Synopsis
In
the present study we used multi-shell Hybrid Diffusion Imaging (HYDI) to study
white matter changes in the acute stage of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Nineteen mTBI patients and 23
trauma-controlled subjects were recruited and studied within 1 month of injury. Non-parametric diffusion analysis, q-space
imaging as well as parametric analyses including conventional DTI and novel
neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) were used to analyze
the HYDI data. Only intra-axonal volume
fraction of the NODDI model showed significant and diffuse decrease in white
matter of the mTBI patients. Purpose
Mild
traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is an enormous public health problem that can be
associated with prolonged neurobehavioral sequelae. Currently mTBI is diagnosed
based on clinical assessment, which often includes self-report. As yet there is no objective imaging biomarker of sufficient
sensitivity and specificity to be considered a valid and reliable indicator of mTBI. Self-report measures of mTBI may be
unreliable
1, heightening interest in neuroimaging biomarkers that
could be used to more accurately diagnose mTBI and assist in monitoring
recovery and treatment. Diffusion MRI (dMRI) measures water diffusion
behaviors in biological systems, and is sensitive to microstructural changes in
white matter (WM). Recent developments in
dMRI enable direct links of diffusion measurements to WM microstructures. We used multi-shell Hybrid Diffusion Imaging
(HYDI)
2 for non-parametric diffusion analysis, q-space imaging
2,
and parametric analyses including conventional DTI and novel neurite
orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI)
3. NODDI hypothesizes WM microstructures in
three compartments: extracellular, intracellular and cerebrospinal fluid
compartment. The evaluated NODDI parameters may explain cellular level changes
in mTBI.
Method
Participants: Nineteen mTBI patients and 23
trauma-controlled subjects were recruited from the Emergency Department. The demographics of the subjects are listed
in Table 1. The MRI studies were performed in the acute
stage, within 1 month of injury. MRI: Participants received T1W SPGR and HYDI in a
Philips 3T Achieve TX scanner with 8-channel head coil and SENSE parallel
imaging. The diffusion-weighting (DW)
pulse sequence was a SS-SE-EPI sequence. TR was 3.59 sec. Other MR parameters
were: TE = 114.24 ms, δ/Δ=46/58.4
ms, voxel size=2*2 mm2, 40 slices with slice thickness =3 mm, parallel-imaging
SENSE factor=2. The total scan-time was about 24 min. Similar to reference 2, the diffusion
encoding scheme consisted of one b0 and 5 b-value shells (250, 1000,
2250, 4000, and 6250 s/mm2) with total 142 DW directions (6, 21, 24,
30, and 61 in each shell). Image
processing: The whole
dataset was processed with a non-parametric approach, q-space imaging, and
yielded P0, a tissue restriction index2,4,5. The first and second shell was processed for
DTI, which produces diffusion measures including fractional anisotropy (FA),
mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD). A parametric approach using the NODDI model
used the whole HYDI dataset. NODDI
produces intracellular (i.e., intra-axonal in WM cases) volume fraction (Vic),
extracellular volume fraction (Vec), volume fraction (Viso)
of isotropic fast diffusion (e.g., CSF), and fiber orientation dispersion index
(ODI)3. The NODDI fitting was
performed using AMICO-NODDI package6. WM ROI: Forty-eight WM ROIs were defined in the standard
MNI space by intersecting subjects’ mean WM skeleton with WM atlas of Johns
Hopkins University (JHU) ICBM-DTI-817 (Figure 1). All diffusion
measures were non-linearly transformed to standard MNI space with FSL FNIRT8.
Statistics: Linear model analysis was used to test the
significance of diffusion metrics between mTBI and trauma-controlled groups
with sex and gender as covariates (model 3 in Table 2). Multiple
comparisons across 48 ROIs were adjusted using false discovery rate (FDR) with significant
level at q-value < 0.05.
Results and Discussions
Maps
of DTI, q-space and NODDI diffusion metrics of an mTBI subject are shown in
Figure 2. Among various diffusion metrics, only the NODDI
derived intracellular volume fraction (V
ic) was sensitive to mTBI
with significant decreases in 60% of WM ROIs (
Table 2). The mTBI subjects
had an approximately 4% decrease in V
ic. Given the NODDI microstructural assumption of
rigid-stick axons (fixed intra-axonal axial diffusivity and near-zero
intra-axonal radial diffusivity), V
ic represents parenchymal axonal
density (1-V
iso). In
addition, significant decreases of V
ic were accompanied by significant
increases of V
ec (i.e., V
ec = 1 - V
ic). Therefore, the results suggest that in the
acute stage of mTBI, the density of stick-like axons decreases and the inter-axonal
space increases. Furthermore, the organization
of axons described by DTI fractional anisotropy (FA) and NODDI orientation
dispersion index (ODI) remains unchanged. The overall tissue restriction described by P
0
and DTI axial and radial diffusivities did not show significant difference
between groups. The prevalence of V
ic-significant
ROIs described a diffuse change in WM in the acute phase of mTBI (
Table 2). The affected WM tracts concentrated on pyramidal
tracts and its cortical projections (bilateral corona radiatae). Most of the cerebella related tracts and
hippocampal tracts are spared.
Conclusion
HYDI
and its diffusion metrics provide insights about microstructural changes of WM
in the acute stage of mTBI and may prove useful as a marker of injury.
Acknowledgements
The work is
supported by NIH R21 NS075791 and IUPUI-ITDP grants.References
1. Ruff
RM, Iverson GL, Barth JT, Bush SS, Broshek DK, Policy NAN, et al.
Recommendations for diagnosing a mild traumatic brain injury: a National
Academy of Neuropsychology education paper. Archives of clinical neuropsychology
: the official journal of the National
Academy of Neuropsychologists. 2009;24(1):3-10.
2. Wu
YC, Alexander AL. Hybrid diffusion imaging. Neuroimage. 2007;36(3):617-29.
PMCID: 2428345.
3. Zhang
H, Schneider T, Wheeler-Kingshott CA, Alexander DC. NODDI: practical in vivo
neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain.
Neuroimage. 2012;61(4):1000-16.
4. Assaf
Y, Mayk A, Cohen Y. Displacement imaging of spinal cord using q-space
diffusion-weighted MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2000;44(5):713-22.
5. Ozarslan
E, Koay CG, Shepherd TM, Komlosh ME, Irfanoglu MO, Pierpaoli C, et al. Mean
apparent propagator (MAP) MRI: a novel diffusion imaging method for mapping
tissue microstructure. Neuroimage. 2013;78:16-32. PMCID: 4059870.
6. Daducci
A, Canales-Rodriguez EJ, Zhang H, Dyrby TB, Alexander DC, Thiran JP.
Accelerated Microstructure Imaging via Convex Optimization (AMICO) from
diffusion MRI data. Neuroimage. 2015;105:32-44.
7. Oishi
K, Zilles K, Amunts K, Faria A, Jiang H, Li X, et al. Human brain white matter
atlas: identification and assignment of common anatomical structures in
superficial white matter. Neuroimage. 2008;43(3):447-57. PMCID: 2586008.
8. Smith
SM, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, Rueckert D, Nichols TE, Mackay CE, et al.
Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion
data. Neuroimage. 2006;31(4):1487-505.