High field imaging of large-scale neurotransmitter networks: concepts, graph theoretical metrics, and preliminary results
Tamar M van Veenendaal1,2, Desmond HY Tse1,3, Tom WJ Scheenen4, Dennis W Klomp5, Dominique M IJff2,6, Paul AM Hofman1,2,6, Rob PW Rouhl2,6,7, Marielle CG Vlooswijk2,6,7, Albert P Aldenkamp2,6,7, Walter H Backes1,2, and Jacobus FA Jansen1,2

1Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands, 2School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands, 3Department of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands, 4Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 5Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 6Epilepsy Center Kempenhaeghe, Heeze, Netherlands, 7Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands

Synopsis

Many studies are performed to assess structural or functional brain connectivity. However, these studies do not provide direct information on neurochemical imbalances, which underlie abnormal neuronal functioning. In this study, the concept of ‘large-scale neurotransmitter networks’ is proposed. The spatial neurotransmitter network was assessed in fifteen healthy participants who underwent 7T MR spectroscopic imaging. The average glutamate and GABA concentrations were computed in thirty brain regions, which were considered connected if the concentrations showed a significant correlation over all thirty participants. Both glutamate and GABA networks showed small-world characteristics, but further exploration of this concept is currently ongoing.

Introduction

Currently, many studies are performed to assess structural or functional brain connectivity. These studies showed an efficient small-world organization of the brain, which is a requisite adequate for cognitive function[1]. Furthermore, several cognitive and neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease, schizophrenia, or epilepsy show altered brain network characteristics[1,2]. However, neuronal activity, which underlies brain function, encompasses action potentials in the neurons and synaptic transmission between those neurons through neurotransmitters. None of these biological processes are directly measurable with functional or diffusion MRI, but neurotransmitters are measureable using MR spectroscopy and might therefore give more direct information about neuronal functioning. Previous studies have already shown associations between functional connectivity and glutamate and GABA concentrations[3], but these studies only assessed local variations in neurotransmitters. In this study, we assess global neurotransmitter variations and propose the concept of ‘neurotransmitter networks’.

Methods

Fifteen healthy participants were included. Each participant underwent 7T MRI (Siemens Magnetom), comprising a T1-weighted image (MP2RAGE, TR/TE 4500/2.39ms, TI1/TI2 900/2750ms, FOV 173x230x230mm3, cubic voxel size 0.9mm3) and a MRSI image (sLASER[4], cFOCI pulses[5], TR/TE 5520/38 ms, VAPOR water suppression, FOV 150x150x100mm3, voxel size 9.4x9.4x12.5mm3). Metabolite spectra were analyzed using LCModel (version 6.3-1B) with a simulated basis set of 21 metabolites (Figure 1). Spectra were excluded if the SNR was below 20, if the Cramér-Rao lower bounds (CRLBs) of N-acetylaspartate was higher than 3, the CRLB of total Creatine was higher than 10, or if the CRLB of GABA or glutamate was higher than 15. The T1-weighted image was registered to MNI space, in which an atlas was defined to divide the brain into thirty brain areas (the four lobes divided into white and grey matter, left-right, and fourteen subcortical brain regions). The mean neurotransmitter concentrations were measured in these brain regions (relative to creatine, Figure 2), and were corrected for grey and white matter content[6].

A number of region pairs display correlated neurotransmitter concentrations over the group, whereas this correlation is absent in other region pairs (Figure 3). If an increased neurotransmitter concentration in one region is accompanied with an increased/decreased concentration in another region, we may assume that these regions support concerted brain activity and are therefore considered ‘connected’[7]. Thus, connectivity was defined as correlated neurotransmitter concentrations between different brain regions among subjects. To obtain the neurotransmitter connectivity matrix, the Pearson’s correlation coefficient between each pair of regions was calculated. The connectivity between pairs of areas was set to 1 if the correlation was significant (p<0.05) and 0 otherwise. The clustering coefficient and the path length of this binarized connectivity matrix were calculated with the brain connectivity toolbox[8]. A normalized clustering coefficient and path length were obtained by dividing these measures by the mean clustering coefficient and path length of 100 randomized matrices. These normalized measures give information about the small-worldness of the network: the ability to combine a high integration as well as segregation in a network[8].

Results

The neurotransmitter concentrations could be measured reliable in 26 out of 30 brain areas, and only these areas were included for further analysis. Twenty-three percent of the remaining regions showed a significant correlation for the glutamate concentration, while a significant correlation for the GABA concentration was found in 14% of the regions. Both glutamate as GABA networks showed small-world characteristics, with a clustering coefficient larger and a path length approximately equal to those of random networks (Table 1).

Discussion

In this study, a new methodology is proposed to investigate brain connectivity by assessing large-scale neurotransmitter networks. Currently, this concept is being tested in healthy volunteers and patients with epilepsy by assessing the reproducibility and comparing the neurotransmitter networks with functional and structural networks. Future studies are planned to validate the glutamate and GABA measurements.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

[1] E Bullmore, O Sporns. Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2009; 10(3):186-198

[2] BC Bernhardt, S Hong, A Bernasconi, N Bernasconi. Imaging structural and functional brain networks in temporal lobe epilepsy. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:624

[3] NW Duncan, C Wiebking, G Northoff. Associations of regional GABA and glutamate with intrinsic and extrinsic neural activity in humans – A review of multimodal imaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2014;47: 36-52

[4] TWJ Scheenen, A Heerschap, DWJ Klomp. Towards 1H-MRSI of the human brain at 7T with slice-selective adiabatic refocusing pulses. Magn Reson Mater Phy 2008; 21:95–101

[5] RJ Ordidge, M Wylezinska, JW Hugg, E Butterworth, F Franconi. Frequency offset corrected inversion (FOCI) pulses for use in localized spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med. 1996 Oct;36(4):562-6.

[6] W Dou, N Palomero-Gallagher, MJ van Tol, J Kaufmann, K Zong, HG Bernstein, HJ Heinze, O Speck, M Walter. Systematic regional variations of GABA, glutamine, and glutamate concentrations follow receptor fingerprints of human cingulate cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience 2013; 33(31):12698-12704

[7] Ö Simsek, D Jensen. Navigating networks by using homophily and degree. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2008;105(35):12758-12762.

[8] M Rubinov, O Sporns. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations. NeuroImage 2010; 52:1059-1069

Figures

Example of spectrum, the fit made by LCModel, and the individual fits for glutamate and GABA made by LCModel.

Schematic overview of the preprocessing of the spectroscopic data: the spectra were first analyzed in LCModel (A) and aligned with the structural image (B). Both structural image and aligned MRS voxels were aligned to an atlas (MNI space) (C), and the mean metabolite concentrations per region were calculated (D).

Interregional associations of glutamate concentrations (after correction for tissue composition). Examples of two regions showing a high correlation between the glutamate concentrations (A) and two regions showing no correlated glutamate concentrations (B).

Small world metrics of the neurotransmitter network, the mean metrics of 100 randomized version of this network, and the normalized values of the neurotransmitter network.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
3343