Tamar M van Veenendaal1,2, Desmond HY Tse1,3, Tom WJ Scheenen4, Dennis W Klomp5, Dominique M IJff2,6, Paul AM Hofman1,2,6, Rob PW Rouhl2,6,7, Marielle CG Vlooswijk2,6,7, Albert P Aldenkamp2,6,7, Walter H Backes1,2, and Jacobus FA Jansen1,2
1Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands, 2School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands, 3Department of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands, 4Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 5Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 6Epilepsy Center Kempenhaeghe, Heeze, Netherlands, 7Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
Synopsis
Many studies are performed to assess structural
or functional brain connectivity. However, these studies do not provide direct
information on neurochemical imbalances, which underlie abnormal neuronal
functioning. In this study, the concept of ‘large-scale neurotransmitter
networks’ is proposed. The spatial neurotransmitter network was assessed in
fifteen healthy participants who underwent 7T MR spectroscopic imaging. The
average glutamate and GABA concentrations were computed in thirty brain regions,
which were considered connected if the concentrations showed a significant correlation
over all thirty participants. Both glutamate and GABA networks showed
small-world characteristics, but further exploration of this concept is
currently ongoing.Introduction
Currently, many studies are performed to assess structural
or functional brain connectivity. These studies showed an efficient small-world
organization of the brain, which is a requisite adequate for cognitive function
[1].
Furthermore, several cognitive and neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s
disease, schizophrenia, or epilepsy show altered brain network characteristics
[1,2].
However, neuronal activity, which underlies brain function, encompasses action
potentials in the neurons and synaptic transmission between those neurons
through neurotransmitters. None of these biological processes are directly
measurable with functional or diffusion MRI, but neurotransmitters are
measureable using MR spectroscopy and might therefore give more direct
information about neuronal functioning. Previous studies have already shown
associations between functional connectivity and glutamate and GABA
concentrations
[3], but these studies only assessed local variations
in neurotransmitters. In this study, we assess global neurotransmitter
variations and propose the concept of ‘neurotransmitter networks’.
Methods
Fifteen healthy participants were included. Each
participant underwent 7T MRI (Siemens Magnetom), comprising a T1-weighted image
(MP2RAGE, TR/TE 4500/2.39ms, TI1/TI2
900/2750ms, FOV 173x230x230mm3, cubic voxel size 0.9mm3)
and a MRSI image (sLASER[4], cFOCI pulses[5], TR/TE
5520/38 ms, VAPOR water suppression, FOV 150x150x100mm3, voxel size 9.4x9.4x12.5mm3).
Metabolite spectra were analyzed using LCModel (version 6.3-1B) with a
simulated basis set of 21 metabolites (Figure 1). Spectra were excluded if the
SNR was below 20, if the Cramér-Rao lower bounds (CRLBs) of N-acetylaspartate
was higher than 3, the CRLB of total Creatine was higher than 10, or if the
CRLB of GABA or glutamate was higher than 15. The T1-weighted image was
registered to MNI space, in which an atlas was defined to divide the brain into
thirty brain areas (the four lobes divided into white and grey matter, left-right,
and fourteen subcortical brain regions). The mean neurotransmitter
concentrations were measured in these brain regions (relative to creatine,
Figure 2), and were corrected for grey and white matter content[6].
A number of region pairs display correlated
neurotransmitter concentrations over the group, whereas this correlation is
absent in other region pairs (Figure 3). If an increased neurotransmitter
concentration in one region is accompanied with an increased/decreased
concentration in another region, we may assume that these regions support
concerted brain activity and are therefore considered ‘connected’[7].
Thus, connectivity was defined as correlated neurotransmitter concentrations between
different brain regions among subjects. To obtain the neurotransmitter connectivity
matrix, the Pearson’s correlation coefficient between each pair of regions was
calculated. The connectivity between pairs of areas was set to 1 if the
correlation was significant (p<0.05) and 0 otherwise. The clustering
coefficient and the path length of this binarized connectivity matrix were calculated
with the brain connectivity toolbox[8]. A normalized clustering
coefficient and path length were obtained by dividing these measures by the
mean clustering coefficient and path length of 100 randomized matrices. These
normalized measures give information about the small-worldness of the network:
the ability to combine a high integration as well as segregation in a network[8].
Results
The neurotransmitter concentrations could be
measured reliable in 26 out of 30 brain areas, and only these areas were
included for further analysis. Twenty-three percent of the remaining regions
showed a significant correlation for the glutamate concentration, while a
significant correlation for the GABA concentration was found in 14% of the
regions. Both glutamate as GABA networks showed small-world characteristics,
with a clustering coefficient larger and a path length approximately equal to
those of random networks (Table 1).
Discussion
In this study, a new methodology is proposed to
investigate brain connectivity by assessing large-scale neurotransmitter
networks. Currently, this concept is being tested in healthy volunteers and
patients with epilepsy by assessing the reproducibility and comparing the
neurotransmitter networks with functional and structural networks. Future
studies are planned to validate the glutamate and GABA measurements.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] E Bullmore,
O Sporns. Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and
functional systems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2009; 10(3):186-198
[2] BC Bernhardt, S Hong, A Bernasconi, N Bernasconi. Imaging structural and functional brain
networks in temporal lobe epilepsy. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:624
[3] NW Duncan, C
Wiebking, G Northoff. Associations of regional GABA and glutamate with
intrinsic and extrinsic neural activity in humans – A review of multimodal
imaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2014;47: 36-52
[4] TWJ
Scheenen, A Heerschap, DWJ Klomp. Towards 1H-MRSI of the human brain at 7T with
slice-selective adiabatic refocusing pulses. Magn Reson Mater Phy 2008;
21:95–101
[5] RJ Ordidge, M
Wylezinska, JW Hugg, E Butterworth, F Franconi. Frequency offset corrected
inversion (FOCI) pulses for use in localized spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med. 1996
Oct;36(4):562-6.
[6] W Dou, N
Palomero-Gallagher, MJ van Tol, J Kaufmann, K Zong, HG Bernstein, HJ Heinze, O
Speck, M Walter. Systematic regional
variations of GABA, glutamine, and glutamate concentrations follow receptor
fingerprints of human cingulate cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience 2013;
33(31):12698-12704
[7] Ö Simsek, D Jensen. Navigating
networks by using homophily and degree. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences 2008;105(35):12758-12762.
[8] M Rubinov, O
Sporns. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and
interpretations. NeuroImage 2010; 52:1059-1069