Jing Jiang1, Xin Yang2, Wenli Lai2, Qiyong Gong1, and Kaiming Li1
1Department of Radiology, Huaxi MR Research Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, People's Republic of, 2West China Hospital of stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, People's Republic of
Synopsis
To investigate the neural mechanism of placebo
effects in orthodontic pain, we conducted a fMRI study
where twenty-three volunteers, under orthodontic pain induced by separators,
were scanned without placebos and followed by another scan with placebos a
month later. During both scans, participants were instructed to perform a bite (with
maximum strength)/no-bite block design fMRI task. Compared with the non-placebo
condition, the participants with placebos demonstrated significant reduced brain
activities in multiple regions, including precentral gyrus, superior frontal
gyrus, superior parietal lobule and supramarginal gyrus. This
study may provide new insights into the neural mechanism of analgesia by
placebo.Purpose
Orthodontic pain induced by orthodontic treatment is a complex afflictive
experience that accompanies most orthodontic procedures. This pain starts 2 to 3
hours later after orthodontic treatment and reaches its peak 24 hours later. It
is considered to be the major cause of discontinuing orthodontic
treatment. A placebo is an agent that has no direct effect on the treatment of
a patient, but may help relieve the symptoms. However, the neural mechanism of
placebo effects in orthodontic pain remains largely unknown. In the present
study, we investigated the placebo modulation of brain activity associated
with orthodontic pain using task-based fMRI.
Methods
Twenty-three
female college students were recruited (aged
from 18 to 23, with mean age =20.22±1.38 years). For
each subject, orthodontic separators were placed between two nearby teeth 24
hours before a task-based fMRI scan. At baseline, the subjects were scanned without
placebo.
After a wash-out period of at least one month, all subjects were
scanned for the 2nd time after taking placebos. The short-form McGill
pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ) was used to
measure sensory,
affective, and evaluative dimensions of pain for all subjects.
The MRI examinations were performed with a 3-Telsa
Siemens MRI system using an 8-channel phase array head coil. The fMRI scan
parameters were: TR/TE=2000/30ms, flip angle=90°, FOV= 240 × 240, matrix = 64 ×
64, slice thickness=3.8mm without gap, 33 axial slices, 100 volumes in total. During
the scan, participants were instructed to perform
a bite (with maximum strength)/no-bite block design fMRI task with their eyes
closed. The task had six blocks and each block started from a 20s
no-bite period, and was followed by a 10s bite period. A standard GLM analysis was
then performed using FSL.
Results
Orthodontic pain induced by
separators demonstrated similar patterns of brain activities without
or with placebo. For both conditions, significant activations were shown in pain-related brain
regions, including bilateral insular cortex, central opercular cortex, and planum polare. However, compared
with the non-placebo condition, the participants demonstrated significant reduced activities in multiple
brain regions, i.e., pre-central gyrus, superior frontal gyrus, superior
parietal lobule and supramarginal gyrus (Figure.1), after
taking placebos. Additionally, the anterior cingulate
cortex was shown to be significant activated without
placebo, but was not activated with placebo.
Discussion and conclusion
The present study using
task-based fMRI demonstrated similar brain activation patterns for subjects
under orthodontic pain with or without placebos. These pain related regions,
including bilateral insular cortex, central opercular cortex, and planum
polare, are basically consistent with previous studies
1-6. With
placebo, reduced activation in the pre-central gyrus, superior frontal gyrus,
superior parietal lobule and supramarginal gyrus indicates that placebo may
play its role by inhibiting primary sensory, sensory association cortex and
pain regulation regions. Yet, how this inhabitation is applied remains to be
further investigated. Overall, this study may provide new
insights into the neural mechanism of analgesia by placebo.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Choi J C, Kim
J, Kang E, et al. Brain mechanisms of pain relief by transcutaneous electrical
nerve stimulation: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Eur
J Pain 2015;2(10):696.
2. Wilcox C E,
Mayer A R, Teshiba T M, et al. The Subjective Experience of Pain: An FMRI Study
of Percept-Related Models and Functional Connectivity. Pain Med
2015;19(10):12785.
3. Rance M,
Ruttorf M, Nees F, et al. Real time fMRI feedback of the anterior cingulate and
posterior insular cortex in the processing of pain. Hum Brain Mapp
2014;35(12):5784-98.
4. Peyron R,
Laurent B, and García-Larrea L. Functional imaging of brain responses to pain.
A review and meta-analysis (2000). Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical
Neurophysiology 2000;30(5):263-288.
5. Favilla S,
Huber A, Pagnoni G, et al. Ranking brain areas encoding the perceived level of
pain from fMRI data. Neuroimage 2014;90:153-62.
6. Bogdanov V B, Vigano A, Noirhomme Q, et al.
Cerebral responses and role of the prefrontal cortex in conditioned pain modulation:
an fMRI study in healthy subjects. Behav Brain Res 2015;281:187-98.