Imaging effects of memantine treatment in a mouse model of Huntington disease using evoked and resting-state fMRI
Wei-Tang Chang1, Fiftarina Puspitasari1, Ling-Yun Yeow1, Hui-Chien Tay1, Marta Garcia Miralles2, Katrianne Bethia Koh2, Liang-Juin Tan2, Mahmoud POULADI2,3, and Kai-Hsiang Chuang1

1SBIC, A*STAR, Singapore, Singapore, 2TLGM, A*STAR, Singapore, Singapore, 3Department of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

Synopsis

Huntington disease (HD) is an incurable neurodegenerative disease. Recently, memantine (MMT) was found to be effective delaying the progression of disease phenotypes in a mouse model of HD. Here we applied resting-state fMRI to evaluate functional connectivity in HD and the MMT treatment effect and its behavioral correlates. The results of forepaw stimulation reduced evoked responses though significance was hampered by large individual variation. Interestingly, functional connectivity outside of DMN, but not within DMN, was decreased by HD. With MMT treatment, the connectivity increased in general. The FC relevant to the behavioral test also showed behavioral correlates.

INTRODUCTION

Huntington disease (HD) is an incurable neurodegenerative disorder caused by an expansion in CAG trinucleotide repeats in the huntingtin gene [1] and is characterized by neurodegeneration particularly in striatum and cortex [2]. Recently, memantine (MMT) was found to be effective in reducing aberrant extrasynaptic NMDA receptor activity delaying the progression of disease phenotypes in a mouse model of HD [3]. But how does the drug alter the brain function and connectivity is not clear. Here we applied BOLD fMRI to evaluate connectivity in HD and to understand the effects of MMT treatment and its behavioral correlates.

METHODS

The animal study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (A*STAR, Singapore). YAC128 HD mice and their littermate controls on the FVB/N strain were used (10 WT, 9 HD and 6 MMT-treated HD). The mice were treated with MMT or vehicle for 8 months and scanned at 10 months of age. Behavioural assessments of treated mice included the novel object recognition (NOR) and the climbing test. The mice were anesthetized with medetomidine (0.3 mg/kg bolus, 0.15 mg/kg infusion) and isoflurane (0.25-0.4%). MRI was performed on a 9.4T MRI (Bruker BioSpec, Germany). 16 axial slices were acquired using gradient-echo EPI with TR=1s, TE=15 ms, thickness=0.5mm, matrix=64 × 64, and FOV=20×20mm2. Resting-state fMRI was acquired for 10 min and then evoked fMRI was conducted with electrical forepaw stimulation [4].The data was pre-processed by motion correction (SPM). Nuisance signals from the ventricles and muscles, and 6 motion parameters were decomposed by SVD to determine the singular vectors that contributed fluctuation of whole brain and then removed from the data. The data was filtered between 0.01 and 0.1Hz, co-registered to a labeled brain template, and spatially smoothed by a Gaussian kernel (FWHM=0.6 mm). The functional connectivity (FC) maps were calculated by correlation analysis based on seed points and 66 regions defined by the atlas [5].

RESULTS

BOLD activation by stimulation showed reduced activity in both MMT and vehicle treated HD mice though the difference was not significant (Fig.1).

The resting-state data shows that FC in caudate putamen (CPu) and S1 forelimb (SLFL) was reduced in HD mice while increased in medial parietal association cortex (MPtA), and retrosplenial cortex (RSP). MMT treatment increased all of them (Fig.2). Whole-brain correlation matrix showed that connectivity within the default mode (DMN)-like network was the same but reduced elsewhere (Fig.3). The MMT-treated HD mice had generally higher FC throughout the brain especially outside of DMN-like network. Strong correlation between FC and behavior was observed (Fig.4). The latency to climb was correlated with FC between lateral parietal association cortex (LPtA) and lateral globus pallidus (GPe), which is an area involved in the regulation of voluntary movement. NOR correlated with FC between CPu and ventral anterior cingulated area (ACAv), which is known to associate with novelty detection.

DISCUSSION

The results of forepaw stimulation reduced evoked responses though significance was hampered by large individual variation. Interestingly, functional connectivity outside of DMN, but not within DMN, was decreased by HD. With MMT treatment, the connectivity increased, suggesting MMT may improve excitatory transmission [6]. Less change in the DMN-like network may be due to the lesser involvement of DMN with the striatum. The FC relevant to the behavioral test also showed behavioral correlates. This study shows that resting-state fMRI can be a potential biomarker for detecting disease-related change and treatment response in transgenic mouse model.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. Walker FO (2007) “Huntington's disease”. Lancet 369:218-228.

2. Huber SJ, Paulson GW. “Memory impairment associated with progression of Huntington's disease”. Cortex 1987; 23(2): 275-83.

3. Okamoto, S.-I. et al. Balance between synaptic versus extrasynaptic NMDA receptor activity influences inclusions and neurotoxicity of mutant huntingtin. Nat Med 15, 1407–1413 (2009).

4. Nasrallah FA, Tay HC, Chuang KH (2014) “Detection of functional connectivity in the resting mouse brain”. Neuroimage 86:417-424.

5. Ullmann JF, et al., (2013) “A segmentation protocol and MRI atlas of the C57BL/6J mouse neocortex”. Neuroimage 78:196-203.

6. Lorenzi M, et al., (2011) “Effect of memantine on resting state default mode network activity in Alzheimer's disease”. Drugs Aging 28:205-217.

Figures

Fig. 1: S1 activation in different groups. (a) The activation maps of control, HD, and MMT-HD groups. (b) Percentages of BOLD signal changes in three groups. (c) Percentages of activated areas in S1. For (b) and (c), no statistically significant difference was found in any pair of comparison.

Fig. 2: The two-sample t-test of connectivity maps between groups with respect to different seeds. The maps of control v.s. HD are on the left and MMT-HD v.s. HD on the right. From top to bottom are the maps with respect to the seeds at CPu, S1FL, MPtA and RSP.

Fig. 3: Correlation matrices of each group and the corresponding two-sample t-test. (a) The correlation matrices of control, HD and MMT-HD groups. The color bar encodes the correlation coefficient. (b) The matrices of control v.s. HD, MMT-HD v.s. HD, and MMT-HD v.s. control groups. The color bar encodes the t-value.

Fig. 4: Scatter plots of FCs and behavioral data. (a) Climbing test. The y axis is the FC between LPtA and GPe. (b) NOR test. The y axis is the FC between ACAv and CPu.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
3385