Highly-Accelerated, Self-Calibrated Stack-of-Spirals Arterial Spin Labeling Using 3D SPIRiT Reconstruction
Yulin V Chang1, Marta Vidorreta2, Ze Wang3, and John A Detre2

1Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States, 2Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States, 3Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, People's Republic of

Synopsis

3D coverage of the whole brain by using RARE-refocused stack-of-2D-spirals often suffers from low temporal/spatial resolution due to the long spiral readout or long echo train. In this work we present a method that allows whole-brain coverage at 3 mm isotropic spatial resolution with one- or two-segment, accelerated acquisitions in both partition and spiral directions. The technique was applied in conjunction with background-suppressed pCASL, resulting in improved temporal/spatial resolution for quantification of cerebral blood flow.

Purpose

Arterial spin labeling (ASL) is a noninvasive method for quantifying regional cerebral blood flow (CBF)1,2. To achieve high SNR and allow background-suppression, RARE-refocused stack-of-2D-spirals (RARE-SOS) has been increasingly used in ASL imaging3,4. As an echo-train imaging method, RARE-SOS suffers from signal dropout and T2 blurring due to prolonged spiral trajectories and/or echo trains5 for high-resolution imaging, especially in the single- or two-shot mode to improve temporal-resolution. Parallel imaging provides an alterative to increase spatial resolution without reducing temporal resolution. In this work we attempted to measure whole-brain CBF at favorable spatial and temporal resolutions using accelerated acquisitions both in the partition direction and within each 2D partition.

Methods

5 healthy subjects (30±5 yo, 2M+3F) were imaged in a 3T whole-body (Siemens) scanner with a 32-channel coil. Accelerated 1-shot, 2-shot, and fully sampled 4-shot data sets all at 3 mm isotropic resolution along with the corresponding M0 maps were acquired, as listed in the Table. Each 2D partition (i.e., a “stack” in k-space) consisted of one or more spiral interleaves, each of which in turn consisted of 3 regions of different densities – fully sampled, 3X and 5X under-sampled from inner to outer k-space, as shown in Fig. 1. Acquisition in partition direction was 3X under-sampled with 13 auto-calibration partitions (centrically ordered), resulting in a total effective acceleration factor of 5.5. FOV was 216X216X144 mm3. Other acquisition details include: 90% background suppression6, 2-s pCASL labeling7, 1.5-s post-labeling delay, TE = 12.7 ms. 3D non-Cartesian SPIRiT8 and gridding9 were used for image reconstruction with the SPIRiT kernel size of 5X5X3.

Results

Figure 2 compares the single-shot magnitude images of a representative subject with and without SPIRiT reconstruction and the fully sampled 4-shot magnitude images at all three views. The SPIRiT reconstructed images (middle column) showed slightly more blurring than the 4-shot fully sampled images (right) because of the longer spiral readouts (Table). Compared to the raw images (left) the aliasing artifacts were significantly reduced. Figure 3 shows the reconstructed magnitude images, control-label different maps, and the CBF maps of the accelerated 1-shot, 2-shot, and fully sampled 4-shot images. Arrows indicate signal dropout at the orbitofrontal region of the brain. As expected from the spiral lengths listed in the Table, the 1-shot showed the largest drop-out and the 2-shot presented the least signal loss. The signal dropout in the magnitude images consequently affected the perfusion sensitivity in the orbitofrontal region (2nd and 3rd rows). In the sagittal view, the 2-shot image again showed the least through-slice blurring owing to the reduction in both spiral and echo-train lengths. In addition, the temporal resolution of the 2-shot sequence was twice as high as the fully sampled one. Results of other subjects were similar to the one shown in the Table.

Discussion

Although the total acceleration factor may not be as high as other recent parallel imaging reconstruction works, our method is self-calibrated, i.e., each measurement is completely self-contained and independent of additional scans and assumptions. This prevents any motion contamination of acquired data relative to pre-scan calibrations. Several aspects of the current method can potentially be improved: 1) computation of the image in each channel is time consuming; direct computation of the final combined image10 may save time of reconstruction; 2) since SPIRiT does not require regular sampling, variable-density sampling in the partition direction may further improve SNR and de-blurring; 3) since in ASL only magnitude images are used, a phase-constraint reconstruction method11 may help improve image quality.

Conclusions

A self-calibrated parallel imaging approach was developed to acquire and reconstruct highly accelerated non-Cartesian data for ASL with the whole-brain coverage at decent spatial and temporal resolutions.

Acknowledgements

NIH P41EB015893, MH080729, 5T32HL007954

References

(1) Detre et al. MRM 1992;23:37 (2) Buxton et al. MRM 1998;40:383 (3) Duhamel and Alsop, ISMRM 2004;11:518 (4) Vidorreta et al. NMR Biomed 2014;27:1387 (5) Glover and Law, MRM 2001;46:515 (6) Garcia et al. MRM 2005;54:366 (7) Dai et al. MRM 2008;60:1488 (8) Lustig and Pauly, MRM 2010;64:457 (9) Fessler and Sutton, IEEE TSP 2003;51:560 (10) Uecker et al. MRM 2014;71:990 (11) Willig-Onwuachi et al. JMR 2005;176:187

Figures

Figure 1 The variable-density spiral used in a single-shot acquisition for each 2D partition.

Figure 2 Single-shot accelerated magnitude images with and without SPIRiT reconstruction and the fully sampled 4-shot images at 3 mm isotropic resolution.

Figure 3 Magnitude, control-label difference, and CBF maps of accelerated 1-shot, 2-shot, and fully sampled 4-shot images in axial and sagittal views at 3 mm isotropic resolution. Acquisition details are listed in the Table.

Acquisition parameters and the mean CBF from 3 measurement configurations of one of the 5 subjects.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
3334