Arjan D. Hendriks1, Natalia Petridou1, Catalina S. Arteaga de Castro1, Mark W.J.M. Gosselink1, Alessio Fracasso1, and Dennis W.J. Klomp1
1Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Synopsis
By maximizing acquisition volume, using efficient semi
LASER detection with editing and macro molecular nulling, GABA can be detected
at high SNR within 3 minutes. GABA concentrations were measured in the visual
cortex and in a phantom containing a known concentration of GABA. A
bootstrapping method was used to determine the accuracy.
The results indicate that the stability and fitting
accuracy of the method is sufficient to detect concentration changes of GABA
higher than 3% within a short scan time of less than 3 minutes. In resting
state, GABA fluctuations up to 30% are found in in-vivo brain measurements.Introduction
Knowledge about the main inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric
acid (GABA) of the brain can give important insight in human brain function.
This is valuable not only from a fundamental point of view, but also from a
clinical perspective, since imbalances in excitatory and inhibitory processes
are connected to several diseases like epilepsy, Parkinson, autoimmune
inflammation and stroke [1].
Several studies have demonstrated significant changes in
GABA levels between patient populations, however, with substantial variances of
GABA levels within groups. In this work we analyzed the physiologic variations
in GABA levels of the visual cortex in resting state using a fast and high SNR
method for accurate detection of GABA.
Aim
The aim of this work is to assess the stability and
fitting accuracy of the current fast GABA detection method to analyze variations
in GABA concentration. This is done by bootstrapping the spectroscopy data and
validation with a phantom.
Methods
Three healthy volunteers were scanned at a high field 7T
system (Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, USA). For validation purposes, a phantom
(ping-pong ball, with a diameter of 4 cm) containing water-dissolved GABA
(6.6mM) and creatine (48mM) was constructed and scanned.
The set-up used was a half-cylinder open transmit coil
with 8 transmit channels, combined with 2x16ch receive arrays covering the back
of the head (Figure
1).
Data acquisition was performed with a MEGA-sLASER [2] sequence with GABA
editing, enhanced with macromolecule suppression and FOCI pulses for better B1
performance [3]. The sequence parameters were: single voxel, TE/TR= 74/5000 ms,
in-vivo voxel size of 40x30x30 mm3, phantom voxel size of 17x20x17
mm3, spectral bandwidth: 4000 Hz, a total acquisition time of 2:46
min (16 averages) and 5:30 min (32 averages for bootstrapping). The
spectroscopy volume inside the phantom was 6x smaller than the voxel volume
in-vivo, due to phantom size limits. This is corrected, by selecting a GABA
phantom concentration 6x larger than in-vivo concentration, maintaining a
realistic SNR comparison between phantom and volunteers.
An in-house Matlab-based fitting model was used to fit
the data. Bootstrapping was performed by selecting different sets of 16
odd-even pairs from a total of 32 pairs (32 averages). For each selected
combination, the resulting spectrum was fitted. This was repeated 500 times.
Results
The spectral fitting of creatine and GABA is shown in Figure 2.
The SNR and goodness of fit (assessed using the Cramer-Rao lower bounds) is
calculated for increasing number of spectral averages. The SNR (Figure 2,
middle column) increases with the number of averages. The goodness of fit (Figure 2,
right column) stabilizes after 8 averages for creatine and after 16 averages
for GABA. The time to acquire 16 averages is 2:46.
Bootstrapping shows the variation of multiple
spectroscopy measurements in a phantom (Figure 3,
left). The mean and standard deviation of the bootstrap for six different
measurements is displayed. The bootstrapping shows a variation for creatine of
less than 0.5%, which is similar the total system stability. GABA shows a
variation of less than 3% both within bootstraps and between measurements.
When measuring in volunteers (Figure 3,
right), around 1% variation is found for creatine, which is a factor of 10 higher
than the variation for the phantom data. For GABA, a variation within
bootstraps is in the order of 8-12%. The difference in GABA concentration
between individuals is up to 30%.
Discussion and conclusion
The SNR improves with the number of averages. The
goodness of fit stabilizes for GABA at around 16 averages (2:46 min). For the
phantom data, the variation of the GABA measurements is less than 3% within and
between scans. However, for comparable measurements in volunteers a much larger
variation is found. Also, the variation between consecutive measurements (10%-30%)
is much larger than the variation within the scan (8-12%). This shows that
fluctuations of GABA signals are substantially larger than those caused by
intrinsic system noise and measurement instabilities. This implies that in the
visual cortex at resting state, GABA physiology fluctuates up to 30%.
In conclusion, the results indicate that stability and
fitting accuracy of the sensitivity optimized method employed here is
sufficient to detect concentration changes of GABA in the visual cortex higher
than 3%, within a fast scan time of less than 3 minutes. This brings us closer
to more real-time measurements of GABA levels. The in-vivo measurements suggest
that the large variation of GABA (up to 30% in this work) between individuals
is mainly of physiologic origin. Moreover, individual GABA levels can vary
within a temporal resolution of 3 minutes. This brings new insight in the interpretation
of GABA spectroscopy measurements.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] M.J. Donahue and J. Near et al. 2010 NeuroImage; 53:
392–398
[2] A. Andreychenko et al. 2012 Magn Reson Med;
68:1018–1025
[3] C. S. Arteaga de Castro et al. 2013 NMR Biomed; 26:
1213–1219
[4] A.D.
Hendriks et al. 2015 Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 23. Abstract 3200