between patients taking
primidone and patients not taking primidone. Furthermore, there was no
association between daily primidone dose and dentate GABA concentration. These
data suggest that it is not necessary to exclude ET patients on primidone from
MRS studies of dentate GABA concentration.Purpose
: While gamma-aminobutyric
acid (GABA)-edited MRS has become popular for non-invasive measurements of
brain GABA levels in a variety of neurological and psychiatric diseases1,
little is known about the effects of medication on the measured GABA levels.
For example, it is not known whether current use of the medication primidone
affects brain GABA concentrations. This is an important potential confounder in
studies of the pathophysiology of essential tremor (ET), one of the most common
neurological diseases. Studies have found a 30-40% reduction of Purkinje cells
(PC)2 in ET, which release γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) into the cerebellar
dentate nucleus3. Thus, there is an interest in investigating the
possibility of cerebellar dentate GABA level serving as an in vivo marker of PC number. However, it is estimated that
approximately 50% of all ET patients haven taken primidone4, one of
the two main medications for ET treatment5,6. Primidone is known to
bind to GABAA receptor, potentiating GABA-ergic neurotransmission.
Thus, this study aims at investigating whether current use of primidone has an
effect on dentate GABA concentrations as measured by MRS.
Methods
We are currently performing a study on ET for which patients
taking GABA-ergic medication are excluded. 26 ET patients from this pool, who
have never taken primidone, were recruited together with 6 additional ET
patients, chronically taking primidone, to assess the effect of primidone on
GABA MRS. Demographic information and medical history questionnaires were
collected for each subject. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment
(MoCA) was performed as a brief assessment of cognitive function
7.The
Washington Heights-Inwood Genetic Study of ET (WHIGET) tremor rating scale was used
to rate postural and kinetic tremor
8.
MRS exams were conducted on a 3T Siemens Tim Trio scanner,
equipped with a 32-channel head coil. Volumes of interest (VOIs) were centered
on left and right cerebellar dentate nucleus (25mm×25mm×25mm). For GABA
detection the MEGA-PRESS J-editing sequence was used (TR/TE=1500/68 ms, 392
averages)
9. High-resolution MPRAGE images were acquired
(TR/TE/TI=2300/2.91/900ms, voxel size: 1.0×1.0×1.2mm3, GRAPPA=2) for
tissue segmentation. The spectra were quantified using LCModel 6.3-0L
10,
with basis sets generated from density matrix simulations using chemical shifts
and J-coupling values from Kaiser et al
11. The voxel placement and
an example of an LCModel fitted spectrum are shown in Fig. 1. GABA levels
corrected for CSF were obtained as described by Chowdhury et al
12.
All statistical analyses were performed in SPSS (version 21.0). Student’s t
test, Fisher’s exact tests, and Mann Whitney tests (for variables not normally
distributed) were used to compare demographic and clinical features of ET cases
on primidone vs. ET cases off primidone. The correlations between dentate GABA
levels and demographic and clinical features were assessed using Student’s t
test as well as correlation coefficients. Linear regression models were
established to analyze the association between primidone status and GABA
concentrations, adjusted for potential confounds.
Results
The two groups did not differ in their demographic and clinical
features (Table 1). While right dentate GABA was significantly higher than left
dentate GABA in all ET patients (p<0.001), both right and left dentate GABA
concentrations were similar in the two groups (right: 2.21±0.46 [on primidone]
vs. 1.93±0.39 [off primidone], p=0.15; left: 1.61±0.35 [on primidone] vs.
1.67±0.34 [off primidone], p=0.72) (Fig. 2).
Dentate GABA concentration was not correlated with age, gender, years
of education, or total tremor score. Higher right dentate GABA concentration
was weakly associated with a lower MoCA score (r = -0.42, p = 0.03). In the six
medicated cases, there was no association between the daily primidone dose and
either right dentate GABA levels (Pearson’s r = 0.11, p = 0.89) or left dentate
GABA levels (Pearson’s r = -0.24, p = 0.76). In a linear regression model that
adjusted for potential confounds (number of drinks of ethanol per month, tremor
duration, MoCA score), taking primidone was not associated with either the
right dentate GABA concentration (beta = 0.27, p = 0.17) or the left dentate
GABA concentration (beta = -0.24, p = 0.22).
Conclusion and discussion
To
our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the effects of current, daily
administration of primidone on MRS-assessed dentate GABA concentration. Our
data addresses a question about a major potential confounder in studies of ET
pathophysiology. The fact that no difference was found in dentate GABA
concentrations between patients taking primidone or not, as well as the lack of
any association between daily primidone dose and dentate GABA concentration
suggests that it is not necessary to exclude ET patients on primidone from MRS
studies of dentate GABA concentration.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NINDS R01 NS085136 from the National Institutes of Health.References
1 Puts NAJ, Edden RA. In vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy of
GABA: A methodological review. Prog. Nuc. Mag. Res. Spec. 2012; 60: 29-41
2.
Louis ED, Babij R, Lee M, Cortes E, Vonsattel JP. Quantification of cerebellar
hemispheric purkinje cell linear density: 32 ET cases versus 16 controls. Mov
Disord. 2013.
3.
Gambarana C, Loria CJ, Siegel RE. GABAA receptor messenger RNA expression in
the deep cerebellar nuclei of Purkinje cell degeneration mutants is maintained
following the loss of innervating Purkinje neurons. Neuroscience.
1993;52:63-71.
4.
Louis ED, Rios E, Henchcliffe C. How are we doing with the treatment of
essential tremor (ET)?: Persistence of patients with ET on medication: data
from 528 patients in three settings. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17:882-4.
5.
Zesiewicz TA, Elble RJ, Louis ED, Gronseth GS, Ondo WG, Dewey RB, Jr., et al.
Evidence-based guideline update: treatment of essential tremor: report of the
Quality Standards subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.
Neurology.77:1752-5.
6.
Benito-Leon J, Louis ED. Clinical update: diagnosis and treatment of essential
tremor. Lancet. 2007;369:1152-4.
7.
Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I,
et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild
cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:695-9.
8.
Louis ED. Utility of the hand-drawn spiral as a tool in
clinical-epidemiological research on essential tremor: data from four essential
tremor cohorts. Neuroepidemiology. 2015;44:45-50.
9.
Edden RA, Barker PB. Spatial effects in the detection of gamma-aminobutyric
acid: improved sensitivity at high fields using inner volume saturation. Magn
Reson Med. 2007;58:1276-82.
10.
Provencher SW. Estimation of metabolite concentrations from localized in vivo
proton NMR spectra. Magn Reson Med. 1993;30:672-9.
11.
Kaiser LG, Young K, Meyerhoff DJ,
Mueller SG, Matson GB. A detailed analysis of localized J-difference GABA
editing: theoretical and experimental study at 4 T. NMR Biomed. 2008;21:22-32.
12.
Chowdhury FA, O'Gorman RL, Nashef L, Elwes RD, Edden RA, Murdoch JB, Barker GJ,
Richardson MP. Investigation of Glutamine and GABA levels in patients with
idiopathic generalized epilepsy using MEGAPRESS. j Magn Reson Imag. 2015;41:697-9.