Jason Langley1, Jan Sedlacik2, Daniel E Huddleston3, Xiaoping Hu1, Jens Fiehler2, and Kai Boelmans4
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University & Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA, United States, 2Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany, 3Department of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States, 4Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
Synopsis
Recent results found that the SN seen in
neuromenalnin sensitive MRI and iron sensitive T2-weighted contrasts is located
in disparate spatial positions in controls. Since iron is known to be deposited
in the SN after onset of Parkinson's disease(PD), we re-examine iron sensitive measurements with
respect to these new findings in this abstract. Specifically, we find that the
SN seen in T2-weighted contrasts is enlarged in inferiorly and medially when
compared to controls. Most of this discrepancy happens in the NM SN and we
found the overlap to be an incredibly sensitive marker for PD (p<10-15).Background
T
2*-weighted contrasts
sensitive to iron, such as R
2 mapping
1, susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI)
2, and quantitative susceptibility mapping
3,4 have been used to evaluate iron deposition in the substantia
nigra (SN) in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Much of the iron deposition occurs in
the SN pars compacta (SNpc), which contains a dense distribution of
neuromelanin generating dopaminergic neurons
5,6. Recent results have found that the SNpc, as seen in
neuromelanin (NM) sensitive MRI, and the iron containing SN, seen in T
2*-weighted
contrasts and denoted iron SN, are located in different spatial positions
7. In this abstract, we will re-examine
iron sensitive measurements with respect to SNpc, defined by NM MRI.
Methods
A
cohort of 82 subjects who provided written, IRB-approved, informed consent were
studied. Demographic data for the cohort is listed in Table
1.
All
data were acquired on a 3 T MRI scanner (Skyra, Siemens Medical Solutions,
Erlangen, Germany) using a 20 channel receive only coil. SWI was performed
using a 3D gradient echo sequence with the following parameters: TE/TR=20/50
ms, 56 contiguous slices, 384×288 imaging matrix, 229×172 mm² field of view, 1
average, FA=17°, and 50 Hz/pixel receiver bandwidth. Images from an MP-RAGE
sequence (TE/TR/inversion time=2.46/1900/900 ms, FA=9°, voxel
size=0.94×0.94×0.94 mm3) were used for registration from subject
space to common space. The processing pipeline for T2w/SWI and common space
registration is shown in Figure 1A.
Standard
space NM SN masks from literature7 were
used to define NM SN regions in this analysis. Iron containing SN volumes were
generated by thresholding the T2-weighted images using the
thresholding procedure depicted in Figure 1B. After segmentation, iron SN
volumes were transformed into MNI and SN probability maps were generated for
both groups by summing the transformed maps over the subjects and normalizing by
the total number of subjects in each group. In addition, the overlap between
the iron and NM SN volumes were calculated for each subject in
subject space.
Results and Discussion
Iron
containing SN volume was slightly larger in the PD group than the control group
(PD:624±156.8mm3; Control:570.0±133.5mm3; p=0.03). A comparison of the spatial probability
map for the iron SN in control and PD groups in MNI space is shown in Figure 2. In common space, the inferior and medial
portions of the iron SN in the PD group are enlarged compared to the control
group. Furthermore, the increase in the iron SN in PD invades the NM SN, suggesting that the overlap
between iron SN and NM SN can be used as a new PD biomarker.
The
map for the probability of overlap between the iron SN and the NM SN in control
and PD groups is shown in Figure 3. Lateral and
superior areas of the NM SN exhibit a high probability of overlap with the iron
SN in the PD group. In the control group, lateral areas on the edge of the NM
SN have a higher probability of overlap with the iron SN. The distribution of
spatial overlap occurs in the ventral lateral tier and is consistent with
histological work5.
There is
greater overlap between the iron SN and NM SN volumes in the PD population
compared to controls (control:0.09±0.05; PD:0.23±0.06; p<10-15). No
relationship was seen between overlap of the iron SN and NM SN volumes with
UPDRS–III score (p=0.40;R2=0.02), likely indicating that
the overlap is an early marker for PD that changes negligibly after disease
onset. In addition, we found increased angular frequency/iron deposition in both
NM SN (p=0.001) and overlapped
volumes (p<0.001) in the PD group.
These results are summarized in Figure 4.
In
this study, regions used for the SN were defined using NM SN masks generated
from a group of healthy controls. This procedure is beneficial since it allows
for retrospective analysis of acquired data. In addition, using NM to derive SN regions in controls allows
for the examination of PD related changes in a more standardized and unbiased
manner since iron
deposition occurs at different rates in PD patients as the size and morphology
of the iron SN will depend on this deposition. Individual NM SN masks
could be used in lieu of these masks. However, a reduction in NM sensitive
contrast in PD is expected, and NM SN ROIs derived from PD patients will be
smaller than those derived from the controls.
In
conclusion, we have found increased iron deposition in the ventral lateral tier
of the SNpc and developed PD specific biomarkers related to this finding.
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by the Michael J. Fox Foundation
(MJF 10854) and NINDS Parkinson's Disease Biomarkers Program U18
Award (U18 NS082143).References
1. Martin, et al. Neurology
2008;70(16):1411-7.
2. Schwarz, et al. PLoS One 2014;
9(4):e93814.
3. Lotfipour, et al. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;35(1):48-55.
4. He, et al. Hum Brain Mapp
2015; 36(11):4407-20.
5. Fearnley and Lees. Brain 1991;114(5):2283-301.
6. Dexter, et al. Brain
1991;114(4):1953-75.
7. Langley, et al. Neuroimage
2015; 112(1):7-13.